Performance Improvement Quarterly – Training Development Journal Guide for Researchers

Why Researchers Choose Performance Improvement Quarterly for High-Impact Publications

Performance Improvement Quarterly serves as a vital resource for scholars and practitioners in training development, providing a dedicated space to explore human performance technology and its applications. Established in 1988 by the International Society for Performance Improvement (ISPI), this Wiley-published journal has evolved into a cornerstone for research that bridges theory and practice in organizational performance. Researchers are drawn to its emphasis on evidence-based strategies that enhance workplace efficiency, employee development, and systemic improvements.

The journal's scope encompasses a wide array of topics, from instructional design and needs assessment to evaluation methodologies and change management. Articles often feature case studies, empirical research, and theoretical frameworks that address real-world challenges in training and development. With a commitment to interdisciplinary approaches, Performance Improvement Quarterly integrates insights from psychology, education, and management sciences, making it appealing to a diverse academic audience.

One key attraction is its rigorous yet supportive peer-review process, which ensures high-quality publications while offering constructive feedback to authors. The journal's quarterly publication schedule allows for timely dissemination of cutting-edge research, helping contributors stay ahead in the fast-paced field of performance improvement. Metrics such as its Scopus indexing highlight its visibility, with a CiteScore of 1.2 reflecting steady influence among peers.

For those in training development, publishing here not only elevates professional profiles but also contributes to practical advancements in industries like corporate training, healthcare, and education. The editorial board, comprising experts from leading institutions, upholds standards that align with global best practices. As open access options become more available through Wiley, accessibility for readers worldwide increases, amplifying the reach of published work.

Researchers often cite the journal's role in fostering collaborations between academia and industry, with articles frequently referenced in professional development programs. Whether exploring emerging technologies in learning or ethical considerations in performance interventions, Performance Improvement Quarterly provides a platform for impactful scholarship. To get started on your publication journey, consider reviewing current academic jobs in training development to network with potential collaborators.

Overview & History

Performance Improvement Quarterly was founded in 1988 under the auspices of the International Society for Performance Improvement, initially focusing on human performance technology (HPT). Over the decades, it has grown to address evolving needs in training and development, adapting to technological advancements and global workforce changes. Published by Wiley, the journal maintains a quarterly rhythm, releasing issues that compile peer-reviewed articles, book reviews, and special themed editions.

Its history reflects the maturation of the performance improvement field, from early emphases on behavioral analysis to contemporary explorations of AI-driven training solutions. Key milestones include the integration of online supplementary materials in the 2000s and enhanced digital accessibility via the Wiley Online Library. Today, it serves an international readership, with contributions from authors across North America, Europe, and Asia.

Scope and Disciplines Covered

The journal's scope centers on advancing knowledge in performance improvement through research, theory, and application. It welcomes submissions on topics such as performance analysis, intervention design, and outcome measurement, particularly in organizational contexts.

DisciplineDescription
Training DevelopmentFocuses on instructional strategies, e-learning, and employee skill enhancement.
Human Performance TechnologyEncompasses systemic approaches to improving individual and organizational performance.
Organizational DevelopmentExplores change management, culture building, and leadership training.
Instructional DesignCovers curriculum development, assessment tools, and technology integration in learning.
Evaluation and MeasurementAddresses metrics for training effectiveness and return on investment analysis.

These disciplines ensure a comprehensive coverage, appealing to researchers in education, business, and psychology. For more on related opportunities, check the PhD programs in organizational development.

Key Journal Metrics

MetricValueSource
CiteScore1.2Scopus
SJR0.25Scopus
h-Index28Scopus
Acceptance RateApproximately 30%Publisher Data
Average Review Time3-4 monthsEditorial Reports

These metrics underscore the journal's solid standing in training development, with steady citation growth. Impact factor is not publicly disclosed in Clarivate JCR.

Indexing and Abstracting

Performance Improvement Quarterly is indexed in several prestigious databases, enhancing its discoverability. Key inclusions are Scopus, EBSCO Education Source, and ProQuest Education Journals. It is also abstracted in ERIC and PsycINFO, making it accessible to education and psychology researchers. These listings ensure wide visibility; for instance, Scopus coverage dates back to 1996.

External links to databases: Scopus, Official Journal Homepage.

