Publication Spotlight: Intersectional Analysis of Health Inequities
A new peer-reviewed study published in Social Science & Medicine sheds light on persistent challenges in healthcare access and outcomes for foreign-born adults who identify as sexual and gender minorities while also belonging to racial or ethnic minority groups. Titled "Bridging the Gap: Addressing Healthcare Disparities Among Foreign-Born SGM and Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations," the work is authored by Bozhidar T. Chakalov, Clare E.B. Cannon, and Michelle J. Ko. Readers can access the full article at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626006064.
The research focuses on individuals at the convergence of immigrant status, sexual orientation or gender identity, and racial or ethnic background. Sexual and gender minorities, often abbreviated as SGM, include people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other non-heteronormative orientations and identities. When these individuals are foreign-born and part of racial or ethnic minority communities, they encounter layered barriers that compound difficulties in obtaining timely, respectful, and effective medical care.
Understanding the Scope of the Challenge
Foreign-born populations in the United States face well-documented obstacles to health coverage. Many lack employer-sponsored insurance, and eligibility rules for public programs create additional hurdles. For those who are undocumented, federal law generally bars enrollment in Medicaid and Medicare except in limited emergency situations. Lawfully present immigrants often encounter a five-year waiting period before qualifying for many benefits. These structural factors intersect with experiences of discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and SGM status.
Broader data from organizations tracking health equity reveal consistent patterns. Hispanic, Black, and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals frequently report lower rates of health coverage and access compared with White populations. Asian populations show mixed results in aggregate, though subgroups experience notable gaps in routine care and screening. Language barriers, limited English proficiency, and fears related to immigration enforcement further deter care-seeking among immigrant communities.
Intersectionality at the Core
The study emphasizes that foreign-born SGM adults navigate multiple marginalized identities simultaneously. Structural racism and xenophobia create environments where individuals may delay or avoid care due to anticipated bias in clinical settings. Minority stress—the chronic strain from stigma and discrimination—can manifest in higher rates of mental health concerns, substance use, and chronic conditions. When combined with immigration-related vulnerabilities such as uncertain legal status or separation from family support networks, these pressures intensify.
Qualitative accounts from related research illustrate concrete examples. Some SGM migrants describe avoiding providers out of concern that disclosure of their identity could lead to community ostracism or immigration consequences. Others report providers lacking cultural competence around both immigrant experiences and SGM-specific health needs, such as gender-affirming care or HIV prevention tailored to diverse populations.
Evidence from National Data Sources
Reports compiled by the Kaiser Family Foundation highlight ongoing racial and ethnic disparities in perceived healthcare quality and access. Experiences with racism in medical encounters remain common, with healthcare workers themselves acknowledging differential treatment based on patient race. Similar patterns appear in assessments from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, which tracks quality measures showing that many racial and ethnic groups receive care that is less timely, less patient-centered, or less effective than care received by White patients.
Immigrant-specific analyses add further context. Noncitizens, including those with temporary or no legal status, exhibit lower insurance coverage rates. State-level variations exist, with some jurisdictions using their own funds to expand eligibility, yet coverage remains patchwork and subject to funding fluctuations.
Implications for Research and Practice
The Chakalov, Cannon, and Ko publication contributes to a growing body of intersectional scholarship by centering voices and data often overlooked in siloed studies of either immigrant health or SGM health. It underscores the need for data collection that captures multiple identity dimensions simultaneously rather than treating categories in isolation.
Healthcare providers and systems can draw several lessons. Training programs that integrate cultural humility around immigration status, racial equity, and SGM-affirming practices show promise in reducing mistrust. Community-based organizations familiar with specific ethnic and SGM populations can serve as trusted intermediaries for outreach and navigation services. Policy efforts that expand coverage options without regard to immigration status have demonstrated measurable improvements in access in states that have implemented them.
Broader Societal and Economic Context
Health disparities carry consequences beyond individual well-being. Untreated conditions lead to higher emergency care utilization, lost productivity, and intergenerational effects on families. For academic researchers and public health professionals, the study highlights opportunities to design longitudinal projects that track outcomes across identity intersections and evaluate intervention effectiveness.
Universities and research institutions play a central role in advancing this work through interdisciplinary centers focused on health equity, migration studies, and gender and sexuality research. Funding agencies increasingly prioritize projects that employ community-engaged methods and address structural determinants rather than individual behaviors alone.
Photo by Etactics Inc on Unsplash
Pathways Toward Equity
Addressing these gaps requires coordinated action across sectors. Expanded insurance eligibility, improved provider education, and reduced administrative barriers tied to immigration status represent foundational steps. Digital health tools and telehealth expansions can mitigate geographic and transportation challenges, provided they account for digital literacy and language access.
Advocacy efforts by professional associations and nonprofit organizations have pushed for inclusive data standards and anti-discrimination protections in healthcare settings. Evaluation of these initiatives will benefit from the kind of nuanced analysis presented in the recent Social Science & Medicine article.
Future Research Directions
The authors point toward the value of mixed-methods approaches that combine quantitative disparity measurements with qualitative insights into lived experiences. Comparative studies across countries of origin, arrival cohorts, and legal statuses could refine understanding of protective factors and risk amplifiers. Partnerships between academic teams and community stakeholders remain essential for ethical, relevant inquiry.
As demographic shifts continue—with foreign-born residents comprising a growing share of the population and increasing visibility of SGM identities—the urgency of targeted equity strategies grows. The Chakalov, Cannon, and Ko study provides a timely framework for scholars, clinicians, and policymakers seeking to close these persistent gaps.
