Why Researchers Choose Academy of Management Review for High-Impact Publications
The Academy of Management Review stands as a cornerstone in the landscape of management scholarship, renowned for its rigorous exploration of theoretical foundations that underpin organizational and managerial practices. Established as a flagship publication, it attracts scholars worldwide who aim to advance conceptual frameworks in areas such as organizational behavior, strategy, and human resource management. With a commitment to intellectual rigor, the journal publishes articles that not only challenge existing paradigms but also propose innovative theories capable of guiding future empirical research.
Its prestige is underscored by a consistent ranking among the top journals in business and management disciplines. Researchers value the Academy of Management Review for its ability to amplify their work's visibility, given its extensive readership among academics, practitioners, and policymakers. The journal's impact factor of 13.4 reflects its influence, as citations from its pages frequently inform curricula in PhD programs in business and inspire real-world applications in corporate settings.
Delving into its scope, the Academy of Management Review emphasizes theoretical contributions over empirical data, making it an ideal venue for conceptual papers that synthesize literature or develop novel models. This focus distinguishes it from more data-driven outlets, appealing to theorists who seek to build bridges between disciplines like psychology, sociology, and economics within management contexts. The editorial process, known for its constructive feedback, helps authors refine their ideas, often leading to publications that become seminal references.
Moreover, the journal's affiliation with the Academy of Management ensures a global network of experts, fostering collaborations that extend beyond publication. For emerging scholars, publishing here can be a pivotal step toward tenure, as evidenced by its high citation rates and inclusion in top university reading lists. As management challenges evolve with globalization and technology, the Academy of Management Review remains at the forefront, offering a platform for ideas that address contemporary issues like sustainability and digital transformation.
To explore opportunities in academia, consider browsing higher ed jobs that align with your research interests after reviewing submission guidelines.
Overview & History
The Academy of Management Review was launched in 1976 by the Academy of Management, a leading professional association dedicated to advancing management knowledge. From its inception, it has served as a vital outlet for theoretical scholarship, filling a gap in the field by prioritizing conceptual development over empirical testing. Over the decades, it has evolved to reflect shifts in management thought, from early focuses on organizational theory to contemporary emphases on interdisciplinary approaches.
Key milestones include its rapid ascent to top-tier status in the 1980s, driven by influential editors who championed diverse perspectives. Today, it continues to shape the discipline, with archives accessible via its official site at https://journals.aom.org/journal/amr. Its history underscores a legacy of excellence, making it a must-read for anyone pursuing advanced studies in management.
Scope and Disciplines Covered
The Academy of Management Review covers a wide array of management subfields, emphasizing theoretical advancements. It welcomes manuscripts that develop, test, or extend theories relevant to management practice and research.
| Discipline | Description |
|---|---|
| Organizational Behavior | Theoretical models of individual and group dynamics in organizations. |
| Strategic Management | Conceptual frameworks for firm strategy and competitive advantage. |
| Human Resource Management | Theories on talent development, leadership, and workplace diversity. |
| Organizational Theory | Foundational concepts of structure, culture, and change. |
| Business Ethics | Ethical decision-making frameworks in managerial contexts. |
These disciplines align with broader business education, supporting resources like PhD programs in management.
Key Journal Metrics
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Impact Factor (2022) | 13.4 | Clarivate Journal Citation Reports |
| 5-Year Impact Factor | 18.2 | Clarivate JCR |
| h-Index | 312 | Scopus |
| CiteScore | 24.5 | Scopus |
| Acceptance Rate | Approximately 8% | Publisher data |
These metrics highlight its influence; for career insights, visit Rate My Professor.
Indexing and Abstracting
The Academy of Management Review is indexed in major databases, ensuring wide discoverability. It appears in Web of Science, Scopus, and ABI/INFORM, with abstracts available through Scopus and Google Scholar. This coverage aids researchers tracking citations and staying updated on theoretical trends.
- Web of Science (Clarivate)
- Scopus (Elsevier)
- EBSCO Business Source Complete
- ProQuest
Such indexing supports academic planning via academic calendar tools.
Publication Model and Fees
As a hybrid journal, the Academy of Management Review operates primarily on a subscription model, with open access options available through the Academy of Management's policies. Authors can choose traditional publishing at no cost or open access for an Article Processing Charge (APC) of $3,000, covering peer review and dissemination. Sherpa/RoMEO classifies it as green archiving compliant, allowing preprint deposits. No fees for standard submissions, promoting accessibility for global scholars.
Submission Process and Guidelines
Submissions are handled electronically via the journal's portal at https://journals.aom.org/journal/amr. Manuscripts should be original theoretical contributions, typically 8,000–12,000 words, formatted per APA style. The process involves initial editorial screening, followed by double-blind peer review, averaging 6–9 months to decision. Guidelines emphasize clarity, novelty, and theoretical contribution; detailed instructions are on the site.
For preparation, review tenure-track faculty positions to align with publication goals.
Editorial Board Highlights
The editorial team comprises distinguished scholars from top institutions. Editor-in-Chief Andrew J. Carton (Wharton School) leads with expertise in organizational behavior. Associate Editors include experts like Cynthia E. Devers (Virginia Tech) in governance and Blake E. Ashforth (Arizona State) in identity theory. This diverse board ensures balanced, high-quality reviews.
Why Publish in Academy of Management Review?
Publishing in the Academy of Management Review elevates a scholar's profile, offering exposure to influential audiences. Its high impact factor translates to substantial citations, aiding grant applications and promotions. The journal's theoretical focus allows for bold ideas without empirical constraints, fostering innovation. Moreover, it connects authors to the Academy of Management network, enhancing collaboration opportunities. For those in academic advising roles, such publications demonstrate expertise.
Comparison with Similar Journals
| Journal | Impact Factor | Focus | Acceptance Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Academy of Management Review | 13.4 | Theory development | 8% |
| Administrative Science Quarterly | 11.5 | Empirical organization studies | 10% |
| Journal of Management | 13.5 | Broad management reviews | 12% |
| Strategic Management Journal | 8.3 | Strategy empirics | 15% |
| Organization Science | 5.4 | Interdisciplinary empirics | 14% |
This comparison shows its edge in theoretical prestige; explore peers via PhD programs in organizational behavior.
Researcher Tips for Successful Submission
To succeed, ensure your manuscript offers a clear theoretical contribution, supported by comprehensive literature review. Avoid empirical data; focus on conceptual clarity. Engage with recent issues for gaps, and seek feedback pre-submission. Patience is key given the rigorous review. Track progress via the portal, and consider conference deadlines for synergy.