Academic Jobs - Home of Higher Ed Logo

Latest QILT Surveys Show Stable Employer Satisfaction and Strong Graduate Employment Outcomes Across Australian Universities

Publicar una historia
1056Opinión
Native advertising — guest articles from $400See packages
The University of Melbourne
Photo by Eriksson Luo on Unsplash

The latest results from Australia's Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching (QILT) surveys provide a detailed snapshot of graduate outcomes and employer perceptions in the higher education sector. Administered by the Australian Government Department of Education, these surveys, including the Graduate Outcomes Survey (GOS) and the Employer Satisfaction Survey (ESS), offer insights into employment rates, skills utilisation, and satisfaction levels across universities and other higher education providers.

Understanding the QILT Framework and Its Role in Australian Higher Education

QILT encompasses several key surveys that track the performance of the higher education system. The GOS captures short-term employment outcomes for recent graduates approximately four to six months after course completion. It also includes measures of overall satisfaction drawn from the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). The ESS gathers feedback from direct supervisors on how well graduates are prepared for the workforce. These tools help institutions, policymakers, and prospective students make informed decisions about program quality and career readiness.

Results are published on the official QILT website and contribute to the ComparED platform, which allows comparisons between institutions. Data covers domestic and international onshore graduates at undergraduate and postgraduate coursework levels, pooled across recent collection years for overall satisfaction metrics.

Key Findings from the 2025 Graduate Outcomes Survey

The 2025 GOS indicates strong labour market outcomes for Australian graduates. Full-time employment rates for undergraduates reached 75.4 per cent within four to six months of completing studies, up from 74 per cent the previous year. Participation rates remained solid, with 88 per cent for undergraduates and 93 per cent for postgraduates. These figures reflect the ongoing demand for higher education qualifications in a competitive job market.

Longitudinal data from the GOS-L shows substantial improvement in full-time employment over three years post-graduation. For domestic undergraduates, rates rose from 79.5 per cent in the short term to 91.7 per cent in the medium term. Similar positive trends appear for postgraduates, underscoring the long-term value of university qualifications.

Employer Satisfaction Remains Stable and High

The 2025 ESS reports overall employer satisfaction with graduates at 84.2 per cent. This figure has stayed relatively consistent since the survey began in 2016, with the lowest point at 83.6 per cent in 2017 and a peak of 85.5 per cent in 2024. Satisfaction across all measured domains exceeded 84 per cent, with adaptive skills at 90.7 per cent and technical skills at 94.0 per cent—both at their highest levels since 2016.

Supervisors rated graduates' preparedness for their current roles at 94.9 per cent, notably higher than graduates' self-assessment of 86.4 per cent. Feedback highlighted strengths in foundation and collaborative skills while suggesting areas for further development in employability and enterprise skills.

View the full ESS national report on the QILT website.

a large building with a lawn in front of it

Photo by Andy Wang on Unsplash

Student Experience and Broader Satisfaction Metrics

Alongside graduate and employer data, the Student Experience Survey (SES) within QILT tracks current students' perceptions of teaching quality, learner engagement, and support services. Independent higher education providers often perform strongly in these areas, with some institutions reporting satisfaction rates above 90 per cent in specific domains such as teaching and career preparation.

These metrics complement the GOS and ESS by providing a fuller picture of the student journey from enrolment through to employment. Institutions use the data to refine curricula, enhance support services, and align programs with industry needs.

Implications for Australian Universities and Policy

Stable employer satisfaction and improving employment outcomes suggest that Australian higher education continues to produce graduates valued by the workforce. However, variations across institutions and fields of study highlight opportunities for targeted improvements. Universities are increasingly focusing on work-integrated learning, micro-credentials, and skills development to address employer feedback on employability skills.

Policymakers, including the Department of Education, rely on QILT data to inform funding models, quality assurance through the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), and initiatives aimed at boosting graduate employability. The results also influence international student recruitment strategies, as strong outcomes enhance Australia's reputation as a study destination.

Stakeholder Perspectives Across the Sector

University leaders emphasise the importance of continuous improvement based on QILT insights. Many institutions celebrate strong performances in specific areas, such as technical skills or adaptive capabilities, while addressing gaps in areas like enterprise skills through enhanced career services and industry partnerships.

Graduates themselves report high levels of satisfaction with their overall educational experience in many cases, though individual outcomes vary by discipline, location, and personal circumstances. Employers consistently praise the technical and foundational skills of recent hires, reinforcing the sector's strengths.

