The Groundbreaking SUTD Study on Building Reuse

Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) researchers have delivered a pivotal study highlighting how sustainable building retrofits can dramatically slash embodied carbon emissions. By opting to retrofit rather than demolish and rebuild, the sector could achieve reductions of up to 70 percent in embodied carbon, with potential for even higher savings like 80 percent in optimized scenarios focusing on material reuse. This research, centered on a real-world transformation of a 1970s office block into modern co-living space, underscores the untapped potential of adaptive reuse in a city-state where rapid urban renewal often favors new construction.

The findings come at a critical juncture for Singapore, where the built environment accounts for over 20 percent of national greenhouse gas emissions. As the nation pushes toward its Green Plan 2030 targets, including greening 80 percent of buildings by gross floor area, this SUTD-led analysis provides evidence-based strategies to address not just operational energy use but the upfront carbon locked into materials.

Demystifying Embodied Carbon Versus Operational Carbon

Embodied carbon refers to the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the entire lifecycle of building materials—from extraction and manufacturing through transportation, construction, maintenance, and eventual demolition or disposal. Unlike operational carbon, which stems from a building's day-to-day energy consumption for heating, cooling, lighting, and appliances, embodied carbon is 'locked in' upfront and cannot be easily reversed once construction begins.

In Singapore's context, where buildings have an average lifespan of just 33 years despite being designed for 60 to 90 years, embodied carbon can represent up to 40 percent of a structure's total environmental footprint. This is particularly pressing as efficiency upgrades reduce operational emissions, making the material-related share proportionally larger. The SUTD study reveals how standard carbon calculators often underestimate embodied emissions by nearly 46 percent, masking the true climate impact of demolition-heavy practices.

Singapore's Built Environment Emissions Challenge

The building and construction sector is a cornerstone of Singapore's economy but also a major emissions driver. Currently, it contributes around 20 to 25 percent of the country's total carbon footprint, with embodied emissions gaining prominence as operational efficiencies improve. The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) reports that as of late 2022, about 55 percent of buildings by gross floor area were green-certified under the Green Mark scheme, saving energy equivalent to powering a million households.

Yet, challenges persist: rapid redevelopment sees structures like shopping malls demolished after just 11 years, releasing massive upfront emissions. With land scarcity limiting greenfield development, retrofitting existing stock emerges as a strategic imperative for achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, as outlined in Singapore's Long-Term Low-Emissions Development Strategy.

Unpacking the SUTD Research Methodology

SUTD's study meticulously compared embodied carbon in retrofitting versus full redevelopment using the Coliwoo Bugis project as a benchmark. Researchers analyzed material quantities, lifecycle assessments, and industry tools to quantify savings. Key to the 70 percent reduction was retaining the existing structural frame, which slashed concrete emissions by 91.8 percent and metal emissions by 63.9 percent. Interior elements like finishes and partitions saw up to 87 percent cuts.

Over a projected 30-year lifespan, the retrofit pathway yielded 11 to 15 percent lower whole-life emissions. The analysis also critiqued carbon estimation tools, highlighting systemic underreporting that perpetuates high-emission rebuilds.

Spotlight on Coliwoo Bugis: Retrofit in Action

The Coliwoo Bugis transformation exemplifies the study's principles. This 1970s office building was upgraded into vibrant co-living spaces without structural demolition, avoiding 2,552 tonnes of CO2 equivalent—roughly equivalent to 4 to 6 years of the building's operational emissions. By preserving the core frame and selectively reusing materials, the project not only curbed emissions but also enhanced functionality for modern urban living.

Such adaptive reuse aligns with Singapore's aging building stock and dwindling greenfield opportunities, offering a blueprint for scalable low-carbon upgrades.

Policy Landscape: BCA Green Mark and Retrofit Incentives

BCA's Green Mark scheme, launched in 2005 and updated in Green Mark 2021, now incorporates embodied carbon considerations alongside energy efficiency. Mandatory standards for new builds and major retrofits emphasize sustainable materials and lifecycle reductions. The Green Mark Incentive Scheme for Existing Buildings 2.0 (GMIS-EB 2.0) provides up to $63 million in cash grants for Platinum or Super Low Energy (SLE) retrofits until 2027.

Additional perks include bonus gross floor area under the Built Environment Transformation scheme. However, SUTD experts like Assistant Professor Peter Ortner note that the scheme's operational focus leaves embodied carbon under-regulated, calling for intensity thresholds and green finance reforms to incentivize reuse.

Benefits and Challenges of Sustainable Retrofits

Retrofitting offers multifaceted advantages:

• Environmental Gains: Up to 70-80 percent embodied carbon savings, faster payback via material retention.
• Economic Viability: Lower upfront costs, preserved value in prime locations, access to incentives.
• Social Value: Heritage preservation, affordable housing through adaptive reuse.
• Regulatory Alignment: Meets BCA targets, carbon tax hikes to $45/tCO2e in 2026.

Challenges include developer preference for predictable new builds, skill gaps in retrofit design, and financing hurdles. Overcoming these requires updated codes rewarding structural retention.

More Singapore Retrofit Success Stories

Beyond Coliwoo, projects like the National University of Singapore's School of Design and Environment (SDE4) demonstrate low-carbon retrofits achieving near-zero energy use through passive design and efficient systems. Heritage buildings retrofitted by CapitaLand integrate green features while cutting operational emissions by over 20 percent.

These cases illustrate scalable paths, blending innovation with practicality in dense urban settings.

SUTD's Leadership in Higher Education Sustainability Research

As a pioneer in engineering and design education, SUTD's Net Zero Futures Lab drives interdisciplinary research on low-carbon built environments. From AI-powered material mapping to carbon-negative systems, faculty and students are equipping the next generation with tools for net-zero transitions. This study exemplifies SUTD's impact, influencing policy and practice while training professionals for higher education jobs in sustainable architecture.

Pathways to Net Zero: Future Implications

Singapore's roadmap to 2050 net zero demands holistic decarbonization. With 80 percent SLE new developments by 2030 and embodied carbon integration in Green Mark, retrofits will play a starring role. SUTD's insights pave the way for embodied carbon benchmarks, circular material economies, and incentives shifting from demolition to renewal.

Stakeholders—from developers to policymakers—must collaborate to realize these gains, ensuring a resilient, low-carbon urban future.

Photo by Sinitta Leunen on Unsplash

Career Opportunities in Sustainable Building Design

The shift to retrofits opens doors in green engineering, architecture, and urban planning. Aspiring professionals can explore roles at universities like SUTD or industry leaders via university jobs, faculty positions, or career advice. Platforms like Rate My Professor offer insights into top educators in sustainability.

For Singapore-specific opportunities, check AcademicJobs Singapore.