Recent Research Publications Spotlight the Complex Link Between Immigration and Australia's Housing Challenges
Australia's housing market continues to face significant pressure, with affordability concerns topping public priorities amid record population growth driven largely by overseas migration. Politician Pauline Hanson has repeatedly called for substantial cuts to immigration levels as a direct response to ease demand on rentals and home ownership. Her suggestions have sparked renewed debate, particularly as new academic studies and think-tank analyses examine the evidence base behind such proposals.
Recent publications from universities, research institutes, and policy bodies provide nuanced insights. These works move beyond simplistic blame games to explore supply constraints, demographic shifts, and the specific roles of different migrant categories. Understanding these findings is essential for policymakers, academics, and the broader public seeking evidence-based approaches to one of the nation's most pressing issues.
Contextualising the Housing Shortage and Migration Debate
Australia's housing system has long grappled with under-supply relative to demand. Government targets under the National Housing Accord aim for 1.2 million new homes over five years, yet completions lag due to planning delays, skilled labour shortages in construction, high material costs, and zoning restrictions. Net overseas migration has surged post-pandemic, contributing to population growth that outpaces new dwelling approvals in many capital cities and regional areas.
Pauline Hanson, leader of One Nation, argues that high immigration intakes exacerbate shortages by increasing competition for existing stock. She proposes reducing numbers to sustainable levels aligned with housing supply capacity. This view resonates with segments of the public frustrated by rising rents and house prices, but researchers emphasise that migration represents only one factor among many.
Key terms require clarification. Net overseas migration (NOM) measures the net gain from permanent and long-term arrivals minus departures. Temporary visa holders, including international students and skilled workers on visas, add to short-term demand but often occupy purpose-built accommodation or share housing. Permanent migration planning levels stand at 185,000 places for the 2026-27 program, with a focus on skilled streams.
Key Academic Study Challenges Scapegoating of International Students
A 2025 paper in the journal Higher Education, titled "Scapegoating international students for the rental crisis? Insights from large-scale evidence (2017–2024) in Australia," analyses extensive datasets across 76 national time points and 79 capital city observations. Researchers found no statistically significant relationship between international student numbers and rental cost increases for local residents once vacancy rates and broader inflation are accounted for.
The study highlights how political discourse often singles out students despite their relatively small share of overall housing demand. Many reside in dedicated student accommodation, reducing direct competition in the private rental market. This work underscores the importance of disaggregating migrant categories when assessing impacts, rather than treating all inflows uniformly.
Findings suggest that rental pressures stem more from chronic under-building and investor activity than from student populations alone. The authors call for policies addressing root supply issues instead of reactive migration caps that could harm university revenues and the education export sector.
AHURI Reports Examine Temporary Visa Holders' Housing Experiences
The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) released its Investigative Panel report in late 2025 on temporary visa holders and housing. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative data, it reveals how the crisis disproportionately affects recent arrivals on temporary visas, who face barriers to social housing and long-term rentals due to visa uncertainty and income documentation requirements.
Paradoxically, these same groups contribute to the construction workforce, with migrants comprising a substantial portion of trades and labour roles essential for increasing supply. The report recommends better integration of migration and housing planning, including targeted incentives for regional settlement and expanded purpose-built student and worker accommodation.
This research adds depth by focusing on lived experiences rather than aggregate statistics, showing how housing stress can hinder integration and economic contribution.
Photo by Henrique Felix on Unsplash
Think-Tank Analyses Weigh Supply Failures Against Demand Pressures
The Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) March 2026 publication "Growth that Builds: Beyond the immigration blame game" argues that structural supply restrictions—not headcount growth—are the principal barrier. It examines planning systems, land release, construction productivity, and financial incentives that limit optimal use of existing stock. Expanding building capacity and reforming approvals, the report contends, would better support both population growth and affordability.
In contrast, the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) has modelled scenarios where sustained high net overseas migration creates projected dwelling shortfalls exceeding 250,000 by 2028 across states. Their analysis links unplanned migration surges to intensified competition in capital cities.
