Why Researchers Choose Classical Quarterly for High-Impact Publications
Classical Quarterly has long been a vital resource for academics delving into the rich tapestry of ancient Greek and Roman literature, history, and philosophy. Established as one of the foremost journals in classical studies, it provides a platform for original research that advances understanding of classical antiquity. Scholars value its commitment to scholarly excellence, evidenced by a meticulous peer-review process that ensures only the highest-quality contributions are published. With a focus on textual criticism, philology, and interdisciplinary approaches, Classical Quarterly attracts contributions from leading experts worldwide, fostering a dialogue that bridges ancient texts with contemporary scholarship.
The journal's prestige stems from its century-long legacy, offering readers access to cutting-edge analyses of classical authors like Homer, Virgil, and Plato. Its impact factor, while modest compared to broader fields, underscores its specialized influence within classics, where depth trumps breadth. Researchers appreciate the opportunity to publish here for the journal's rigorous standards and its role in shaping academic discourse. For those in literature and related disciplines, submitting to Classical Quarterly means joining a tradition of intellectual rigor that enhances career profiles and citation potential.
Beyond its academic merits, the journal supports open access options through Cambridge University Press, making research more accessible. This hybrid model balances subscription-based stability with innovative dissemination. As classics evolve with digital humanities and global perspectives, Classical Quarterly adapts, publishing articles that explore new methodologies in ancient studies. Whether examining epic poetry or philosophical treatises, the journal remains indispensable for advancing knowledge in primary discipline of literature.
To explore opportunities in classical academia, consider browsing classics faculty positions to see how publishing here aligns with career growth.
Overview & History
Classical Quarterly was founded in 1907 by the Classical Association of the United Kingdom, with Cambridge University Press as its publisher since inception. It emerged during a period of renewed interest in classical education, aiming to provide a dedicated outlet for scholarly articles on Greek and Latin literature, history, and archaeology. Over the decades, it has evolved from a quarterly print publication to a respected digital resource, maintaining its quarterly cadence while expanding reach through online archives.
The journal's history reflects the development of classical studies as a discipline. Early volumes focused on philological notes and textual emendations, while modern issues incorporate comparative literature and reception studies. Key milestones include its digitization in the early 2000s, enhancing accessibility for global researchers. Today, it publishes around 40-50 articles annually, alongside book reviews and shorter notes, solidifying its status as a cornerstone in the field.
Scope and Disciplines Covered
Classical Quarterly encompasses a broad yet focused scope within classical antiquity, emphasizing original research in languages, literatures, and cultures of ancient Greece and Rome. It welcomes interdisciplinary work that intersects with philosophy, history, and art, but prioritizes literary and textual analysis.
| Discipline | Description |
|---|---|
| Literature | Primary focus on Greek and Latin texts, including poetry, drama, and prose. |
| Philology | Textual criticism, linguistics, and manuscript studies. |
| History | Ancient social, political, and cultural history through literary sources. |
| Philosophy | Analysis of classical thinkers like Aristotle and Cicero. |
| Reception Studies | Modern interpretations and influences of classical works. |
This multidisciplinary approach ensures comprehensive coverage, appealing to scholars in literature as the primary discipline, alongside classics and ancient history.
Key Journal Metrics
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Impact Factor (2022) | 0.3 | Clarivate Journal Citation Reports |
| 5-Year Impact Factor | 0.4 | Clarivate JCR |
| CiteScore | 0.5 | Scopus |
| h-Index | 45 | Scopus |
| Acceptance Rate | Not publicly disclosed | N/A |
These metrics highlight Classical Quarterly's steady influence in a niche field, where qualitative impact often outweighs quantitative scores.
Indexing and Abstracting
Classical Quarterly is indexed in major databases, ensuring visibility for published research. It appears in Web of Science (Arts & Humanities Citation Index), Scopus, and MLA International Bibliography. Additional coverage includes JSTOR for archival access and Google Scholar for broad dissemination. These indexations facilitate discoverability, with abstracts available through Cambridge Core and DOAJ for open access articles. Researchers benefit from enhanced citation tracking via tools like Clarivate's Web of Science.
Publication Model and Fees
As a hybrid journal, Classical Quarterly operates primarily on a subscription model, with open access available via Cambridge's Gold OA route. There is no mandatory Article Processing Charge (APC) for standard submissions; subscription-funded access covers costs. For OA publication, authors may opt to pay an APC of approximately Β£2,500 (subject to change), allowing immediate free access under a Creative Commons license. This model supports equitable access while maintaining high standards. Sherpa/RoMEO classifies it as green for self-archiving, permitting preprint deposits.
Submission Process and Guidelines
Submissions are handled through the ScholarOne Manuscripts platform on Cambridge Core. Authors must prepare articles in English (up to 8,000 words), following the journal's style guide for citations (author-date system). Peer review typically takes 3-6 months, involving two to three anonymous reviewers. Guidelines emphasize originality, with plagiarism checks standard. Cover letters should highlight novelty and fit within the scope. For detailed instructions, visit the official submission page.
Editorial Board Highlights
The editorial team, led by Editor-in-Chief Neil Hopkinson (University of Oxford), comprises distinguished scholars from top institutions. Associate editors include experts in Greek literature (e.g., from Harvard) and Roman studies (e.g., from UCL). The board's diversity ensures balanced oversight, with members from the UK, US, and Europe. Their collective expertise in philology and interdisciplinary classics guides the journal's direction.
Why Publish in Classical Quarterly?
Publishing in Classical Quarterly offers unparalleled prestige in classical studies, with a readership of dedicated scholars and libraries worldwide. Its rigorous review enhances manuscript quality, boosting author credentials. The journal's focus on enduring topics ensures long-term relevance, aiding tenure and grant applications. Compared to broader outlets, it provides targeted exposure within literature and classics, fostering connections in a specialized community. For career advancement, see how it fits with professor ratings in classics departments.
Comparison with Similar Journals
| Journal | Impact Factor | Focus | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Quarterly | 0.3 | Greek/Roman literature & philology | Cambridge UP |
| Classical Philology | 0.2 | Textual & linguistic studies | University of Chicago Press |
| Journal of Hellenic Studies | 0.4 | Broad classics, archaeology | Cambridge UP |
| Transactions of the American Philological Association | 0.3 | American classics scholarship | Johns Hopkins UP |
| Greece & Rome | 0.2 | Teaching & accessible classics | Cambridge UP |
This comparison shows Classical Quarterly's competitive edge in literary depth among peer publications.
Researcher Tips for Successful Submission
- Align your work closely with the journal's emphasis on original textual analysis.
- Consult recent issues for stylistic trends and citation practices.
- Seek feedback from colleagues before submitting to strengthen arguments.
- Highlight interdisciplinary angles to appeal to the board's broad expertise.
- Track academic calendars for related events that could inform your research.
These strategies increase acceptance chances in this selective venue.