Why Researchers Choose Review of Higher Education for High-Impact Publications

The Review of Higher Education stands as a cornerstone in the field of postsecondary education research, offering a platform for scholars to disseminate cutting-edge studies on academic leadership, policy, and institutional dynamics. Established in 1977, this quarterly journal, published by Johns Hopkins University Press, has built a reputation for rigorous scholarship that informs decision-making at the highest levels of universities and colleges. Researchers in higher education, particularly those focused on administrative roles like academic vice presidents, deputy vice-chancellors, and provosts, find it invaluable for addressing complex challenges such as governance, equity, and innovation in teaching and learning.

With a focus on empirical and theoretical work, the journal publishes articles that bridge research and practice, making it a go-to resource for leaders navigating the evolving landscape of higher education. Its impact factor of 2.8, as reported by Clarivate Journal Citation Reports for 2022, underscores its influence, placing it among the top outlets for education scholarship. The journal's scope encompasses a wide array of topics, from faculty development to student success metrics, ensuring relevance for professionals shaping institutional strategies.

Submitting to the Review of Higher Education provides opportunities for global dissemination, with articles indexed in major databases like Scopus and Web of Science. Authors benefit from a peer-reviewed process that enhances the quality and credibility of their work, often leading to citations in policy documents and academic discourse. For those in leadership positions, publishing here can amplify their voice in debates on funding, accreditation, and diversity initiatives.

The journal's commitment to open access options through hybrid models allows broader reach without compromising the subscription-based stability that supports in-depth research. Whether exploring the effects of administrative reforms or analyzing leadership in crisis management, contributors gain prestige and networking potential within the higher education community. As institutions face increasing scrutiny on outcomes and accountability, the insights from this journal remain essential.

To explore career opportunities that align with your research interests, consider browsing provost positions or academic leadership roles available through our directory.

Overview & History

The Review of Higher Education was founded in 1977 by the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), initially as a publication to foster dialogue on postsecondary issues. Over the decades, it has evolved into a flagship journal, now under the stewardship of Johns Hopkins University Press since 2001. This partnership has enhanced its production quality and distribution, reaching thousands of subscribers worldwide.

Key milestones include the introduction of online access in the early 2000s, which expanded its audience beyond print. The journal has published seminal works on topics like affirmative action, online learning, and administrative ethics, influencing policy at national levels. Today, it maintains a quarterly publication schedule, with each issue featuring 4-6 peer-reviewed articles, book reviews, and occasional special topics.

Scope and Disciplines Covered

The journal covers a broad spectrum of higher education topics, emphasizing research that informs leadership and policy. Primary areas include institutional governance, faculty affairs, student services, and equity in access.

Key Journal Metrics

The Review of Higher Education demonstrates strong performance in scholarly metrics, reflecting its quality and relevance.

Indexing and Abstracting

Articles in the Review of Higher Education are indexed in prestigious databases, ensuring wide discoverability. These include Web of Science (Social Sciences Citation Index), Scopus, ERIC, and ProQuest Education Journals. This coverage facilitates citations and accessibility for researchers globally. For more on academic tools, visit Rate My Professor to connect with peers.

Publication Model and Fees

As a hybrid journal, the Review of Higher Education operates primarily on a subscription model, with options for open access via author-paid fees. There is no mandatory Article Processing Charge (APC) for standard publication; however, authors opting for immediate open access pay approximately $3,000, as per publisher policies. This model supports sustainability while promoting accessibility. Sherpa/RoMEO classifies it as green open access compliant, allowing self-archiving after embargo.

Submission Process and Guidelines

Manuscripts are submitted electronically through the journal's online portal at the publisher's site. Guidelines require double-spaced, anonymized submissions of 8,000-10,000 words, following APA style. Initial review takes 2-3 months, with revisions possible. Focus on originality and relevance to higher education leadership. Detailed instructions are available on the official journal homepage.

Editorial Board Highlights

The editorial team is led by Editor-in-Chief Logan P. Quinley, an expert in higher education policy. Board members hail from top institutions like Harvard and UCLA, bringing diverse perspectives on administration and research. Their expertise ensures balanced, high-quality peer review.

Why Publish in Review of Higher Education?

Publishing here elevates a researcher's profile, with articles often cited in leadership training and policy briefs. The journal's prestige aids tenure and promotion, especially for those in provost or vice presidential roles. Its focus on practical implications makes it ideal for impactful scholarship. Explore related opportunities at academic calendar events.

Comparison with Similar Journals

The Review of Higher Education compares favorably to peers in scope and metrics.

Researcher Tips for Successful Submission

• Align your work with current calls, such as equity in leadership.
• Use robust methodologies, including mixed methods for policy analysis.
• Engage with recent issues for contextual relevance.
• Seek feedback from colleagues before submission.
• Highlight implications for academic vice presidents and provosts.

For job insights post-publication, check dean positions. Additional links: faculty development, policy jobs, provost search, leadership conferences, tenure track, administration roles.