After more than three years of anticipation and mounting frustration, Erie County's long-delayed disparity study, commissioned at a cost of nearly $481,000, has finally been released. This comprehensive research report examines whether minority-owned, women-owned, and other disadvantaged businesses receive equitable opportunities in securing county government contracts. Originally slated for completion in just 12 months, the study's protracted timeline has sparked debates about government efficiency, accountability, and the value of such investments in promoting fair procurement practices.

Erie County, located in western New York and encompassing the city of Buffalo, serves a diverse population of approximately 950,000 residents. The study stems from legislative efforts to address potential inequities in public contracting, a critical issue given that the county awards hundreds of millions in contracts annually for services ranging from construction to consulting. Local lawmakers, particularly Democrats on the Erie County Legislature, pushed for the analysis to provide data-driven evidence supporting or refuting the need for targeted programs to boost participation from underrepresented business owners.

The release, announced by county leaders in mid-January 2026, comes amid broader national discussions on equity in government procurement. While the full findings are now public, initial reactions focus less on the results and more on the extraordinary delays that ballooned costs and eroded trust. This development underscores ongoing challenges in public sector research projects, where data collection, analysis, and validation can encounter unforeseen hurdles.

Understanding Disparity Studies: A Key Tool in Public Procurement Equity

A disparity study, formally known as a Disparity Study in Government Procurement, is an empirical research effort designed to statistically assess whether there are meaningful gaps—disparities—between the availability of certified minority business enterprises (MBEs), women business enterprises (WBEs), and disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs) and their actual utilization in government contracts. These studies emerged prominently following the 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision in City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., which mandated that affirmative action programs in public contracting must be supported by concrete evidence of discrimination or underutilization, rather than anecdotal claims.

The process typically unfolds in several rigorous steps. First, researchers define the relevant market area, often the county or metropolitan statistical area (MSA), and compile availability data using sources like census records, business directories, and certification lists from bodies such as the New York State Division of Minority and Women's Business Development. Second, they gather utilization data from historical contract awards, categorizing prime contracts, subcontracts, and payments. Third, statistical tests—such as disparity indices, chi-square analyses, and regression models—quantify differences, controlling for factors like business size, experience, and location. Finally, anecdotal evidence from business owners supplements the numbers to explore barriers like bonding requirements, networking limitations, or bid preferences.

In Erie County's case, the study was awarded to a consulting firm specializing in such analyses, though specifics on the vendor were highlighted in local reporting. Nationally, these studies inform policies like set-asides, mentorship programs, and bid credits, with states like New York actively using them to comply with both federal and state equity mandates.

The Commissioning and Promised Timeline

The Erie County Legislature approved funding for the study in late 2022, driven by a resolution to evaluate contracting practices amid concerns that MBEs and WBEs were underrepresented despite comprising a significant portion of the local business landscape. Erie County's demographics provide context: according to U.S. Census data, about 13% of the population identifies as Black or African American, 5% as Hispanic or Latino, and women own roughly 40% of small businesses regionally, yet their contract shares often lag.

The contract was valued at $480,875, with an expected delivery date of 12 months. This timeframe aligned with standard industry benchmarks for similarly scoped projects, involving analysis of several years' worth of contract data—estimated at over $300 million annually in Erie County expenditures. Lawmakers envisioned the report guiding updates to the county's procurement code, potentially expanding certification processes or launching supplier diversity initiatives.

Chronology of Delays: A Detailed Timeline

The project's history is marked by repeated postponements, as documented in county communications and media coverage. Here's a breakdown:

Reasons cited include complexities in compiling historical bid and payment records, the need for statistical validation by independent experts, and administrative bottlenecks within county departments. While no formal cost overruns were reported beyond the initial budget, the time extension raised questions about contract management oversight.

Photo by prashant hiremath on Unsplash

Breaking Down the $481,000 Investment

The study's price tag reflects the specialized nature of disparity research, which demands economists, statisticians, and procurement experts. Typical costs for county-level studies range from $300,000 to $600,000, covering personnel (60-70%), data acquisition (15-20%), software and modeling (10%), and reporting (5-10%). In Erie County's instance, the fee included on-site audits, stakeholder interviews with over 100 business owners, and custom econometric modeling tailored to local industries like manufacturing and healthcare services.

