Why Researchers Choose Public Administration Review for High-Impact Publications
Public Administration Review stands as a cornerstone in the field of Political Science, offering researchers a platform to disseminate groundbreaking work on public policy and governance. Established in 1940 by the American Society for Public Administration, this journal has evolved into a vital resource for scholars, policymakers, and practitioners worldwide. With its rigorous peer-review process and commitment to advancing administrative theory and practice, Public Administration Review consistently ranks among the top outlets for impactful research. Its influence extends beyond academia, informing real-world decision-making in government and nonprofit sectors.
The journal's prestige is underscored by its inclusion in leading indexing services and a strong citation record. Researchers value Public Administration Review for its broad yet focused scope, covering topics from organizational behavior in public institutions to innovative policy solutions for contemporary challenges. Whether exploring fiscal management, ethical leadership, or equity in service delivery, contributors find an audience that appreciates nuanced, evidence-based analysis. The publication's hybrid model allows flexibility in access, ensuring wide dissemination while supporting open-access options for greater reach.
For those in Political Science and related disciplines, submitting to Public Administration Review means aligning with a legacy of excellence. The journal's editorial team, composed of distinguished experts, provides constructive feedback that enhances manuscript quality. Success stories abound of articles that shape debates and influence legislation. As the field grapples with issues like digital governance and sustainability, Public Administration Review remains at the forefront, inviting submissions that bridge theory and application.
To elevate your research career, consider exploring Political Science faculty positions after publication. This journal not only amplifies your voice but also connects you to a network of influential peers.
Overview & History
Public Administration Review was founded in 1940 as the official journal of the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). It emerged during a pivotal time when public administration was formalizing as a discipline amid the New Deal era's expansion of government roles. Over the decades, it has chronicled the evolution of administrative practices, from post-World War II bureaucracy reforms to modern responses to globalization and technological disruption.
The journal's mission has always been to foster dialogue between scholars and practitioners, publishing articles that blend empirical research with practical insights. Key milestones include its adoption of online publishing in the early 2000s and increasing emphasis on interdisciplinary approaches. Today, under Wiley's stewardship since 2009, Public Administration Review maintains bimonthly issues, ensuring timely dissemination of cutting-edge work. Its enduring relevance lies in addressing timeless questions of efficiency, accountability, and justice in public organizations.
Scope and Disciplines Covered
Public Administration Review encompasses a wide array of topics within public administration and policy. It prioritizes research that advances understanding of governmental operations, policy implementation, and administrative innovation. Contributions often draw from Political Science, but extend to sociology, economics, and law.
| Discipline | Description |
|---|---|
| Public Administration | Core focus on organizational theory, leadership, and management in public sectors. |
| Public Policy | Analysis of policy formulation, evaluation, and impacts on society. |
| Political Science | Exploration of governance structures, political behavior, and institutional dynamics. |
| Nonprofit Management | Insights into third-sector operations and collaboration with government. |
| Public Finance | Studies on budgeting, taxation, and fiscal policy effectiveness. |
This interdisciplinary scope makes it appealing for researchers tackling complex societal issues like inequality and environmental governance.
Key Journal Metrics
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Impact Factor (2023) | 6.1 | Clarivate Journal Citation Reports |
| 5-Year Impact Factor | 7.2 | Clarivate JCR |
| CiteScore | 8.9 | Scopus |
| h-Index | 142 | Scopus |
| Acceptance Rate | Not publicly disclosed | N/A |
These metrics highlight Public Administration Review's influence, with steady growth in citations reflecting its role in shaping discourse.
Indexing and Abstracting
Public Administration Review is indexed in prestigious databases, ensuring global visibility. It appears in Web of Science (Social Sciences Citation Index), Scopus, and ProQuest, among others. This coverage facilitates discoverability for researchers worldwide. For instance, articles are abstracted in PAIS International and JSTOR, aiding historical and comparative studies. Such indexing underscores the journal's credibility and accessibility in academic libraries.
Publication Model and Fees
As a hybrid journal published by Wiley, Public Administration Review offers both subscription-based and open-access options. Traditional publication is free for authors, with articles behind a paywall unless institutional access is available. For open access, authors pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) of $3,600, granting immediate free access under a Creative Commons license. No page charges apply. This model balances sustainability with broader dissemination, particularly valuable for policy-oriented research needing public impact.
Submission Process and Guidelines
Manuscripts are submitted via Wiley's ScholarOne platform at the journal's official site. Authors must adhere to APA style, with abstracts under 150 words and keywords limited to six. Originality is paramount; plagiarism checks are standard. The process involves initial editorial screening, followed by double-anonymized peer review, typically taking 3-6 months. Guidelines emphasize clarity, empirical rigor, and relevance to practice. For detailed instructions, visit the journal homepage.
Editorial Board Highlights
The editorial team is led by Editor-in-Chief Jos C.N. Raadschelders, a renowned scholar in public administration history. Associate editors include experts like Patricia M. Shields in methodology and Richard C. Box in democratic governance. This diverse board, spanning U.S. and international perspectives, ensures balanced, high-quality reviews. Their affiliations with top institutions like Ohio State University and the University of Kansas add prestige to the publication process.
Why Publish in Public Administration Review?
Publishing in Public Administration Review elevates a researcher's profile due to its high visibility and citation potential. The journal's readership includes academics, government officials, and NGO leaders, amplifying real-world influence. Its focus on actionable insights distinguishes it from purely theoretical outlets. Moreover, association with ASPA opens networking opportunities at conferences. For early-career scholars, a publication here signals expertise, aiding tenure and funding pursuits. Ultimately, it contributes to the field's advancement, fostering evidence-based public service improvements.
Comparison with Similar Journals
| Journal | Impact Factor | Focus | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Administration Review | 6.1 | Broad public admin and policy | Wiley |
| Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory | 7.8 | Theory and empirical methods | Oxford |
| Public Management Review | 5.4 | Management innovations | Taylor & Francis |
| Administration & Society | 3.2 | Social and organizational aspects | SAGE |
| Governance | 4.5 | Comparative politics and admin | Wiley |
This comparison shows Public Administration Review's competitive edge in impact and scope breadth.
Researcher Tips for Successful Submission
- Align your work with current themes like equity and digital transformation.
- Strengthen empirical foundations with robust data analysis.
- Engage practitioner implications explicitly in discussions.
- Seek feedback from peers before submission to refine arguments.
- Review recent issues for stylistic and topical fit.
- Utilize Rate My Professor for mentor insights on publication strategies.
Following these tips increases acceptance chances. For academic planning, check the academic calendar for deadlines.