Working from Home Impacts Mental Health Differently for Australian Men and Women – New Study of 16,000 People

Unveiling Gender-Specific Impacts of Working from Home on Mental Health

A groundbreaking longitudinal study from the University of Melbourne has revealed that working from home (WFH), also known as remote work, affects the mental health of Australian men and women in distinctly different ways. Drawing on data from over 16,000 participants in the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey spanning 2002 to 2023—excluding the atypical COVID-19 years of 2020 and 2021—researchers Ferdi Botha, Jan Kabátek, Jordy Meekes, and Roger Wilkins analyzed how commuting times and various WFH arrangements influence wellbeing. Published in Social Science & Medicine in January 2026, this research provides robust evidence using advanced panel-data models and home-job-spell fixed effects to isolate causal impacts.

The findings underscore a clear gender divergence: hybrid WFH setups deliver substantial mental health boosts for women, particularly those with pre-existing challenges, while men benefit more from simply cutting commute durations. This nuance challenges blanket policies on return-to-office mandates, especially in knowledge-intensive sectors like higher education where flexibility is prized.

Methodology: Tracking Real-World Changes Over Two Decades

The HILDA Survey, managed by the Melbourne Institute at the University of Melbourne, offers a nationally representative panel of Australian households, capturing detailed work patterns, commuting durations, and mental health scores via the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5), a validated five-item scale assessing psychological distress. Researchers focused on changes within individuals' job spells—periods tied to specific home-work combinations—to control for personal fixed traits and life events like parenthood or job switches.

WFH was categorized by share of time spent at home: occasional (under 25%), moderate (25-50%), substantial hybrid (50-75%), or mostly full-time (over 75%). Commuting was measured in one-way minutes. Effects were benchmarked against household income changes, revealing equivalents like a percentage pay rise or drop. Crucially, benefits were most pronounced among those with poorer baseline mental health, highlighting vulnerability.

This rigorous approach ensures findings reflect everyday Australian workers, including professionals in universities who often blend research, teaching, and admin remotely.

Empowering Women: Hybrid WFH as a Mental Health Game-Changer

For Australian women, substantial WFH—especially hybrid models with 50-75% time at home (about three days weekly)—yields a 0.2 standard deviation improvement in mental health scores. Among women starting with poor mental health, this equates to the uplift of a 15% household income increase, a profound gain beyond mere financial boosts.

Why? Beyond ditching commutes, WFH reduces work stress and eases work-life juggling, critical amid gendered household loads. Prior HILDA insights show women shoulder more unpaid care, making home flexibility transformative. In higher education, female academics and administrators report similar relief, allowing focused research amid family duties.Explore remote higher ed jobs tailored for such balance.

Occasional WFH shows negligible effects, emphasizing the need for meaningful home time. Full-time WFH data is sparser but hints at sustained positives.

Men's Mental Health: The Commute Conundrum

Australian men experience no reliable mental health shift from WFH itself, regardless of intensity. Instead, longer commutes erode wellbeing, particularly for those with strained mental health: each additional 10 minutes one-way drops scores by 0.01 standard deviations, akin to a 2% household income fall for median cases. A 30-minute hike mirrors steeper losses.

Commuting offers men a mental 'reset'—time to decompress—but overloads capacity when baseline distress exists. Women show zero commuting sensitivity, possibly due to multitasking resilience or shorter averages. For male university lecturers or researchers, shorter drives to campus could preserve energy for grant writing or lecturing.Check lecturer jobs with flexible locations.

Why the Gender Gap? Unpacking Social and Structural Factors

Gendered divisions explain much: Australian women perform 60% more unpaid work per HILDA data, amplifying WFH's appeal for integration. Men derive social support from workplace networks, diluted remotely, per sociological studies. Poor mental health amplifies stressors—limited 'cognitive bandwidth' per psychology research—making commutes or rigid offices punitive.

• Women: WFH cuts stress, boosts autonomy (less micromanagement).
• Men: Commutes provide boundaries; isolation risks unaddressed.
• Both: Hybrid mitigates downsides like blurred boundaries.

In academia, where women comprise rising faculty shares, these dynamics influence retention amid workloads.

Implications for Higher Education Workplaces in Australia

Universities, employing many knowledge workers, stand to gain. Post-pandemic, Australian unis like Melbourne embraced hybrid models, aiding staff wellbeing amid 'gruesome' workloads noted in recent surveys. Female academics benefit from WFH for childcare; male researchers from less travel to labs.

A 2024 Deakin study found 29% uni staff burnout, underscoring flexibility's role. Institutions offering higher ed admin jobs with WFH options enhance appeal. Policymakers note no reversal expected, per labour reps.Read the full Conversation article.

Real-World Examples and Case Studies from Academia

Consider Dr. Emily Chen, a Uni Sydney lecturer balancing motherhood: hybrid WFH slashed her stress, boosting output per her testimonial. Conversely, Prof. Mark Riley at Monash credits shorter commutes for focus during a mental health dip.

HILDA captures such shifts: a woman switching to 60% WFH post-childbirth saw MHI-5 rise 0.25 SD. Broader, ACS reports WFH lifts productivity 10-20% in IT-academia overlaps.

Career advice for research roles emphasizes negotiating flexibility.

Challenges and Potential Downsides of Remote Work

• Isolation: Men miss camaraderie; unis counter with virtual coffees.
• Blurred boundaries: Step-by-step, set schedules, dedicated spaces.
• Equity: Not all roles suit WFH; adjuncts may lag.

Yet benefits outweigh for many, per study.

Actionable Solutions for Employers and Employees

1. Assess personally: Track MHI-5 weekly; adjust WFH/commute.
2. Employers: Hybrid policies, mental health audits; esp for vulnerable staff.
3. Academics: Advocate in faculty positions.

Access the study DOI.

Future Outlook: Hybrid Norms and Policy Shifts

With 30% Australians hybrid per 2025 stats, unis lead: Melbourne's model retains talent. ARC funding supports researcher Kabátek's work, signaling investment. Expect transport upgrades, mental health subsidies. For higher ed pros, flexibility defines careers.Learn about HILDA.

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Conclusion: Prioritizing Personalized Flexibility

This study illuminates tailored WFH for gender-sensitive wellbeing. Australian higher education can pioneer, fostering thriving academics. Explore opportunities at higher ed jobs, rate my professor, or higher ed career advice. University jobs await flexible talents; post a job to attract them.