Why Researchers Choose New York University Law Review for High-Impact Publications
The New York University Law Review stands as a cornerstone in legal scholarship, offering a platform for groundbreaking research in legal affairs. Founded in 1935 by students at New York University School of Law, it has evolved into one of the most influential law reviews in the United States. Renowned for its rigorous analysis and forward-thinking perspectives, the journal publishes articles, notes, and comments that shape legal discourse on constitutional law, civil rights, international law, and emerging policy issues. Its commitment to academic excellence attracts contributions from leading scholars, practitioners, and emerging voices in the field.
Researchers value the New York University Law Review for its unparalleled reputation and wide readership among academics, judges, and policymakers. Each issue features meticulously edited pieces that undergo a thorough peer-review process, ensuring intellectual depth and clarity. The journal's focus on interdisciplinary approaches allows it to bridge law with economics, technology, and social sciences, making it a vital resource for multifaceted legal studies. With a history of citing pivotal cases and influencing landmark decisions, publishing here elevates a scholar's profile and contributes to lasting legal advancements.
Whether exploring antitrust regulations or human rights frameworks, the New York University Law Review provides a space for nuanced arguments that challenge conventional wisdom. Its annual symposia and special issues on timely topics further amplify its impact, drawing global attention to pressing legal challenges. For those aiming to disseminate influential work, this journal offers unmatched visibility and credibility in the legal community.
To explore academic opportunities related to legal research, visit our law professor jobs section or check the academic calendar for upcoming events.
Overview & History
The New York University Law Review was established in 1935 as a student-edited publication dedicated to advancing legal scholarship. Over the decades, it has published seminal works that have informed Supreme Court opinions and legislative reforms. Today, it remains a quarterly journal produced by NYU Law students, maintaining its tradition of intellectual rigor while adapting to contemporary legal issues like cybersecurity law and climate justice.
Scope and Disciplines Covered
The journal encompasses a broad spectrum of legal topics, emphasizing analytical depth and practical implications. It welcomes submissions on domestic and international law, with a particular interest in innovative theories and empirical studies.
| Discipline | Description |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Law | Analysis of U.S. Constitution interpretations and amendments. |
| Civil Rights | Explorations of equality, discrimination, and social justice. |
| International Law | Global treaties, human rights, and cross-border disputes. |
| Corporate Law | Business regulations, mergers, and governance. |
| Environmental Law | Sustainability policies and regulatory frameworks. |
Key Journal Metrics
While traditional impact factors are not applicable to law reviews, the New York University Law Review boasts high citation rates in legal databases and widespread influence in academia.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1935 |
| Issues per Year | 4 |
| Acceptance Rate | Approximately 5% |
| Circulation | Over 10,000 |
| Impact Factor | Not publicly disclosed |
Indexing and Abstracting
The New York University Law Review is indexed in major legal databases, ensuring broad accessibility. Key services include HeinOnline, Westlaw, LexisNexis, and the Social Science Citation Index. These platforms facilitate easy discovery and citation tracking for published works. For more on academic resources, see our rate my professor tool.
Publication Model and Fees
As a student-run law review, the New York University Law Review operates on a subscription model with no article processing charges (APC). Authors incur no fees for submission or publication, aligning with its mission to promote accessible scholarship. Print and online versions are available through university libraries and legal databases.
Submission Process and Guidelines
Submissions are accepted year-round via the Scholastica platform or email to the editors. Manuscripts should be double-spaced, anonymized, and between 10,000-25,000 words, following the Bluebook citation style. The review process takes 2-4 months, with decisions communicated promptly. Detailed guidelines are available on the official site: New York University Law Review. For submission tips, explore legal research positions.
Editorial Board Highlights
The editorial board comprises top NYU Law students, selected for their academic excellence and editorial skills. Led by an Editor-in-Chief, the team includes managing editors, articles editors, and notes editors who oversee the rigorous selection and editing process. Notable alumni have gone on to clerkships at the Supreme Court and prominent law firms.
Why Publish in New York University Law Review?
Publishing in the New York University Law Review offers prestige and exposure, enhancing career prospects for legal academics. Its articles are frequently cited in court opinions and policy papers, providing tangible impact. The journal's selective nature ensures association with elite scholarship, ideal for tenure-track faculty and practitioners seeking to influence legal thought.
Comparison with Similar Journals
The New York University Law Review compares favorably with peers in selectivity and influence.
| Journal | Founded | Acceptance Rate | Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York University Law Review | 1935 | ~5% | Broad legal affairs |
| Harvard Law Review | 1887 | ~6% | General law |
| Yale Law Journal | 1891 | ~4% | Interdisciplinary law |
| Columbia Law Review | 1901 | ~7% | Public policy |
Researcher Tips for Successful Submission
To succeed, craft a compelling abstract, ensure originality, and align with the journal's scope. Engage with recent issues for stylistic cues. Network via law conferences in our academic calendar. Revise based on feedback, and consider co-authorship for diverse perspectives. Persistence pays off in this competitive arena.