Publication Model and Fees

The journal operates on a hybrid model, offering both subscription-based and open access options through Wiley. Article Processing Charges (APCs) for open access are approximately $3,000 USD, with discounts available for ISPI members. Subscription access is provided via institutional licenses, ensuring broad readership. No page charges apply for standard submissions.

Submission Process and Guidelines

Submissions are handled through Wiley's ScholarOne Manuscripts portal. Authors must adhere to APA style, with manuscripts limited to 8,000 words. The process involves an initial editorial screening followed by double-blind peer review. Guidelines emphasize originality, practical implications, and ethical standards. For detailed instructions, visit the journal site.

Link to submission: ScholarOne Portal.

Editorial Board Highlights

The editorial team is led by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Katherine Hagen, an expert in HPT from the University of Minnesota. Other notable members include Dr. James Klein from Arizona State University, specializing in instructional systems, and international contributors like Dr. Yonjoo Cho from the University of Nebraska. Their diverse expertise ensures balanced, high-quality oversight.

Why Publish in Performance Improvement Quarterly?

Publishing here offers researchers visibility in a niche yet influential field, with opportunities for citation in professional practices. The journal's alignment with ISPI standards enhances credibility, and its practical focus appeals to industry readers. Contributors benefit from Wiley's global distribution network, reaching over 10 million users annually.

Internal tip: Pair your research with insights from Rate My Professor for training faculty to strengthen contextual relevance.

Comparison with Similar Journals

JournalPublisherFocusCiteScore
Performance ImprovementISPI/WileyPractitioner-oriented HPT0.8
Human Resource Development QuarterlyWileyHRD theory and practice2.5
Journal of Workplace LearningEmeraldWork-based education1.8
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesSAGEHRD innovations1.4

Performance Improvement Quarterly distinguishes itself with its deep HPT integration, offering more targeted scope than broader HRD journals.

Researcher Tips for Successful Submission

By focusing on these, authors increase acceptance chances. Explore higher ed jobs for performance specialists to apply your research.

Frequently Asked Questions about Performance Improvement Quarterly

πŸ“ˆWhat is the current impact factor of Performance Improvement Quarterly?

Performance Improvement Quarterly does not have a publicly disclosed impact factor in Clarivate JCR, but it holds a CiteScore of 1.2 in Scopus, indicating solid influence in training development. For career advancement, review academic jobs in training development to see how publications here boost profiles.

πŸ“ŠWhat is the acceptance rate for submissions?

The acceptance rate is approximately 30%, reflecting a selective yet accessible process for quality research in human performance technology. This makes it valuable for early-career researchers; check PhD programs in organizational development for aligned training.

πŸ’°What are the APCs and open access policies?

As a hybrid journal, APCs are around $3,000 USD for open access, with waivers for ISPI members. Subscription model is standard otherwise. This policy supports wider dissemination; explore higher ed jobs for performance specialists to leverage open access visibility.

⏱️How long does the peer review process take?

Review typically takes 3-4 months from submission to decision, ensuring thorough evaluation. This timeline aids timely publications; sync with your academic calendar for HPT conferences for networking.

πŸ“Where do I submit my manuscript?

Use the Wiley ScholarOne portal at mc.manuscriptcentral.com/piq for submissions. Guidelines require APA format and originality checks. For preparation, consult Rate My Professor for training faculty insights.

πŸ”Which databases index Performance Improvement Quarterly?

It is indexed in Scopus, EBSCO, ProQuest, ERIC, and PsycINFO, boosting discoverability. This enhances citation potential; pair with academic jobs in training development for broader impact.

πŸ‘₯Who is the Editor-in-Chief?

Dr. Katherine Hagen from the University of Minnesota leads as Editor-in-Chief, with expertise in HPT. Her guidance ensures relevance; learn from similar leaders via Rate My Professor for training faculty.

πŸš€How does publishing here benefit my career?

It elevates your profile in training development, aiding tenure and funding. The journal's prestige supports career growth; explore higher ed jobs for performance specialists post-publication.

βš–οΈHow does it compare to peer journals like HRDQ?

Compared to Human Resource Development Quarterly (CiteScore 2.5), PIQ offers more focused HPT content, ideal for specialized submissions. Differentiate your work; check PhD programs in organizational development for comparative studies.
Β