Academic Jobs Logo

NUS Files Police Report Against Ex-Don Jeremy Fernando for Sexual Misconduct Allegations

Landmark Case Reshaping Consent and Reporting in Singapore Higher Education

Be the first to comment on this article!

You

Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

black and white police car on road during daytime
Photo by Josh Hild on Unsplash

Promote Your Research… Share it Worldwide

Have a story or a research paper to share? Become a contributor and publish your work on AcademicJobs.com.

Submit your Research - Make it Global News

The Incident and Initial Complaints

In late August 2020, Tembusu College at the National University of Singapore (NUS) received the first complaint against Dr. Jeremy Fernando, a non-residential fellow and associate professor. The undergraduate student alleged non-consensual sexual advances by the academic. NUS swiftly suspended Dr. Fernando on August 31, issuing a No Contact Order to protect the complainant.

A second complaint followed on September 7 from another undergraduate, echoing similar claims of inappropriate behavior. Internal probes revealed Dr. Fernando had maintained an 'intimate association' with one complainant, breaching NUS's staff code of conduct that prohibits romantic or sexual relationships between faculty and students due to inherent power imbalances.

This case highlighted vulnerabilities in residential college environments where dons interact closely with undergraduates in mentoring roles.

NUS's Internal Investigation Process

NUS's Victim Care Unit (VCU) and relevant offices conducted separate interviews. Dr. Fernando was cooperative but denied misconduct. On October 7, 2020, NUS terminated his employment, citing professionalism lapses. The university informed complainants of the outcome but delayed public disclosure, later admitting transparency shortcomings.

Under NUS's Policy on Protection Against Sexual Misconduct, investigations prioritize fairness, trauma minimization, and support. Interim measures like no-contact orders and counseling are standard.NUS Sexual Misconduct Policy

NUS internal investigation flowchart for sexual misconduct cases

The Controversial Police Report

Despite both complainants opting against police involvement, NUS filed a report on October 21, 2020, invoking 'civil duty' under Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code for arrestable offenses like outrage of modesty. NUS argued legal obligations outweighed victim preferences to prevent recurrence.

This sparked backlash from AWARE Singapore and victims' advocates, questioning victim autonomy and potential re-traumatization. Prof. Tommy Koh, Tembusu Rector, defended the move, considering mental health impacts.

Court Case and Resolution

The police probe culminated in March 2023 charges against Dr. Fernando for molestation—kissing a woman's lips on July 4, 2020, outraging modesty. Potentially punishable by up to two years' jail, fine, or caning.

In January 2025, prosecutors compounded the charge after victim agreement and compensation. State Courts granted discharge amounting to acquittal on January 29, barring retry.

Dr. Fernando maintains innocence on original allegations, focusing on academic pursuits abroad.

NUS Policy Framework Explained

NUS defines sexual misconduct broadly: harassment, exploitation, non-consensual contact. Consent must be affirmative, voluntary, ongoing. Reporting channels include Office of Student Conduct for students, HR for staff. Mandatory police reports for arrestables; support via Nurture Care Unit (NCU).

Processes ensure due process: investigations by trained staff, interim protections, confidentiality. Penalties range from warnings to expulsion/dismissal.

Recent Statistics and Trends

NUS's half-yearly 'Building a Culture of Respect and Consent' reports show steady cases: 8 in 2H2024 (7 student-related), 11 in 2H2023. Outcomes: expulsions, suspensions, warnings. 1H2023: 8 complaints, 3 assaults.

  • Underreporting prevalent; surveys indicate nearly 50% NUS/NTU students experienced misconduct.
  • Parliament 2019: 56 cases across 6 unis over 3 years (0.20/1000 students/year).

Technology-facilitated violence rising, per 2024 studies.

Responses from Other Institutions

NTU, SMU mirror NUS: zero-tolerance, consent modules, dedicated units. NTU flowchart guides reporting; SMU emphasizes bystander intervention. All enhanced post-2019 reviews.

For faculty jobs emphasizing ethics, check faculty positions with clear conduct codes. Rate professors via Rate My Professor.

Stakeholder Perspectives and Lessons Learned

Victims criticized NUS for overriding consent on reporting, fearing stigma. AWARE calls for mandatory reporting reviews. NUS improved transparency via public reports.

Experts advocate cultural shifts: ongoing training, power dynamics education. Residential colleges uniquely risky.

AWARE on Mandatory Reporting

Prevention Initiatives and Training

NUS mandates RC1000A Respect & Consent module for freshmen: e-videos, workshops. Staff e-courses refined yearly. Bystander programs, awareness campaigns.

Seek career advice on safe academic environments at Higher Ed Career Advice.

NUS students attending respect and consent workshop

Implications for Singapore Higher Education

Case underscores power imbalances, reporting dilemmas. Boosted policy standardization, victim support. Yet challenges persist: underreporting, digital harms.

For university jobs in Singapore, explore Singapore academic opportunities.

Lego police officer holding a baton against dark background

Photo by Addy Spartacus on Unsplash

Future Outlook and Actionable Insights

With AI ethics rising, integrate misconduct prevention. Universities pledge zero-tolerance; monitor via reports. Students: know rights, report confidently. Faculty: uphold boundaries.

Engage with Rate My Professor, search Higher Ed Jobs, advice at Career Advice, post jobs at University Jobs.

Portrait of Dr. Oliver Fenton

Dr. Oliver FentonView full profile

Contributing Writer

Exploring research publication trends and scientific communication in higher education.

Acknowledgements:

Discussion

Sort by:

Be the first to comment on this article!

You

Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

New0 comments

Join the conversation!

Add your comments now!

Have your say

Engagement level

Browse by Faculty

Browse by Subject

Frequently Asked Questions

⚖️What led to NUS sacking Jeremy Fernando?

Two undergraduates alleged non-consensual advances; investigation found intimate association breaching code.

🚨Why did NUS file police report without victim consent?

Legal duty under CPC for arrestables like outrage of modesty, prioritizing public safety.

🏛️What was court outcome for Fernando?

Molestation charge compounded Jan 2025; discharge amounting to acquittal.

📜Define sexual misconduct per NUS policy?

Non-consensual acts: harassment, exploitation, contact. Consent affirmative, voluntary.

📊Recent NUS sexual misconduct stats?

8 complaints 2H2024; trends stable, focus assaults.

🏫How do NTU/SMU handle similar cases?

Similar zero-tolerance, consent training, reporting units.

🎓Role of mandatory consent modules?

RC1000A at NUS educates freshmen on respect, bystander intervention.

🔒Underreporting in SG universities?

Surveys: ~50% experienced; stigma, distrust factors.

🩹Support for victims at NUS?

NCU counseling, interim measures, confidentiality.

👥Implications for faculty-student relations?

Strict no-romance rules due power dynamics; training emphasized.

⚖️AWARE's stance on reporting?

Review mandatory laws to prioritize survivor agency.