Academic Jobs - Home of Higher Ed Logo

Ditch The Witch: Political Slogans Against Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan Turn the Heat on Labor

Submit News
a protest sign in front of a crowd of people
Photo by DJ Paine on Unsplash

The Sudden Appearance of a Controversial Mobile Billboard

A mobile billboard truck has been circulating through Melbourne's central business district, featuring a doctored image of Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan alongside the provocative slogan "Ditch the Witch." The campaign, which emerged prominently over the weekend of June 7-8, 2026, has sparked widespread condemnation from across the political spectrum while also highlighting deep divisions in public opinion about the state of political discourse in Australia.

The truck's displays include variations of the slogan paired with imagery portraying the premier in a witch's hat or holding symbolic items like a jerry can with messages urging action against her leadership. Interspersed among the political content are explicit advertisements for a local brothel, adding another layer of controversy to the already charged visuals. Observers noted the truck making multiple passes through busy areas, drawing attention from pedestrians and media alike.

Historical Echoes of a Familiar Slogan

The phrase "Ditch the Witch" carries significant historical weight in Australian politics. It was prominently used in 2011 during protests against then-Prime Minister Julia Gillard, particularly in relation to the carbon tax debate. At that time, opposition figures were photographed near similar signage, amplifying its reach and cementing its association with personal attacks on female leaders.

This latest iteration revives the trope just as Australia approaches its next federal and state electoral cycles. The reuse has prompted many to reflect on whether progress has truly been made in reducing gendered rhetoric in public life or if such tactics remain a persistent feature of heated political battles.

Immediate Reactions from Key Political Figures

Premier Jacinta Allan was quick to address the campaign directly. In public statements, she described the effort as sexist and part of a broader "corrosive" trend in political debate. She emphasised that while disagreement with policy is a cornerstone of democracy, personal attacks targeting women cross a line that should not be tolerated. Allan expressed concern about the message this sends to young girls and the potential normalisation of such behaviour.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese echoed these sentiments strongly, labelling the campaign "totally unacceptable" and highlighting the misogyny involved. He called for a reduction in the temperature of public discourse, warning that unchecked personal denigration could lead to serious consequences, including threats against public figures. Albanese stressed the importance of focusing on ideas rather than individuals, particularly when young people are watching.

Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard also weighed in, expressing disgust at the slogan's resurrection. She noted that while some improvements had been observed for women in politics since 2011, this development represented a setback. Gillard questioned why women and girls in Victoria should be subjected to visible misogyny and urged the removal of the signs.

Opposition voices offered a mixed response. Federal Deputy Liberal Leader Jane Hume agreed that sexism has no place in politics, advocating for criticism of policies and parties without resorting to gender-based attacks. Victorian Opposition Leader Jess Wilson described the language as inappropriate while acknowledging legitimate grievances with the government. One Nation leader Pauline Hanson took a different stance, suggesting Allan should "suck it up" in light of her own experiences with tough criticism.

Funding and Organisers Behind the Campaign

Details about the campaign's backers emerged rapidly. Franco Puleo, owner of the Gotham City brothel in South Melbourne, publicly confirmed involvement alongside other local business owners. The reported cost of the advertising effort reached approximately $105,000. Puleo framed the initiative as reflecting public sentiment rather than a formal political advertisement, arguing that it captured widespread frustration with the premier's accountability and governance style.

The inclusion of brothel advertisements alongside the political messaging raised additional eyebrows, with some viewing it as an attempt to blur lines or maximise visibility. The Victorian Opposition explicitly denied any connection to the campaign, stating they do not condone such approaches and prefer to focus on policy shortcomings.

Crowd waving australian flags at a rally

Photo by Kiros Amin on Unsplash

Jacinta Allan's Rise and Current Challenges

Jacinta Allan assumed the premiership in September 2023 following the resignation of Daniel Andrews. With a long parliamentary career dating back to her election in 1999 as the youngest female member at the time, Allan brought extensive ministerial experience in areas such as transport infrastructure, regional development, and industry. Her tenure has coincided with ongoing efforts to deliver major projects while navigating economic pressures and social issues.

Recent months have presented significant hurdles. Polling has shown softening support for Labor, with rising interest in minor parties like One Nation. Concerns around crime rates, infrastructure delivery, and union-related matters have featured in public debate. Speculation about leadership stability within Labor has also surfaced in the lead-up to the November 28, 2026 state election.

Policy Criticisms Fueling the Heat on Labor

Critics of the Allan government point to a range of issues including state debt levels, responses to crime, and perceived impacts on businesses and regional communities. Some public commentary frames the billboard slogan not primarily as a gender attack but as shorthand for dissatisfaction with these governance outcomes. Social media discussions reveal a split: one perspective sees the language as unacceptable personal targeting, while another views it as blunt expression of voter frustration with performance metrics.

Supporters of the premier counter that such tactics distract from substantive policy discussion and risk discouraging diverse participation in public life. They highlight Allan's record on major transport initiatives and her focus on accountability amid challenging circumstances.