Comparatively, neighboring counties like Monroe (Rochester) spent around $400,000 on a similar study in 2023, completed in 18 months. Critics argue the Erie expenditure could have funded direct grants to small businesses, but proponents emphasize its long-term ROI through equitable contract distribution, potentially injecting millions into underserved communities.

Initial Reactions from Stakeholders

Erie County Legislature Democrats, who spearheaded the effort, expressed mixed relief and skepticism. Chairwoman April N. Baskin noted, "This data is crucial for real change, but the wait was unacceptable." County Executive Mark Poloncarz's office highlighted the study's readiness after rigorous peer review, positioning it as a foundation for evidence-based policy.

Local business advocates, including the Erie County Certified Minority and Women-Owned Business Enterprise Program, welcomed the release, urging swift implementation of recommendations. Posts on X reflected public sentiment, with users decrying taxpayer costs and others praising the push for transparency in procurement.

Opponents, including some Republican legislators, questioned the necessity, pointing to existing state-level data. For deeper insights into public sector research careers, professionals in this field often explore opportunities via platforms like research jobs.

Potential Impacts on Local Economy and Businesses

Erie County's economy, bolstered by sectors like healthcare, education, and logistics, relies heavily on public contracts. If the study reveals statistically significant disparities—as many urban county analyses do—it could lead to remedies like goal-setting for MBE/WBE participation (e.g., 15-25% targets), joint venture requirements, or unbundling large contracts for smaller firms.

Real-world examples abound: In Cook County, Illinois, a 2022 disparity study prompted a 20% increase in diverse vendor awards within two years, boosting local GDP by an estimated $50 million. Similarly, in New York City, post-study reforms have elevated WBE utilization from 8% to 18%. For Erie, implications include job creation in underserved neighborhoods and stronger supplier diversity, though challenges like capacity building for small firms persist.

• Enhanced competition lowering contract costs through more bidders.
• Community wealth-building via reinvested profits.
• Risk of legal challenges if remedies exceed evidence.

National Context and Comparative Insights

Disparity studies are commonplace across U.S. municipalities, with over 200 conducted since 2000. Nationally, MBEs comprise 12% of employer firms but secure only 4-6% of federal contracts, per U.S. Small Business Administration data. In New York State, the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance mandates such studies for localities seeking state aid.

Recent developments include updated federal guidelines under 2023 SBA rules emphasizing "anecdotal + statistical" evidence. Erie County's report aligns with this, potentially influencing regional peers like Niagara County. Expert opinions from procurement analysts, as shared in industry forums, stress timely execution to maximize impact— a lesson Erie learned the hard way. Read the full Buffalo News coverage.

Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

Challenges Faced and Lessons Learned

Common pitfalls in disparity studies include incomplete data sets (e.g., unreported subcontracts), scope creep from adding industries, and disputes over statistical thresholds (typically 80% disparity index for "evidence of discrimination"). Erie's delays likely stemmed from verifying payment records across multiple departments and incorporating post-COVID economic shifts.

Lessons for future projects: Implement milestone-based contracts with penalties, engage stakeholders early for data access, and use modular reporting for interim insights. These practices could halve timelines, as seen in streamlined studies by firms like Keen Independent.

Looking Ahead: Implementation and Future Outlook

With the study now public, the Legislature plans hearings in February 2026 to review findings and draft reforms. Potential outcomes include charter amendments for permanent diversity goals or partnerships with local chambers. Long-term, this could position Erie as a model for evidence-based equity in upstate New York.

For researchers and analysts eyeing public policy work, resources like academic CV tips prove invaluable. Businesses interested in certification should monitor updates via county portals.

In summary, while delays marred the process, the release offers a pivotal opportunity for inclusive growth. Stakeholders across the board emphasize action over analysis paralysis.

Explore related opportunities at higher ed jobs, research jobs, or university jobs. For career guidance, visit higher ed career advice and rate my professor.