The Reality of Uneven Workloads in Collaborative Assignments

University students around the world frequently encounter a frustrating scenario during group projects: one dedicated individual ends up handling the majority or even all of the workload while others contribute minimally or not at all. This pattern, often described as the solo carry, undermines the intended benefits of collaborative learning and creates significant stress for those who step up to ensure the assignment is completed on time and to a high standard.

Group assignments are a staple in higher education curricula because they aim to develop teamwork, communication, and problem-solving skills essential for professional environments. Yet when contributions become lopsided, the educational value diminishes. Students report spending countless extra hours researching, writing, designing presentations, and coordinating logistics that should have been shared responsibilities.

Root Causes Behind the Solo Carry Dynamic

Several structural and behavioral factors contribute to this imbalance. Random team formation often pairs students with differing motivation levels, schedules, and skill sets. Without clear accountability mechanisms, some members may assume others will handle the heavy lifting, leading to diffused responsibility.

Time constraints play a major role as well. With multiple courses, part-time jobs, and personal commitments, students prioritize individual tasks over group ones. Differing work ethics, communication styles, and ambitions further complicate matters. For instance, one student aiming for top marks may clash with peers satisfied with a passing grade.

Cultural and regional differences also influence participation. In some international student cohorts, varying expectations around individualism versus collectivism can lead to misunderstandings about what constitutes fair contribution.

Psychological and Social Factors at Play

Social loafing, the tendency for individuals to exert less effort when working in a group than when working alone, lies at the heart of many solo carry situations. This phenomenon has been observed across educational settings and is exacerbated when individual contributions are not easily identifiable or when rewards are shared equally regardless of input.

Free-riding occurs when students intentionally or unintentionally avoid their share of the work while still benefiting from the group's outcome. Research highlights that perceptions of unfairness quickly erode group cohesion, leading the solo carrier to feel resentful and isolated.

Expectations about others' behavior also matter. If a student anticipates low effort from teammates based on past experiences, they may preemptively take on more work to avoid last-minute crises.

Consequences for the Dedicated Contributor

The student who carries the project often faces burnout, reduced motivation for future collaborative work, and even impacts on mental health. Extra hours spent compensating for others can lead to neglected personal studies, sleep deprivation, and strained relationships outside the group.

Academically, while the assignment may receive a strong grade, the solo carrier misses opportunities to develop balanced teamwork skills. Over time, this can foster cynicism toward group-based assessments and a preference for individual work that does not always align with curriculum goals.

In extreme cases, the experience influences broader perceptions of higher education fairness, prompting some students to question the value of their degree programs.

Effects on Team Dynamics and Overall Learning

Uneven contributions damage trust within the group and can create lasting divisions. Free riders may develop poor habits that carry into professional life, while high performers learn to avoid reliance on teams.

From an institutional perspective, widespread solo carry experiences can lower overall student satisfaction with courses that emphasize collaboration. Learning outcomes suffer when the focus shifts from skill development to mere task completion by one member.

Peer relationships suffer as well, with some students reporting avoidance of certain classmates in future semesters based on previous group experiences.

Photo by Rendy Novantino on Unsplash

Instructor Challenges and Institutional Responses

Faculty members recognize the issue but often struggle with implementation of solutions due to large class sizes, administrative constraints, and the desire to simulate real-world teamwork. Many instructors incorporate peer evaluations, yet these can be manipulated or inconsistently applied.

Institutions are increasingly exploring training for both students and staff on effective collaboration. Workshops on conflict resolution, role assignment, and project management tools are becoming more common in orientation programs and faculty development sessions.

Evidence from Research on Group Work Behaviors

Surveys of university students consistently identify free-riding as the top concern with group projects across disciplines. One comprehensive study at an Australian university found that attitudes toward group work were heavily influenced by experiences with non-contributing members, with free-riding emerging as the dominant theme in open responses.

Another investigation into student preferences revealed strong support for smaller teams of two or three members, self-selection or schedule-based grouping over random assignment, and the use of one or two peer process evaluations to track contributions. Students also favored common grades paired with mechanisms for addressing issues through discussion rather than immediate expulsion.

These findings align with broader observations that identifiability of effort, task interdependence, and timely feedback reduce the likelihood of social loafing.

Proven Strategies for Students Facing Solo Carry Situations

Students can take proactive steps to minimize the risk or impact of uneven workloads. Choosing teammates based on demonstrated reliability rather than friendship or convenience is a frequent recommendation from those who have navigated multiple projects.

Establishing clear roles, deadlines, and communication norms at the outset helps set expectations. Using shared documents with version history and contribution tracking provides transparency.

When issues arise, documenting communications and contributions allows for constructive conversations or escalation to instructors if necessary. Some students advocate for early intervention rather than waiting until the deadline looms.

• Set up regular check-ins with specific deliverables assigned to each member
• Use project management platforms to log progress visibly
• Request individual accountability measures like section sign-offs or mini-presentations

Effective Approaches for Educators to Foster Balanced Participation

Instructors can design assignments that promote interdependence and visibility of effort. Breaking projects into phases with individual checkpoints allows for early identification of problems.

Incorporating peer evaluations that influence grades, when implemented thoughtfully, encourages accountability. Training students on how to provide constructive feedback improves the quality of these assessments.

Smaller group sizes, self-selection options where feasible, and explicit teaching of collaboration skills all contribute to more equitable outcomes. Some educators experiment with hybrid grading models that combine group and individual components.

Tools and Technologies Supporting Fair Collaboration

Digital platforms offer practical support for tracking participation. Learning management systems with analytics features, shared editing tools with activity logs, and dedicated peer evaluation software help make contributions visible.

Anonymous feedback mechanisms allow honest input without fear of interpersonal conflict. When combined with instructor oversight, these tools enable timely interventions that prevent full solo carry scenarios from developing.

Photo by Ashikul Islam Anik on Unsplash

Looking Ahead: Evolving Practices in Higher Education Teamwork

As higher education adapts to hybrid and online formats, new challenges and opportunities emerge for group work. Asynchronous collaboration requires even stronger structures for accountability.

Forward-thinking institutions are integrating teamwork competencies into program-level learning outcomes and providing resources for both students and faculty. Research continues to refine best practices, emphasizing the importance of aligning assessment with intended collaborative skills rather than assuming they develop automatically.

The goal remains to preserve the benefits of group projects while addressing the very real frustrations that arise when one person shoulders the load.

Building Resilience and Skills for Future Success

Experiencing or witnessing a solo carry situation, while challenging, can serve as a powerful learning opportunity. Students who reflect on these experiences often develop stronger project management abilities, clearer communication, and greater empathy for team dynamics.

Employers value graduates who can navigate imperfect team environments and still deliver results. Framing the challenge constructively helps transform frustration into professional growth.

Ultimately, addressing the solo carry phenomenon requires coordinated efforts from students, instructors, and institutions to create environments where collaborative work truly benefits everyone involved.