The Intersection of Gender and Political Rhetoric

The campaign has reignited conversations about the unique pressures faced by women in leadership roles. Historical parallels with Gillard's experience underscore recurring patterns where female politicians encounter gendered slurs that male counterparts rarely face in the same form. Advocates argue this dynamic undermines efforts to encourage more women to enter politics and erodes the quality of democratic debate.

At the same time, defenders of robust criticism maintain that elected officials must expect intense scrutiny regardless of gender. The challenge lies in distinguishing legitimate accountability from attacks that cross into personal or discriminatory territory. This tension remains central to ongoing discussions about standards in Australian political communication.

Media Coverage and Public Sentiment

Traditional media outlets have extensively covered the billboard's appearances, often framing the story around the sexism debate while also noting underlying policy discontent. Public reactions, visible on social platforms and in street-level commentary, demonstrate polarisation. Some express outrage at the imagery and wording, while others share memes or statements endorsing the call for change in leadership.

The involvement of a brothel in funding has added a sensational element, prompting questions about the ethics and transparency of such campaigns. Observers note that the episode reflects broader trends in how political messaging is funded and disseminated outside traditional party structures.

Crowd holding australian flags at a sunny outdoor event

Photo by Kiros Amin on Unsplash

Implications for the Upcoming Victorian Election

With the state election scheduled for November 28, 2026, the timing of this controversy adds intensity to an already competitive race. Labor under Allan seeks a fourth term, facing an opposition led by Jess Wilson and growing support for other parties. The episode could influence voter perceptions on both sides—either galvanising support for the premier against perceived unfair tactics or amplifying calls for change based on governance critiques.

Analysts suggest the event may prompt parties to clarify their positions on acceptable campaign conduct while voters weigh policy substance against the tone of public debate. The coming months will likely see continued focus on these themes as campaigns intensify.

Looking Ahead: Pathways to Healthier Political Discourse

The "Ditch the Witch" campaign serves as a case study in the complexities of modern political engagement. It highlights the need for clearer boundaries around personal attacks while preserving space for vigorous policy critique. Stakeholders across the spectrum, including politicians, media, and civil society, have roles to play in modelling constructive dialogue.

Potential steps forward include stronger self-regulation by political actors, greater media scrutiny of inflammatory tactics, and public education on the impacts of gendered language. Ultimately, the episode underscores that sustainable democratic health depends on balancing accountability with respect for individuals in public office.

As Victoria prepares for its election, the conversation around this slogan offers an opportunity to reflect on what kind of political culture the state—and the nation—wishes to foster. Read the full ABC News coverage here. Additional context on related developments appears in this news.com.au report.

Portrait of Prof. Sophie Martinez
About the author

Prof. Sophie MartinezView author

Academic Jobs In House Author

Discussion

Sort by:

Be the first to comment on this article!

You

Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

New0 comments

Join the conversation!

Add your comments now!

Have your say

Engagement level

Browse by Faculty

Browse by Subject

Frequently Asked Questions

📰What exactly is the 'Ditch the Witch' campaign?

It refers to a mobile billboard truck displaying the slogan alongside images of Premier Jacinta Allan, which has been driving through Melbourne. The campaign also includes related messaging and advertisements.

⚖️Why has the slogan drawn so much criticism?

Many view it as sexist and reminiscent of past attacks on female leaders like Julia Gillard. It is seen as shifting focus from policy to personal, gendered attacks.

💰Who is behind the funding of the billboards?

Local business owners, including the owner of a Melbourne brothel, have confirmed contributing to the approximately $105,000 effort, describing it as reflecting public sentiment.

📜How does this compare to the 2011 Gillard protests?

The slogan was used during carbon tax debates against then-PM Julia Gillard. The reuse has prompted reflections on whether progress has been made against such rhetoric.

🗣️What has Jacinta Allan said about the campaign?

She condemned it as sexist, part of corrosive debate, and emphasised that while policy disagreement is welcome, attacks on women are not.

🗳️What is the context of the upcoming Victorian election?

Scheduled for November 28, 2026, it sees Labor seeking another term amid polling challenges, crime concerns, and rising minor party support.

📊Are there legitimate policy criticisms of the Allan government?

Yes, issues such as state debt, crime responses, infrastructure, and union matters have been raised by opponents and some in the public.

🏛️How have opposition parties responded?

They have distanced themselves from the specific tactics while noting areas of government performance they believe warrant scrutiny.

👩‍💼What broader issues does this raise for women in politics?

It highlights ongoing challenges with gendered language and personal attacks that may deter participation and affect the tone of public debate.

📈Could this affect the election outcome?

It may influence voter sentiment either by rallying support against perceived unfair tactics or amplifying existing dissatisfaction with governance.

🤝What steps could improve political discourse?

Suggestions include clearer standards on personal attacks, media accountability, and emphasis on policy-focused debate from all participants.