Independent providers, represented by bodies such as Independent Higher Education Australia (IHEA), often highlight their competitive performance in student satisfaction surveys, attracting students seeking personalised support and high-quality outcomes.

Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement

While overall figures are positive, the sector faces ongoing challenges including skills mismatches in certain fields, the impact of economic conditions on graduate job markets, and the need to integrate emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence into curricula. Feedback from supervisors points to opportunities for greater emphasis on employability skills during degree programs.

Institutions are responding with initiatives such as expanded placements, entrepreneurship programs, and partnerships with industry. These efforts aim to bridge the gap between graduate self-perception and employer expectations while maintaining high standards of technical preparation.

people walking near brown concrete building during daytime

Photo by Ethan Shi on Unsplash

Future Outlook for Graduate Outcomes in Australia

Looking ahead, QILT surveys will continue to play a central role in monitoring the health of Australian higher education. With employment rates trending upward in longitudinal data and employer satisfaction holding steady, the outlook remains constructive. Continued focus on quality, relevance, and student support will help sustain these positive trends.

The integration of QILT data into platforms like ComparED empowers students and families to make evidence-based choices about where to study. For the sector as a whole, these surveys support accountability and drive innovation in teaching and learning practices.

Actionable Insights for Academics, Administrators, and Job Seekers

Academics can use QILT results to identify strengths in their programs and areas for curriculum enhancement. Administrators are encouraged to benchmark against national averages and peer institutions to inform strategic planning. PhD-track job seekers and early-career academics may find value in understanding employer priorities when preparing for roles in higher education or industry.

Prospective students should review institution-specific QILT data on the ComparED site when considering enrolment options. Employers can leverage the findings to refine recruitment and onboarding processes for recent graduates.

Retrato de Jarrod Kanizay
Sobre el autor

Jarrod KanizayVer autor

Academic Jobs In House Author

Discusión

por lo menos:

Sé el primero en comentar este artículo!

tú

Se le pedirá que se conecte antes de publicar su comentario.

Nuevo0 comments

¡Únete a la conversación!

¡Añade sus comentarios ahora!

Tenga su palabra

Nivel de compromiso

Browse por Facultad

Browse por tema

Frequently Asked Questions

📊What is the QILT Graduate Outcomes Survey?

The Graduate Outcomes Survey (GOS) is part of the Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching (QILT) framework. It measures short-term employment outcomes, further study activities, and overall satisfaction of recent graduates from Australian higher education institutions, typically four to six months after course completion.

✅How high is employer satisfaction with Australian graduates?

According to the 2025 Employer Satisfaction Survey (ESS), overall employer satisfaction stands at 84.2 per cent. This has remained stable over the past decade, with particular strengths in technical skills (94.0 per cent) and adaptive skills (90.7 per cent).

💼What are the latest full-time employment rates for graduates?

The 2025 GOS reports that 75.4 per cent of undergraduates secured full-time employment within four to six months of graduation, an increase from the previous year. Longitudinal data shows further improvement to over 91 per cent three years post-graduation.

🔍Where can I access detailed QILT results for specific universities?

Detailed results are available on the official QILT website at qilt.edu.au and through the ComparED platform, which allows comparisons of institutions on metrics including employment outcomes and satisfaction.

🎓How do QILT surveys benefit prospective students?

QILT data helps prospective students evaluate institutions based on real graduate outcomes, employer feedback, and student experience ratings, supporting informed decisions about courses and universities.

🏛️What role does TEQSA play with QILT data?

The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) uses QILT insights as part of its regulatory oversight to ensure quality standards across Australian higher education providers.

📈Are there differences between undergraduate and postgraduate outcomes?

Postgraduates generally show higher participation and employment rates. The 2025 GOS indicates 93 per cent participation for postgraduates compared with 88 per cent for undergraduates, with strong full-time employment across both groups.

🌍How have outcomes changed since the pandemic?

Employer satisfaction has remained stable throughout the pandemic period, with some skill areas such as adaptive and technical abilities reaching record highs in recent surveys, indicating resilience in graduate quality.

💡What feedback do employers provide on graduate preparedness?

Supervisors often highlight strengths in technical and foundation skills while recommending greater focus on employability and enterprise skills during degree programs to better prepare graduates for the workplace.

🛠️How can universities use QILT data for improvement?

Institutions benchmark their performance against national averages, identify program strengths and gaps, and implement targeted initiatives such as enhanced work placements and skills development to align with employer expectations.