The Emergence of a Landmark Study from University of Auckland
A recent research effort from the University of Auckland has sparked significant discussion in academic circles and beyond, particularly with coverage in the prestigious journal Nature. The study, titled "Are Men Toxic? A Person-Centered Investigation Into the Prevalence of Different Types of Masculinity in a Large Sample of New Zealand Men," delves into the challenging task of quantifying 'toxic masculinity'—a term that has permeated social discourse but lacked robust empirical grounding.
Led by doctoral candidate Deborah Hill Cone from the School of Psychology, alongside professors Chris G. Sibley and Danny Osborne, and collaborator Kieren J. Lilly from the University of Queensland, this work utilizes data from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS)—a flagship longitudinal project spearheaded by University of Auckland researchers. The NZAVS, ongoing since 2009, provides nationally representative insights into social attitudes, making it an ideal dataset for examining nuanced psychological constructs like masculinity profiles.
This investigation represents a pivotal contribution to higher education research in New Zealand, highlighting how university-led initiatives can address culturally sensitive topics with scientific rigor. As psychology departments across NZ universities grapple with teaching gender dynamics, such studies offer evidence-based frameworks for curricula in social psychology and gender studies courses.
Defining Toxic Masculinity: From Concept to Measurement Challenge
The phrase 'toxic masculinity' emerged in the late 1980s within mythopoetic men's movements and later gained traction in feminist scholarship, referring to cultural norms that equate masculinity with dominance, aggression, emotional suppression, and misogyny—norms that harm both men and society. However, critics argue the term is vague, ideologically loaded, and risks pathologizing all masculine traits.
University of Auckland researchers tackled this by operationalizing toxic masculinity through eight empirically derived indicators, drawn from established psychological scales. These include:
- Gender identity centrality: The extent to which being a man defines one's self-concept.
- Sexual prejudice: Negative attitudes toward sexual and gender minorities.
- Disagreeableness: Low agreeableness on Big Five personality traits, linked to antagonism.
- Narcissism: Grandiose self-focus and entitlement.
- Hostile sexism: Overt antagonism toward women who challenge traditional roles.
- Benevolent sexism: Patronizing views of women as needing protection.
- Opposition to domestic violence prevention initiatives: Resistance to gender-based violence policies.
- Social dominance orientation: Preference for hierarchical social structures.
This comprehensive approach moves beyond unidimensional scales, recognizing toxicity as multifaceted. For aspiring psychologists at NZ colleges, understanding these indicators equips them to design interventions that target specific harmful patterns without stigmatizing healthy masculinity.
The Power of the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study
The NZAVS stands as a cornerstone of New Zealand higher education research, collecting annual data from over 50,000 participants since 2009. Managed by University of Auckland's School of Psychology, it tracks attitudes on politics, health, diversity, and now masculinity. For this study, researchers analyzed responses from 15,808 heterosexual men aged 18-99, ensuring demographic representation reflective of NZ's population.
Such large-scale, longitudinal datasets are rare globally, positioning NZ universities like Auckland at the forefront of person-centered psychological research. Students in research methods courses can learn from NZAVS how to apply advanced analytics to real-world social issues, fostering skills for careers in academia or policy.Crafting an academic CV highlighting NZAVS experience can boost prospects in lecturer jobs.
Unpacking the Methodology: Latent Profile Analysis Explained
At the heart of the study is Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), a statistical technique that identifies unobserved subgroups within a population based on response patterns—step-by-step, it models probability distributions to cluster individuals into profiles maximizing within-group similarity and between-group differences.
- Data preprocessing: Standardize eight indicators from NZAVS waves 2018-2019.
- Model fitting: Test 1-8 profile solutions using fit indices like AIC, BIC, entropy.
- Profile assignment: Assign men probabilistically to best-fitting profile.
- Validation: Examine predictors (demographics) and outcomes (health, well-being).
LPA's person-centered approach contrasts variable-centered methods, revealing heterogeneity in masculinity. This innovation, honed at University of Auckland, exemplifies advanced quantitative psychology taught in NZ postgraduate programs.Read the Nature feature on measurement challenges.
Key Findings: Five Distinct Masculinity Profiles Emerge
The LPA yielded five profiles, shattering monolithic views of masculinity:
| Profile | Percentage | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Atoxics | 35.4% | Low across all indicators; healthy expression. |
| Low-Moderate Toxicity | 27.2% | Low-moderate on most; occasional prejudice. |
| Moderate Toxicity | 26.6% | Moderate levels; some narcissism/sexism. |
| Toxic Moderate | ~10% | Higher grievance, sexism. |
| Hostile Toxic | 10.8% | High on all; extreme prejudice, narcissism. |
Crucially, high gender identity centrality (feeling 'manly') did not predict toxicity—positive masculinity thrives independently. These profiles inform university counseling services targeting at-risk students.
Demographic Insights: Toxicity Linked to Disadvantage
Men in the hostile toxic profile were disproportionately older, from Māori or Pacific ethnic backgrounds, unemployed, low-income/education, religious, and residing in deprived areas. This underscores toxicity as a response to marginalization, not inherent to masculinity.
In NZ's bicultural context, universities like Auckland must tailor mental health support culturally, integrating Māori perspectives on whānau and resilience. Check university jobs in New Zealand for roles in equity-focused research.
Implications for Higher Education and Psychological Research
This study elevates University of Auckland's global profile in gender psychology, providing tools for evidence-based teaching. Gender studies courses can now use profiles to discuss nuance, avoiding overgeneralization that alienates male students.
Academically, it advocates targeted interventions: e.g., economic support for disadvantaged men reduces grievance. For postdocs, higher ed postdoc jobs in psych offer opportunities to build on NZAVS.
PsyPost coverage details profiles.Researcher Perspectives and Academic Debate
Deborah Hill Cone notes, "'Manly' men are not necessarily toxic. There is positive masculinity." Co-author Chris Sibley emphasizes LPA's value in uncovering subgroups. Nature questions measurability, citing scale debates.
Critics, including men's advocates on X, call it ideologically biased; others praise empirical rigor. Balanced views from Psychology Today affirm most men atoxic.Related brain research.
Cultural and Societal Context in New Zealand
NZ's diverse society—Māori (17%), Pacific peoples (8%)—amplifies findings. Toxicity correlates with deprivation, echoing colonial legacies. Universities foster inclusive dialogue via centers like Auckland's Equity Office.
Stats: NZ male suicide rate 3x female; study links toxicity to poor health outcomes, urging uni-led prevention.Pursue lecturer roles in psych.
Media Reactions and Public Discourse
Nature's Jan 19 feature amplified reach; X trends via @Nature, @PsyPost highlight 'good news' narrative. Media like Phys.org note risks of overgeneralizing. Some backlash deems study 'propaganda,' but academics support nuance.
- Positive: Challenges stereotypes, aids interventions.
- Critical: Indicators politically charged?
Future Directions and Opportunities in Academia
Researchers call for replication in diverse cultures, longitudinal toxicity tracking via NZAVS. Unis can expand: Māori masculinity studies, AI-LPA for big data.
Prospective researchers: Explore research jobs; rate profs at Rate My Professor. Positive masculinity programs boost student well-being.
Photo by Duskfall Crew on Unsplash
Conclusion: Nuanced Insights for a Healthier Society
University of Auckland's study reframes toxic masculinity as rare, context-driven—empowering targeted solutions. Explore higher ed jobs, university jobs NZ, career advice, rate professors, or post a job to advance this field.
