Recent Survey Uncovers Widespread Self-Censorship Among Faculty

A groundbreaking survey conducted by Ithaka S+R, a nonprofit higher education consultancy, has revealed troubling trends in academic freedom at U.S. universities. Released in April 2026, the study polled 4,003 researchers at four-year colleges and universities nationwide. In the 21 states with laws restricting 'divisive concepts'—primarily Republican-led states like Florida, Texas, Alabama, and others—48 percent of respondents reported that recent state policies limit their creative activities or research capabilities. Even more alarmingly, 29 percent admitted to deliberately limiting the topics they pursue in their work due to these restrictions.

These 'divisive concepts' laws, often aimed at curbing discussions on race, gender, and systemic inequality in classrooms and trainings, have created a chilling effect. Faculty across disciplines—from humanities to social sciences—are altering their research agendas to avoid potential backlash, grant denials, or professional repercussions. One anonymous respondent lamented, 'The collective institutional research capacity of the United States is in free fall. We are losing our leadership position in the world.'

Understanding 'Divisive Concepts' Legislation and Its Scope

Originating from a 2020 executive order by then-President Trump combating 'race and sex stereotyping,' these laws proliferated in Republican-controlled legislatures. By 2026, at least 10 states had enacted bans specifically targeting public higher education, with others like Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming following suit. Proponents argue they prevent indoctrination, while critics see them as viewpoint discrimination stifling intellectual inquiry.

In practice, these statutes prohibit teaching ideas such as 'one race or sex is inherently superior' or 'an individual is inherently racist/sexist due to birth traits,' even in voluntary trainings. Federal grant cuts under recent administrations have compounded the pressure, prompting faculty to self-edit grant proposals and publications.

Real-World Examples from Florida and Texas Universities

Florida's Stop WOKE Act (Senate Bill 90) exemplifies the issue. In 2022, the University of Florida barred three political science professors from testifying as expert witnesses against the law, citing conflict of interest—despite no compensation. This sparked lawsuits, with federal courts partially enjoining the act as viewpoint discrimination. Faculty report avoiding topics like structural racism in history or sociology courses.

In Texas, Senate Bill 17 banned diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, leading to self-censorship even beyond legal mandates. Professors have canceled classes on Plato's Republic or Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet fearing misinterpretation as promoting 'divisive' views. A FIRE survey in Texas found 35 percent of professors toning down writings and 27 percent avoiding public discussions. One Texas Tech humanities professor defected, stating, 'We're censoring classics to appease politicians.'

Broader Trends in Faculty Self-Censorship Nationwide

Self-censorship isn't confined to red states. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE)'s 2024 Faculty Survey of 6,269 professors found 42 percent likely to self-censor in classrooms, with conservatives (55 percent hiding views) far more affected than liberals. Topics like DEI, transgender rights, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict trigger caution across ideologies.

Yet red-state laws uniquely target progressive research. Ithaka data shows one in five faculty nationwide avoiding topics due to policies, but rates double in restrictive states. Humanities and social sciences bear the brunt, with STEM less impacted but still wary of federal funding ties.

Photo by Marija Zaric on Unsplash

Impacts on Research Output and University Hiring

The consequences ripple through academia. Reduced topic exploration hampers innovation; for instance, population health researchers in ban states avoid equity studies vital for public policy. Faculty migration is underway: 10 percent in restrictive states seek out-of-state jobs, 4 percent abroad. Blue states like California and New York report hiring surges from southern transplants.

Hiring suffers too. Red-state universities struggle attracting talent, exacerbating shortages. A respondent noted, 'Administrators have told faculty not to speak, teach, or research certain things.'

Stakeholder Perspectives: A Divided Landscape

Conservative faculty report chronic self-censorship from left-leaning campuses nationally, per FIRE. Liberals in red states fear retaliation over DEI-related work. AAUP chapters in Texas and Florida decry 'political interference,' while groups like Turning Point USA celebrate curbing 'indoctrination.'

Experts like Dominique Baker (University of Delaware) caution against oversimplifying: 'Not all blue states are welcoming; humanities cuts happen everywhere.' Administrators often prioritize compliance, eroding trust.

Case Studies: Personal Stories from the Frontlines

• At Texas A&M, a historian avoided grant applications on civil rights, fearing scrutiny.
• Florida State faculty rewrote syllabi, omitting gender studies modules.
• In Utah, a sociologist self-censored publications on inequality to secure tenure.

These anecdotes, drawn from surveys, illustrate daily compromises undermining scholarship.

Future Outlook: Escalating Challenges and Potential Shifts

With 2026 midterms looming, more states may enact restrictions. Federal policies could intensify grant scrutiny. Yet legal victories—like injunctions against Florida's law—offer hope. Enrollment declines in red states may force policy reversals if talent flight accelerates.

Photo by İsmail Efe Top on Unsplash

Actionable Solutions for Protecting Academic Freedom

Institutions can adopt Chicago Statement principles, affirming free inquiry. Faculty unions push transparency in compliance. Explore crafting resilient CVs for job mobility. Policymakers: repeal vague bans, fund neutrally. Collaborative research across states mitigates local risks.

For faculty eyeing moves, platforms like AcademicJobs.com faculty positions list blue-state opportunities. Legal challenges and AAUP advocacy continue.