New Zealand's research community is sounding the alarm over a deepening crisis in publicly funded science, with approximately 700 roles lost since 2023. Researchers, including those at universities, warn that these cuts are triggering a brain drain, as talented scientists seek opportunities abroad. This situation not only threatens the nation's innovation pipeline but also directly impacts higher education institutions, where collaborations with Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) and funding streams have dwindled, affecting teaching, student training, and long-term research capacity.

The cuts stem from government reprioritizations following the 2023 election, aimed at streamlining the science system amid fiscal pressures. While the coalition government emphasizes targeted investments in high-impact areas, critics argue the reductions—totaling hundreds of millions in real terms—have left early-career researchers 'homeless,' referring to the end of fixed-term contracts without renewal prospects. Universities, reliant on public funding for fundamental research, are feeling the ripple effects, with departments scaling back programs and losing key personnel.

Background: Government Reforms and the Science Funding Landscape

Since late 2023, New Zealand's science sector has undergone significant restructuring. Key changes include the disestablishment of Callaghan Innovation, mergers forming entities like the Bioeconomy Science Institute, and the expiry of National Science Challenges without full replacement. Budget 2024 and 2025 saw baseline reductions of 6.5-7.5% across public organizations, compounded by inflation-eroded investments.

Public research and development (R&D) spending hovers at about 1.4% of GDP, lagging the OECD average of 3% and the government's own 2% target. Funds like the Marsden Fund, Endeavour Fund, and Health Research Council have been reprioritized, with net decreases totaling over $115 million across four years. These shifts prioritize commercial outcomes, sidelining public-good research in areas like geohazards, biodiversity, and climate modeling—fields where universities play a pivotal role.

For higher education, this means strained partnerships. Universities often collaborate with CRIs on multi-year projects; disruptions lead to incomplete datasets, halted PhD supervisions, and gaps in teaching materials derived from cutting-edge work.

Scale of Job Losses: From CRIs to University Labs

The Save Science Coalition's 2026 report documents over 700 science roles eliminated since 2023. Notable examples include:

• Bioeconomy Science Institute: 134 redundancies (86 science positions) announced in February 2026.
• GNS Science (Earth Sciences NZ): GeoHazards team reduced from 20 to 15 analysts, with voluntary redundancies.
• NIWA: Disestablishment of air quality and climate modeling teams, affecting experts like Olaf Morgenstern.
• Scion: Analytical chemistry redundancies.
• ESR: $20 million lab budget cut impacting disease monitoring.

Universities have not been spared. Victoria University's geophysics department faced cuts in late 2023, limiting student options. Massey University reduced science programs, leaving postdocs like Sean Bisset seeking opportunities in Australia. Broader tertiary cuts exceed 160 roles at polytechnics like Toi Ohomai and UCOL, amid enrollment declines.

Personal Stories: Researchers on the Brink

Andrea Bubendorfer, formerly at Callaghan Innovation, recounts colleagues facing homelessness and suicidal ideation after job losses. Many applied to hundreds of positions, accepting pay cuts to one-third or minimal hours. Caleb Rapson, a former GNS geohazard analyst, relocated to Italy for stability. Victoria University biology professor Phil Lester highlights lost biopesticide work on honeybees and a malaria vaccine from Ferrier/Malaghan Institutes, noting, "Work here in Wellington... has developed a new vaccine for malaria that has the potential to save hundreds of thousands of lives every year."

Chamira Rajapaksha from Scion describes team burnout from slower, lower-quality research post-cuts. These stories illustrate the human toll, particularly on early-career academics in universities bridging public and applied science.

University-Specific Impacts Across New Zealand

Higher education institutions are integral to the science ecosystem, training future researchers and conducting foundational work. Cuts exacerbate existing pressures:

• Victoria University of Wellington: Geophysics reductions limit undergraduate/postgraduate options; biology lab at risk for plant/honeybee research.
• Massey University: Science program trims force postdocs abroad, disrupting veterinary/agricultural training.
• University of Canterbury: Affected by CRI collaborations in hazards research.
• University of Auckland: Potential strain on interdisciplinary projects reliant on NIWA/ESR data.
• Otago and Waikato: Health/climate modeling gaps impact medical/environmental programs.

Universities NZ, the advocacy body, has downsized staff, shifting policy work in-house amid funding shortfalls. Polytechnic mergers (e.g., Te Pūkenga) add 160+ job losses, threatening vocational science training.

Photo by Aakash Dhage on Unsplash

The Brain Drain Threat: Losing Talent Overseas

With only one-third of displaced scientists finding NZ jobs, brain drain accelerates. Examples: Climate modelers to Germany, hazards experts to Italy/US, postdocs to Australia. Universities suffer as PhD graduates (20-40% emigrate) and academics leave for better pay/funding. Treasury warns of long-term capability loss; global competitors like Australia gain from NZ's exodus.

Implications for Higher Education and Student Pipeline

Universities face eroded research output, fewer supervisors for postgrads, and outdated curricula without CRI data. Student training suffers: Fewer hands-on projects in hazards, climate, biosecurity. International rankings slip as collaborations wane; domestic enrollment in science declines amid job scarcity signals. Long-term, NZ risks innovation lag in biotech, agritech—key exports.

Government Perspective and Counterarguments

Science Minister Penny Simmonds counters that total R&D is at record highs (1.5% GDP), with 2400 sector jobs added 2022-2024 (mostly private). Focus is 'world-class' research via simpler system. Critics note public funding decline starves foundational work feeding private gains.

Expert Views from University Leaders

Phil Lester (Vic U): Cuts redirect influential funds supporting long-term uni research. NZ Association of Scientists: Job losses erode networks; unis hit similarly. Vice-chancellors urge stable baseline funding to retain talent.

Path Forward: Recommendations and Solutions

Save Science Coalition proposes: 2% GDP science spend (0.6% public), cross-party consensus on baseline funding, workforce plan for retention, infrastructure protection. Universities advocate flexible staff mobility, incentives for early-career roles. Explore public-private hybrids, international partnerships to stem drain.

Explore opportunities in NZ higher ed resilience at research assistant roles.

Photo by Bhautik Patel on Unsplash

Future Outlook for NZ Higher Education Science

Without reversal, brain drain could hollow out unis, stifling next-gen talent. Positive signs: Private R&D growth, targeted funds. Actionable: Advocate via petitions, support uni job boards. NZ's world-class unis like Auckland, Otago remain hubs—bolster them to reverse tide.