The Australia Institute and Grattan Institute counter that migrants are not the primary driver of price escalation. Historical data shows house prices rising far beyond what population growth alone would predict, pointing instead to tax concessions for investors, low interest rate periods, and persistent under-supply. Cutting permanent migration might modestly ease rents in models—perhaps 2-6% over a decade—but at the cost of reduced economic growth, labour shortages in key sectors, and slower infrastructure development.
Methodological Approaches and Data Insights from Recent Publications
Researchers employ varied methods to isolate effects. Econometric models at postcode level, such as a 2020 study in the Journal of Housing Economics on immigration's impact on prices, found localised effects but stressed the dominance of supply elasticity. More recent large-scale panel data analyses control for vacancy rates, household formation trends, and internal migration patterns.
The National Housing Supply and Affordability Council’s State of the Housing System reports provide annual benchmarks, projecting shortfalls even if targets are met due to changing household sizes and regional disparities. Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics on dwelling approvals versus population growth illustrates the persistent gap.
These publications consistently define housing affordability as the ratio of costs (rents or mortgage servicing) to median household incomes, highlighting how it has deteriorated to record levels in several metrics by 2025-2026.
Stakeholder Perspectives from Academia and Policy Circles
University researchers and economists offer balanced views. Many acknowledge short-term demand pressures from rapid inflows while stressing long-term benefits of skilled migration for innovation, tax revenue, and addressing ageing populations. International students, for instance, support higher education institutions that generate billions in export income.
Policy experts at bodies like AHURI advocate integrated approaches: linking migration planning to housing targets, boosting construction apprenticeships (including through targeted visas), and reforming negative gearing or capital gains tax discounts to encourage more efficient use of stock.
Critics of sharp cuts warn of unintended consequences, such as reduced workforce participation in essential services and slower GDP growth. Proponents highlight the need for a population policy explicitly tied to infrastructure capacity.
Implications for Policy Proposals Like Those from One Nation
Hanson’s calls for lower immigration to reduce demand align with some modelling showing potential price moderation. However, publications emphasise that supply-side reforms yield more sustainable outcomes without sacrificing economic dynamism.
Evidence suggests modest migration adjustments could complement—but not replace—efforts to accelerate home building, encourage higher-density development in well-serviced areas, and improve productivity in construction. Regional incentives and better utilisation of existing dwellings through policy tweaks also feature prominently in recommendations.
Future research directions include longitudinal studies tracking migrant housing pathways and scenario modelling incorporating climate, technological, and demographic shifts.
Photo by TOR Nanthapong on Unsplash
Future Outlook and Broader Solutions Emerging from Research
Looking ahead, publications project continued pressure unless supply constraints are addressed decisively. The 2026 State of the Housing System report notes affordability metrics at historic lows, with rents consuming over 30% of median income in new leases in some areas.
Actionable insights from the literature include prioritising skilled migration for construction trades, streamlining approvals via digital planning tools, and exploring innovative housing models like modular construction or incentives for granny flats and secondary dwellings. International comparisons show countries with responsive planning systems better accommodate population growth without severe affordability crises.
Academic voices stress evidence over rhetoric, urging policymakers to weigh trade-offs carefully. Cutting immigration may offer short-term relief in specific markets but risks broader economic slowdowns if not paired with robust supply strategies.
Conclusion: Evidence-Based Pathways Forward
Recent research publications paint a multifaceted picture of Australia's housing challenges. While immigration contributes to demand, the weight of evidence points to supply-side failures as the dominant factor. Pauline Hanson’s proposals highlight legitimate public concerns, yet studies from AHURI, CIS, Grattan, and peer-reviewed journals advocate comprehensive strategies encompassing planning reform, workforce development, and targeted migration settings.
These works provide valuable resources for higher education institutions training future policymakers and researchers. Continued rigorous analysis will be vital as Australia navigates balancing population needs with livability and opportunity for all residents.
