Understanding the EU's New Competitiveness Push
The European Union is facing an urgent call to enhance its global standing amid geopolitical tensions, technological races, and economic pressures. This shift, often termed the 'competitiveness agenda,' gained momentum with former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi's influential 2024 report, 'The Future of European Competitiveness.' The report identifies key areas for action, including bolstering innovation, deepening the single market, and increasing public investments in research and development (R&D). Draghi emphasizes that Europe must reignite sustainable growth to match the dynamism of the US and China, with R&D playing a central role. In 2024, the EU allocated €403 billion to R&D, representing 2.24% of GDP—a figure that lags behind leaders like Sweden at 3.35%—highlighting the need for accelerated efforts.
Building on this, the European Commission's 'Competitiveness Compass' in January 2025 outlined a roadmap for regulatory simplification, strategic investments, and reducing dependencies. Universities, as engines of knowledge production, are positioned at the heart of this agenda, contributing through groundbreaking research, talent development, and societal innovation.
The European University Association's Landmark Report
The European University Association (EUA), representing 900 member universities across 48 countries as of January 2026, released its pivotal report 'Universities and Competitiveness: A Big Picture View on the EU’s New Policy Paradigm and the Implications for Universities' in late 2025. Drawing from workshops, interviews with 45 university leaders from 21 countries, and foresight methodologies, the report distills how institutions view their role in this paradigm. It frames the agenda as an 'emergency response' to polycrisis—overlapping challenges like the Russia-Ukraine war, climate change, demographic decline, and AI disruption—urging universities to adapt proactively.
The document warns that while opportunities abound, there's a significant risk of 'instrumentalisation,' where short-term political demands override universities' long-term missions, threatening academic freedom and autonomy. For instance, the EUA Autonomy Scorecard 2023 reveals mixed progress across 35 European systems, with average scores varying by dimension: organisational around 70/100, financial lower at 60s, underscoring vulnerabilities.
University Leaders Embrace the Agenda with Cautious Optimism
Surveyed leaders largely share the EU's sense of urgency, viewing the competitiveness focus as a chance to secure more funding and visibility for research and innovation. Many see potential in emerging areas like defense-related R&D, where European universities are increasingly engaging to support strategic autonomy. Optimism prevails, with institutions sharpening profiles within regional ecosystems and leveraging interdisciplinarity—blending STEM with social sciences and humanities (SSH)—to tackle complex challenges.
However, a recurring theme is the tension between political speed and academic timescales. Leaders stress that true innovation requires 'space for serendipity,' protected by autonomy and stable funding, not top-down mandates.
Pivotal Roles: Research, Innovation, and Education
Universities drive the knowledge cycle: from fundamental research to applied innovation and skilled workforce development. The Draghi report calls for massive public investment in basic research, echoing EUA's push for a €200 billion FP10 framework programme. In education, the 'Union of Skills' initiative demands lifelong learning and micro-credentials, areas where universities excel through joint programmes and equity-focused training.
- Research: Leading ERC grants and Horizon Europe projects position EU universities as global hubs, though funding per researcher trails US levels.
- Innovation: Partnerships with industry accelerate tech transfer, e.g., in clean energy and quantum computing.
- Education: Preparing graduates for labor shortages amid aging populations, with emphasis on high-skilled migration.
Real-world examples include alliances like European Universities initiatives, fostering transnational collaboration to boost competitiveness.
Navigating Risks of Instrumentalisation
Instrumentalisation risks manifest as pressure to prioritize 'priority' fields, sidelining SSH or critical inquiry. In dystopian scenarios outlined by EUA, universities could become 'skills machines' under tech oligarchies or face funding collapse in fragmented societies. The report cites Russia's Bologna exit and Ukraine's war-damaged HEIs (1 in 5 affected) as cautionary tales of geopolitical interference.
To counter this, EUA advocates safeguarding four autonomies: organisational, financial, staffing, and academic. Leaders call for evidence-based policies respecting university missions.
Three Scenarios for 2035: Foresight Insights
Employing futures thinking, the report sketches 2035 horizons:
| Scenario | Key Features | University Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Europe’s Resurrection | EU reforms, investments, enlargement | Funding boost, interdisciplinarity key |
| Tech Oligarchy | US hegemony, nationalism | Instrumentalised, brain drain |
| Fragmented Society | Localism, crypto economies | Elite access, community focus |
These 'conversation starters' urge strategic positioning amid VUCA conditions.
Case Studies: Universities in Action
Across Europe, institutions are adapting. Dutch universities lead in AI ethics via interdisciplinary hubs, combining tech with philosophy. German clusters like Munich's excellence initiative drive quantum R&D. In Southern Europe, Spanish alliances focus on green transitions, blending engineering and social sciences. Nordic models exemplify high R&D intensity (Sweden 3.35% GDP), informing EU-wide strategies.
The full EUA report details these dynamics.
Essential Conditions for Effective Contribution
EUA outlines prerequisites:
- Autonomy: Governance free from micromanagement.
- Funding: Sustainable, multi-year core budgets plus competitive grants.
- Interdisciplinarity: Breaking silos for holistic solutions.
- Openness: Global talent attraction, open science.
A proposed 'partnership for competitiveness' unites stakeholders for co-creation.
Stakeholder Perspectives and Broader Impacts
University presidents, policymakers, and industry echo the need for balance. On X (formerly Twitter), EUA posts highlight embrace tempered by warnings, sparking debates on autonomy. Impacts include enhanced employability—EU graduates face labor mismatches but lead in sustainability skills—and regional development via knowledge triangles.
Future Outlook: Pathways to Sustainable Prosperity
By 2030, success hinges on FP10 scale-up and EHEA alignment. Universities must foster internal trust, embrace digital transitions, and advocate vocally. The agenda offers a 'resurrection' path if risks are mitigated, positioning Europe as a resilient leader.
For those in higher education, this era demands agility: explore Draghi's full recommendations and engage in EUA initiatives.
Actionable Insights for European Academia
Institutions should:
- Conduct internal foresight exercises mirroring EUA's.
- Strengthen SSH-STEM bridges for competitiveness.
- Lobby for autonomy protections.
- Expand societal engagement via open labs.
This comprehensive approach ensures universities thrive as partners, not pawns, in Europe's competitiveness journey.
Photo by Martin Sanchez on Unsplash
