A startling new analysis from England's higher education regulator, the Office for Students (OfS), has revealed that sexual harassment is more than twice as prevalent at the country's top-tier universities compared to those with lower entry requirements. Among final-year undergraduates surveyed, 35 percent at 'high tariff' institutions—those demanding the highest A-level grades for admission, often including Russell Group members—reported experiencing sexual harassment since starting their studies. This contrasts sharply with 17 percent at low-tariff universities and 26 percent at medium-tariff ones. The findings, drawn from a comprehensive survey of over 50,000 students, underscore a troubling disparity in student safety across the sector, particularly at elite establishments synonymous with academic excellence.

High-tariff universities, characterized by rigorous admission standards and research-intensive environments, attract students from diverse backgrounds, many living away from home for the first time. This transition to independent living in bustling campuses can heighten vulnerability, yet the data suggests deeper systemic issues at play. The OfS expanded analysis, published in early May 2026, builds on initial 2025 survey results that already highlighted widespread experiences of misconduct, prompting regulatory action to compel institutions to strengthen prevention measures.

Understanding the OfS Sexual Misconduct Survey

The OfS sexual misconduct survey represents the largest of its kind in the UK, targeting final-year undergraduate students across English higher education providers. Administered as a follow-up to the National Student Survey (NSS) in 2025, it gathered responses from approximately 50,000 individuals, focusing on experiences since the start of their studies. Sexual harassment was defined broadly to include unwelcome sexual comments, questions about private life or body, suggestive looks or staring, and other non-physical behaviors. Sexual assault or violence encompassed unwanted sexual contact, providing a clear distinction for respondents.

Overall, 24.5 percent of respondents reported at least one instance of sexual harassment, while 14.1 percent experienced sexual assault or violence. These figures align with international benchmarks, such as an Australian survey noting similar commonality. The expanded 2026 analysis delves into variations by provider tariff, subject area, student demographics, and study mode, offering nuanced insights without speculating on causal factors. Providers were categorized by 'tariff' based on typical A-level entry grades: high (elite), medium, and low/unknown.

Disparities by University Type: Why Elite Institutions Face Higher Rates

The most alarming revelation is the elevated prevalence at high-tariff universities, where 34.9 percent of students reported harassment—nearly double the 17.6 percent at low-tariff providers. Sexual assault or violence followed suit at 20.7 percent in elite settings versus lower rates elsewhere. High-tariff institutions, encompassing many Russell Group universities like Oxford, Cambridge, and Imperial College London, often feature large residential campuses, medical schools, and competitive social environments that may amplify risks.

Experts suggest factors such as a higher proportion of young, non-local undergraduates living in halls contribute, fostering environments ripe for misconduct. However, the OfS emphasizes caution, noting no direct causation is established. Russell Group chief executive Prof Libby Hackett acknowledged the troubling data, reaffirming zero tolerance and committing to collaborative prevention efforts with regulators and communities.

Subject-Specific Hotspots in Elite Programs

Certain disciplines emerge as hotspots, particularly those with high entry barriers common at elite universities. Languages and area studies topped harassment reports at 42.4 percent, followed by veterinary sciences (41.3 percent) and medicine/dentistry (40.3 percent). Assault rates were similarly elevated: 29 percent in veterinary sciences, 25 percent in languages, and 23.3 percent in medicine/dentistry—far exceeding the 14.1 percent average.

These fields often involve close-knit cohorts, fieldwork, or clinical placements, potentially intensifying interpersonal dynamics. Female students bore the brunt, with 31.1 percent in veterinary sciences reporting assault. University and College Union (UCU) general secretary Jo Grady highlighted the implications for future professionals: "Perpetrators from these universities are more likely to end up in powerful jobs, risking the reproduction of these toxic cultures." For detailed breakdowns, the OfS analysis PDF offers comprehensive tables.

Photo by ALEXANDRE DINAUT on Unsplash

• Languages and area studies: Intense social interactions, study abroad opportunities.
• Veterinary sciences: Practical training with long hours, shared accommodations.
• Medicine/dentistry: High-stress environments, hierarchical structures.

Demographic Vulnerabilities Amplified at Top Universities

Women reported harassment at nearly three times the rate of men (33 percent vs 12.2 percent overall), and assault over twice as often. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) students faced 47 percent harassment rates versus 22 percent for heterosexuals, with bisexual women particularly affected. Students with mental health conditions reported 42.2 percent harassment—almost double the average—while those studying away from home saw 29.2 percent.

EU-domiciled students (31.1 percent) and those with highly educated parents (31.5 percent) also showed elevated figures, possibly linked to elite university demographics. These intersections demand tailored interventions, as National Union of Students president Amira Campbell urged collective action to dismantle enabling cultures.

Low Reporting Rates: Barriers to Justice

Despite prevalence, only 13.2 percent of harassment victims and 16.2 percent of assault survivors formally reported to their university. Distance learners reported highest (22.5 percent for harassment), while business/management students led assault reporting (35.5 percent). Confidence in support dipped for disabled students, highlighting gaps in trust and accessibility.

Universities UK advocates transparent policies and bystander training, while the OfS bans non-disclosure agreements since September 2024 to prevent silencing victims.

Institutional and Regulatory Responses

Since August 2025, OfS Condition of Registration B3 mandates proactive prevention: staff/student training, clear reporting paths, support protocols, and power abuse curbs. High-tariff universities like those in the Russell Group emphasize zero tolerance, investing in initiatives amid financial pressures. UCU calls for cultural overhaul, warning of perpetuated power imbalances. For guidance, Universities UK's staff-to-student misconduct framework provides strategic steps.

Case Studies and Student Voices

While aggregate data dominates, individual accounts echo trends. Past investigations, like Guardian's 2017 'epidemic' exposé, revealed staff misconduct at elite unis, prompting policy shifts. Recent Russell Group surveys on gender-based violence highlight ongoing efforts, with students demanding integrated consent training. NUS stresses victim-centered support, from counseling to independent adjudication via the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA).

Photo by Mathieu Stern on Unsplash

Broader Impacts on Higher Education and Careers

Sexual harassment erodes academic performance, mental health, and retention, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups in competitive elite settings. Long-term, it risks toxic cultures infiltrating professions like medicine. Proactive measures—trauma-informed policies, peer support networks—can foster safer campuses, aligning with OfS goals for 2027 resurvey transparency.

Path Forward: Solutions and Best Practices

Effective strategies include mandatory bystander intervention programs, anonymous reporting apps, and staff vetting. European peers offer models, like trauma-informed approaches at Lincoln University. Institutions must prioritize culture change over compliance, ensuring elite universities lead by example. Students, unions, and regulators must collaborate for accountability.

• Comprehensive training for all: Define misconduct, emphasize consent.
• Transparent reporting: 24/7 hotlines, no NDAs.
• Support ecosystems: Counseling, academic accommodations.
• Data-driven monitoring: Annual audits, NSS integration.
• Community partnerships: Local services for non-local students.

By addressing root causes, UK higher education can safeguard its future generations.