Photo by Aditya Enggar Perdana on Unsplash
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), where technological advancements outpace regulatory frameworks, a groundbreaking article from researchers at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) underscores the pivotal role universities must play. Published in the prestigious Futures journal in February 2026, the paper titled "Universidades como atores estratégicos na governança antecipatória e uso responsável de IA" (Universities as Strategic Actors in Anticipatory Governance and Responsible AI Use) proposes innovative frameworks to position higher education institutions as proactive shapers of AI's future.
Authored by experts from UFRGS's IEA Future Lab, including Raquel Janissek-Muniz and Mateus Panizzon, the study emerges at a critical juncture for Brazil. As the nation implements its Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial (PBIA 2024-2028)—"AI for the Good of All"—aiming to foster ethical innovation amid global uncertainties, universities are called to lead. This publication not only analyzes challenges but offers actionable tools like a four-pillar framework and a five-stage maturity model, making it essential reading for academics, policymakers, and AI professionals in Brazil's higher education sector.
The article's timing aligns with heightened discussions on AI ethics, following events like the ANDIFES seminar on federal universities' contributions to PBIA, highlighting gaps in coordination and infrastructure while emphasizing universities' strengths in talent development and research.
Understanding Anticipatory Governance in the AI Era
Anticipatory governance refers to proactive strategies that anticipate future technological impacts, risks, and opportunities rather than reacting post-facto. In AI contexts, it involves foresight methods—systematic processes to scan weak signals, scenario planning, and stakeholder engagement—to ensure responsible development. Unlike traditional regulation, it emphasizes agility, ethics, and inclusivity, drawing from futures studies to navigate uncertainties like algorithmic bias, job displacement, and environmental costs.
For Brazil, where AI adoption is accelerating—projected to add US$260 billion to GDP by 2030 per PBIA estimates—this approach is vital. Universities, with their multidisciplinary expertise, bridge theory and practice, fostering ecosystems that integrate AI with societal values. The UFRGS article positions them as 'strategic actors,' capable of influencing policy through knowledge generation and public discourse.
The Four-Pillar Framework for University Leadership
Central to the UFRGS study is a framework built on four pillars: knowledge production, training (formação), stakeholder engagement, and public policy expertise. Knowledge production involves research on AI trends, such as generative models' role in foresight, as explored in related UFRGS theses using tools like ChatGPT for scenario analysis.
- Knowledge: Conducting horizon scanning and weak signal detection to inform AI strategies.
- Training: Developing curricula for AI ethics and foresight, addressing Brazil's need for 500,000+ AI-skilled professionals by 2028 (PBIA).
- Engagement: Collaborating with industry and government, as in UFRGS's partnerships.
- Policy Expertise: Advising on regulations like Brazil's AI Bill, ensuring inclusivity.
This structure empowers resource-limited universities to amplify impact within broader ecosystems.
UFRGS IEA Future Lab: Driving Foresight Innovation
The IEA Future Lab at UFRGS, led by Prof. Raquel Janissek-Muniz, specializes in inteligência estratégica antecipativa (anticipatory strategic intelligence). Recent missions to Portugal and Asia have strengthened global ties, while theses under her guidance demonstrate AI's potential in foresight, reducing uncertainty through big data analysis.
UFRGS ranks among Brazil's top AI publishers, contributing 802 papers (EBIA report), positioning it as a leader. The lab's work exemplifies how universities can prototype maturity models, assessing readiness from basic awareness to advanced AI-integrated governance.
Professionals interested in such research can explore research jobs or academic CV tips on AcademicJobs.com.
Brazil's National AI Strategy and Universities' Role
The PBIA outlines five axes: infrastructure, talent, innovation, governance/ethics, and applications, with R$1.76 billion invested by 2028 for public services. Universities are central to talent formation and ethical governance, as debated by ANDIFES, which formed a commission for infrastructure, training, business innovation, and regulation.
Federal universities like USP (leading AI publications) and UFABC host centers aligning with PBIA, developing referentials for ethical AI use compliant with LGPD. Challenges include regional inequalities, but opportunities abound in health (SUS AI governance) and education.Read the full PBIA (PDF).
Photo by Fabian Lozano on Unsplash
The Five-Stage Maturity Model Explained
The article's maturity model progresses in five stages:
- Awareness: Recognizing AI uncertainties.
- Exploration: Basic foresight adoption.
- Integration: Embedding four pillars.
- Optimization: AI-augmented processes.
- Leadership: Influencing national policy.
This step-by-step tool helps universities self-assess, vital for Brazil's 200+ federal institutions facing budget constraints.
| Stage | Key Indicators | AI Integration Level |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 | Reactive planning | Low |
| 3-4 | Proactive scenarios | Medium-High |
| 5 | Policy influence | Advanced |
Case Studies: Brazilian Universities in Action
UFRGS exemplifies through IEA Lab's AI-foresight theses, while USP's Roseli Figaro leads PBIA discussions. Unicamp and UFMG develop AI ethics guidelines. A recent UFC study urges ecological accountability in AI, analyzing tech giants' greenwashing.
- UFPA: AI for university management.
- ANDIFES network: Mapping AI experts.
These cases show universities mitigating risks like bias (affecting 40% of global AI models) via diverse data.
Related: INEP evaluates higher ed innovations.Challenges: Resource Constraints and Ethical Dilemmas
Despite potential, Brazilian universities face funding cuts (20% real-term decline 2015-2025) and infrastructure gaps. Ethical issues—privacy, bias, sustainability (AI data centers consume 2% global electricity)—demand vigilance. The UFRGS model addresses this by leveraging ecosystems.
Stakeholders: Government pushes PBIA; industry seeks talent; students demand skills. Balanced views from experts stress human oversight in AI.
Future Outlook: Towards AI Leadership in 2030
By 2030, Brazil aims for top-10 global AI innovation. Universities adopting the UFRGS frameworks could lead, influencing BRICS AI governance. Actionable insights: Invest in hybrid AI-human foresight; expand PhD programs; partner internationally.
Implications: New careers in AI ethics, foresight analysts. Check Brazil higher ed jobs or research assistant roles.
Implications for Higher Education Professionals
This research signals demand for foresight experts. Brazil needs 100,000 AI specialists annually; universities must upskill faculty. Career advice: Pursue certifications in responsible AI; join labs like IEA.
Visit Rate My Professor for insights or career advice.
Photo by Samuel Costa Melo on Unsplash
Conclusion: Universities Shaping Responsible AI Futures
The UFRGS Futures article is a call to action: Universities aren't bystanders but architects of ethical AI. By embracing anticipatory governance, Brazil's higher ed can drive inclusive innovation. Engage via university jobs, higher ed jobs, career advice, rate professors, and post jobs.
Discussion
0 comments from the academic community
Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.