Cornell Law Review – Law Journal Guide for Researchers

Why Researchers Choose Cornell Law Review for High-Impact Publications

Cornell Law Review stands as a cornerstone in legal scholarship, offering researchers a platform to disseminate groundbreaking ideas in law. Founded in 1915, this prestigious journal has evolved into one of the most cited publications in the field, attracting contributions from leading academics, practitioners, and policymakers. Its rigorous peer-review process ensures that only the highest-quality manuscripts are published, making it a sought-after venue for those aiming to influence legal discourse.

The journal's commitment to excellence is evident in its comprehensive coverage of contemporary legal issues, from constitutional law to international human rights. Researchers value Cornell Law Review for its ability to reach a global audience through extensive indexing in major databases. With a focus on innovative analysis and practical implications, articles here often shape judicial decisions and legislative reforms. The publication's quarterly issues feature in-depth symposia and student notes that provide fresh perspectives on emerging challenges.

For scholars navigating the competitive world of academic publishing, Cornell Law Review offers unparalleled visibility. Its association with Cornell Law School enhances credibility, while the editorial board's expertise ensures constructive feedback during review. Whether exploring doctrinal developments or interdisciplinary approaches, contributors find a receptive forum that amplifies their work's impact. As legal research becomes increasingly complex, this journal remains essential for advancing knowledge and fostering debate.

To elevate your research profile, consider submitting to Cornell Law Review and connecting with opportunities in legal academia via law faculty positions.

Overview & History

Cornell Law Review was established in 1915 by students at Cornell Law School, initially as a modest publication to showcase scholarly work. Over the decades, it has grown into a flagship journal, publishing seminal pieces that have influenced U.S. Supreme Court opinions and international law. Today, it maintains its student-edited tradition while incorporating faculty oversight, ensuring a blend of youthful vigor and academic rigor. The journal's archives, accessible via its official site, reveal a legacy of addressing pivotal issues like civil rights and environmental law.

Scope and Disciplines Covered

Cornell Law Review encompasses a broad spectrum of legal topics, emphasizing analytical depth and originality. It welcomes submissions on constitutional, criminal, and corporate law, among others.

DisciplineDescription
Constitutional LawAnalysis of rights, federalism, and judicial review.
Criminal LawProcedural reforms, sentencing, and justice policy.
International LawHuman rights, trade, and global governance.
Corporate LawBusiness regulations, mergers, and securities.
Environmental LawSustainability, climate policy, and resource management.

Key Journal Metrics

Cornell Law Review's metrics reflect its elite status in legal publishing. It boasts a high citation rate, underscoring its influence.

MetricValue
Impact FactorNot publicly disclosed (law journals often use alternative metrics like citation counts).
Acceptance RateApproximately 5-10% (highly selective).
Citations per ArticleAverage 200+ (based on HeinOnline data).
h-IndexOver 100 (indicating sustained impact).
Publication FrequencyQuarterly (four issues per year).

Indexing and Abstracting

The journal is indexed in premier databases, ensuring wide accessibility. Key services include HeinOnline, Westlaw, LexisNexis, and JSTOR, which facilitate research discovery. It is also abstracted in the Index to Legal Periodicals, enhancing its reach among scholars worldwide.

Publication Model and Fees

Cornell Law Review operates on a subscription-based model with open-access elements for older issues. There are no article processing charges (APCs) for authors, making it accessible without financial barriers. Print and digital formats are available, with subscriptions managed through the publisher.

Submission Process and Guidelines

Submissions are accepted year-round via the Scholastica platform. Manuscripts should be 10,000-25,000 words, double-spaced, with Bluebook citations. The process involves initial screening by editors, followed by expedited review. Authors receive decisions within 2-4 months. Detailed guidelines are on the official homepage: Cornell Law Review.

Editorial Board Highlights

The board comprises top students from Cornell Law School, led by an Editor-in-Chief with expertise in multiple legal areas. Notable members have clerked for federal judges and published in peer journals, bringing diverse perspectives to the selection process.

Why Publish in Cornell Law Review?

Publishing here elevates a scholar's career, offering prestige and networking opportunities. Articles gain traction in academia and practice, often cited in briefs and opinions. For early-career researchers, it serves as a launchpad for tenure-track pursuits. Explore related resources like Rate My Professor for insights into academic environments.

Comparison with Similar Journals

Cornell Law Review compares favorably with peers in selectivity and impact.

JournalAcceptance RateFocus AreasPublisher
Harvard Law Review~5%Broad legal scholarshipHarvard Law School
Yale Law Journal~6%Doctrinal and theoreticalYale Law School
Stanford Law Review~7%Interdisciplinary lawStanford Law School
Columbia Law Review~8%Public policy and lawColumbia Law School

Researcher Tips for Successful Submission

For academic planning, check the academic calendar and tenure-track positions. Additional links: legal research jobs, PhD programs in law, scholarship opportunities, legal studies conferences, postdoc in law, adjunct faculty law, visiting professor positions.

Frequently Asked Questions about Cornell Law Review

📈What is the current impact factor of Cornell Law Review?

Cornell Law Review does not have a traditional Clarivate impact factor as it's a law journal, but it ranks highly in citation metrics with over 200 citations per article on average per HeinOnline. For career advancement, review Rate My Professor profiles of contributors.

📊What is the acceptance rate for submissions?

The acceptance rate is approximately 5-10%, reflecting its selectivity. Successful authors often have prior publications. Explore tenure-track positions to see where alumni publish.

💰Are there article processing charges or fees?

No APCs are required; it's a no-fee model supported by subscriptions. This makes it accessible for independent scholars. Check scholarship opportunities for funding related research.

⏱️How long does the peer review process take?

Review typically takes 2-4 months, with expedited options for time-sensitive topics. Plan submissions around your academic calendar to align with deadlines.

📝Where do I submit my manuscript?

Use the Scholastica portal linked on the official site. Prepare with Bluebook citations. For guidance, visit PhD programs in law resources.

🔍Which databases index Cornell Law Review?

It's indexed in HeinOnline, Westlaw, LexisNexis, JSTOR, and Index to Legal Periodicals. This boosts visibility. Connect with peers via legal studies conferences.

👤Who is the Editor-in-Chief?

The Editor-in-Chief is a selected Cornell Law student, rotating annually. Past editors include future clerks and professors. Learn more through Rate My Professor.

🚀What career value does publishing here provide?

Publication enhances CVs for tenure and clerkships, with high citation potential. It's a key step for legal academics. Explore law faculty jobs post-publication.

⚖️How does it compare to peer journals like Harvard Law Review?

Similar in prestige and selectivity, but Cornell emphasizes student editing. Both offer strong impact. Compare via visiting professor positions at top schools.