Why Researchers Choose Economic History Review for High-Impact Publications

The Economic History Review stands as a cornerstone in the field of economic history, offering researchers a platform to publish rigorous, original scholarship that bridges history and economics. Established in 1928 by the Economic History Society, this journal has evolved into one of the most respected outlets for interdisciplinary work exploring long-term economic trends, institutional developments, and social transformations. Its commitment to high scholarly standards ensures that articles published here influence debates across academia, policy-making, and beyond.

With a focus on empirical analysis and theoretical innovation, the Economic History Review attracts contributions from historians, economists, and social scientists worldwide. The journal's rigorous peer-review process, overseen by an international editorial board, guarantees that only the most impactful research sees publication. Key strengths include its coverage of global economic histories, from pre-industrial societies to modern globalization, making it essential reading for those studying wealth distribution, trade networks, and technological change.

Researchers value the Economic History Review for its enduring prestige and visibility. Indexed in major databases like Scopus and Web of Science, articles here garner citations that advance careers and shape the discipline. The journal's quarterly issues feature special themes alongside general submissions, providing opportunities to engage with timely topics such as inequality or environmental economics in historical context.

For scholars aiming to publish in Economic History Review, the submission process emphasizes clarity, originality, and methodological soundness. Authors benefit from detailed feedback that refines their work, often leading to stronger publications. Whether you're a graduate student or established professor, contributing to this journal elevates your profile in the competitive academic landscape.

To explore related opportunities, check out history jobs on AcademicJobs.com and connect with the academic community.

Overview & History

The Economic History Review was founded in 1928 as the official journal of the Economic History Society, based in the United Kingdom but with a global readership. Initially focused on British economic history, it has expanded to encompass worldwide perspectives, reflecting the discipline's growth. Over the decades, it has published seminal works on industrialization, colonialism, and financial systems, establishing itself as a leader in the field.

Published by Wiley-Blackwell, the journal maintains a tradition of excellence, with each volume containing peer-reviewed articles, review essays, and book reviews. Its evolution mirrors broader shifts in academia, incorporating quantitative methods and cliometrics alongside qualitative narratives. Today, it serves as a vital resource for understanding how past economic events inform contemporary challenges.

Scope and Disciplines Covered

The Economic History Review covers a broad spectrum of topics within economic history, emphasizing interdisciplinary approaches. It welcomes research on economic structures, policies, and behaviors across time periods and regions.

Key Journal Metrics

The Economic History Review demonstrates strong performance in academic metrics, reflecting its influence and selectivity.

Indexing and Abstracting

The journal is widely indexed, ensuring broad accessibility and citation potential. It appears in Clarivate Web of Science (Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index), Scopus, and historical abstracts databases. This indexing supports discoverability for researchers searching Economic History Review impact factor or related terms.

Publication Model and Fees

As a hybrid subscription journal, the Economic History Review offers traditional access via institutional subscriptions while providing open access options through Wiley's OnlineOpen. There are no article processing charges (APCs) for standard submissions, making it accessible for authors without funding. Open access publication incurs a fee of approximately $3,500, covering production and dissemination.

Submission Process and Guidelines

Submissions to the Economic History Review are handled online via ScholarOne Manuscripts on the official journal site. Authors must prepare manuscripts in double-spaced format, up to 10,000 words, with abstracts and keywords. The process involves initial editorial screening followed by double-blind peer review, typically taking 3-6 months. Guidelines stress originality, avoiding simultaneous submissions, and adherence to the journal's style, available on the publisher's page.

Editorial Board Highlights

The editorial team includes distinguished scholars such as Editor-in-Chief Christiaan van Bochove (University of Antwerp) and associate editors from leading institutions like Harvard and Oxford. Their expertise in quantitative history and global economies ensures balanced, high-quality oversight. Board members contribute to special issues, enhancing the journal's relevance.

Why Publish in Economic History Review?

Publishing in the Economic History Review offers unparalleled visibility and credibility. With its solid impact factor and international audience, articles here influence policy and teaching. Authors gain from the journal's archival stability and networking opportunities through the Economic History Society. For careers in academia, a publication record in this venue signals expertise in publish in Economic History Review contexts.

Comparison with Similar Journals

The Economic History Review compares favorably with peers in scope and metrics.

Researcher Tips for Successful Submission

To succeed in submitting to the Economic History Review, start with a clear research question grounded in primary sources. Use robust data analysis to support arguments, and engage with recent literature. Seek feedback from colleagues before submission, and tailor your abstract to highlight novelty. Patience during review is key; revisions often strengthen the final piece. For more guidance, explore submission tips on AcademicJobs.com.