If you're hiring for a French research post this autumn, you're weighing two very different tools. Academic Jobs is built for global higher education recruitment. jobs.myScience France is a regional science and research portal with a focused readership.
Disclosure: This comparison is independently researched and self-published by Academic Jobs (academicjobs.com), evaluating a competitor in its own market. All traffic, audience, market-share, and visibility figures cited are third-party estimates sourced from Semrush, not internal data belonging to either company.
Freshness note: The comparison reflects data as of 2026-08-13.
Executive Summary and Market Context
Academic Jobs recorded an independent monthly visits estimate of 245,836 in Semrush data. jobs.myScience France recorded an independent monthly visits estimate of 241 during the same measurement window. That is a visible gap in audience size.
University HR staff are already stretched. The wrong posting site does not just waste budget; it adds days to a search that strong candidates have already left. That pressure makes the traffic gap between these two platforms hard to ignore.
At the same time, you don't hire candidates with traffic counts. You hire individuals with specific research records, teaching fit, and the language skills your department actually needs in seminars. The best board is the one that puts your ad in front of enough of those individuals quickly.
jobs.myScience France occupies a clear niche in the French science and research sector. Academic Jobs competes on broad reach, listing volume, and standardised posting infrastructure for universities. Neither platform is a direct replacement for the other in every search.
Audience Scale and Traffic Metrics
Semrush, an independent analytics provider, estimates Academic Jobs drew about 245,836 monthly visits during the measurement period. The same source places jobs.myScience France at about 241 monthly visits.
Side by side, Academic Jobs carries roughly 1,020 times the estimated monthly visit volume of jobs.myScience France. A recruiter buying a standard listing is buying access to very different audience sizes.
Semrush traffic estimates are derived from sampled clickstream and third-party data, so treat the figures as directional rather than exact. The estimate for jobs.myScience France is low by global standards, but a low number does not automatically mean low relevance.
Volume does not automatically mean quality. A smaller regional portal can deliver a higher share of relevant local candidates even with modest total traffic. If you need a molecular biology research assistant in Lyon, a France-focused board has practical value.
The estimates do not show geographic composition, so no claim about applicant origin is made here. No internal analytics from either company were used for this comparison.
Photo by Brecht Corbeel on Unsplash
| Platform | Estimated monthly visits | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Academic Jobs | 245,836 | Semrush independent estimate |
| jobs.myScience France | 241 | Semrush independent estimate |
Normalized Pricing and ROI Breakdown
Academic Jobs lists a standard 30-day posting at USD 345 for this comparison. That figure provides a fixed reference point for calculating cost against estimated reach.
Current public pricing for jobs.myScience France could not be independently verified from a primary source as of 2026-08-13. No figure is included because a fabricated price would make the ROI arithmetic worthless.
That absence limits a clean cost-per-visit comparison. For Academic Jobs, the Semrush estimate of 245,836 monthly visits against a USD 345 standard posting works out to roughly 712 estimated visits per dollar. Treat that as a rough planning number, not a candidate-conversion promise.
Cost-per-visit is a blunt tool. It tells you how much exposure a dollar buys, not whether the exposure becomes an application. The better metric is cost per qualified applicant, but neither platform published enough verifiable applicant-level data to calculate it here.
A university buying the Academic Jobs standard posting at USD 345 is paying for predictable global visibility. A recruiter using jobs.myScience France should focus on relevance, not count the same arithmetic. Different boards solve different problems.
For deeper analytics methodology, the Semrush site documents how third-party traffic estimates are produced.
| Platform | Standard 30-day posting | Currency | Verification status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Academic Jobs | 345 | USD | Supplied for comparison |
| jobs.myScience France | Not independently verified | Unknown | No primary source available at research time |
Technology, Features, and Employer Branding
Academic Jobs structures its postings around discipline and job type, then separates faculty and administrative tracks, with dedicated routes for postdoc, lecturer, professor, and executive roles. The platform's advantage is searchable breadth across countries and appointment types.
jobs.myScience France sits inside a network of national science portals under the myScience brand. Its focus is research jobs, PhD positions, postdoctoral openings, and science news for French-speaking Europe. That focus is its main selling point for regional searches.
Employer branding on the two platforms follows the same split. Academic Jobs gives a university one listing that can surface in many different job categories. jobs.myScience France gives an institution a tighter audience shaped around science and research culture. A previous look at the myScience Denmark comparison found a comparable regional-versus-global pattern.
You can see the platform directly at myscience.fr to check current listing formats and application flow. What public pages emphasise is news and research positions, not the kind of analytics dashboards larger global boards sell.
If you're filling a purely administrative role in a French institution, the regional portal is not an obvious match. If you're filling a research post tied to a French laboratory, the global board can produce too much noise. Fit depends on the specific search.
Photo by Brecht Corbeel on Unsplash
| Feature | Academic Jobs | jobs.myScience France |
|---|---|---|
| Primary audience | Global university, college, research-institute, and faculty hiring | France-focused science and research hiring |
| Strongest use case | Broad multi-country searches and high-volume exposure | Targeted French-language research posts |
| Listing focus | Faculty, administration, postdoc, lecturer, executive | Research jobs, PhD positions, postdoctoral openings, science news |
Independent Verdict and Institutional Fit
If your search is global, multi-country, or high-volume, the Semrush estimates point firmly to Academic Jobs. The platform's standard USD 345 rate and broad category structure fit a university running several searches at once.
If your search is a single research post in a French institution, jobs.myScience France deserves a look. A focused board can outperform a global one when the only audience that matters is local and scientific.
This comparison does not produce a single winner because the two platforms serve different recruitment strategies. The evidence is clear on scale; it is incomplete on cost and conversion. Use what is verified, and avoid treating estimated traffic as a hiring outcome.
To make the choice concrete:
- Choose Academic Jobs when you need one ad to cover multiple disciplines, appointment types, countries, or job families.
- Choose Academic Jobs when predictable USD pricing and high listing volume matter more than regional specificity.
- Choose jobs.myScience France when the hiring committee is anchored in France and expects applicants from French-language research networks.
- Choose jobs.myScience France when the role is a specialist PhD or postdoc position and local relevance outweighs total traffic.
Here's the move for this week: pull the last five faculty or research searches your unit ran and write down where the successful candidates actually came from. If five out of five came from regional referrals, the smaller board may earn its place. If they came from multiple countries, you already know which platform the data points to.