Photo by Randy Laybourne on Unsplash
Understanding the Scope of Firearm-Related Injuries and Mortality in Canada
Firearm-related injuries and deaths represent a significant public health challenge in Canada, contributing to preventable premature mortality. Despite stringent gun control measures compared to many countries, Canada ranks third among G7 nations in age-adjusted firearm-related mortality rates.
Urban centers bear much of the burden, with cities like Toronto recording 461 shootings and firearm discharges in 2024, a 33.6% increase from the previous year, alongside 43 gun-related deaths.
The New Study: Methodology and Expert Consensus Building
The landmark study, "Closing the knowledge gap: identifying research priorities for firearm-related injury and mortality in Canada," published in January 2026 in Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada, employs a rigorous two-stage nominal group technique to pinpoint knowledge gaps.
Stage 2, held during the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences forum "Gun Violence is a Public Health Issue" in Toronto on September 27-28, 2023, involved 43 stakeholders voting anonymously using weighted scores (top priority = 5 points). This process yielded a ranked list of priorities, marking the first national effort to establish a firearm injury research agenda in Canada.
Top Research Priorities Emerging from Expert Analysis
The highest-ranked priority is quantifying the economic cost of firearm injuries to victims' families, communities, and broader Canadian society (weighted score 4.1). A 2008 Justice Canada report estimated firearm-related crime costs at over CAD 3.1 billion annually, but this excluded suicides and unintentional injuries, likely underestimating the true figure.
- Impact of social policies and legislation on reducing IPV/femicide-related firearm injuries and deaths (score 4.0), critical given IPV accounts for 15% of firearm victimizations where women and girls are disproportionately affected.
- Description of available and required Canadian firearm-injury data, including collection barriers (score 3.8), addressing fragmented silos across health, justice, and police databases.
- Support needs for survivors and families post-injury/death (score 3.7), including mental health service utilization patterns.
- Risk factors placing individuals in high-risk situations and early IPV indicators (scores 3.7).
Other priorities include rural vs. urban impacts, safe storage barriers, social media's role in assaults, and child access protection law enforcement.Read the full study here.
University Researchers Leading the Charge
Canadian higher education institutions are at the forefront, with lead author Dr. Lotus Alphonsus affiliated with ICES and Western University, and co-authors from the University of Toronto (Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health Policy), Dalhousie University (Community Health and Epidemiology), University of New Brunswick (Sociology), Toronto Metropolitan University (Entrepreneurship and Strategy, Community Services), University of Ottawa (Criminology), Saint Mary's University (History), and more.
For aspiring researchers, opportunities abound in public health and injury prevention programs at these universities. Explore research jobs or research assistant positions to contribute to addressing these gaps. Programs like those at University of Toronto's Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work have produced reports highlighting racial disparities in gun violence, urging trauma-informed responses.
Recent Trends and Statistics Shaping the Research Landscape
Firearm-related homicides increased 89% since 2013, with handguns involved in 56% of 2023 cases (289 total).
| Region | Firearm Crime Rate 2023 (per 100k) | Change 2022-2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Territories | 180 | +9.4% |
| Provincial Rural North | 165 | +6.5% |
| Saskatchewan | 127 | N/A |
| Urban South | 32 | -6.5% |
Such data variability highlights the need for standardized national surveillance, a key priority.Discover university opportunities across Canada.
Policy Implications and Legislative Evaluations
Priorities emphasize evaluating policies like Bill C-21, which targets handguns and assault-style firearms, amid debates on its impact on IPV and femicide. While past laws reduced long-gun homicides, recent smuggled handgun surges complicate effects. Research must assess red flag laws, storage mandates, and their IPV reductions.
Challenges in Data Collection and Knowledge Gaps
Fragmented data—siloed in health, criminal justice, and police systems—impedes research. Inconsistent definitions, missing demographics, and underreported nonfatal injuries (three per death in Ontario, 2002-2016) persist. Only 34 peer-reviewed firearm studies in Canada over 18 years pre-2019 signals chronic underfunding.
- Lack of linked administrative data.
- Qualitative gaps on social determinants.
- No national registry for nonfatal injuries.
Addressing these could enable robust epidemiological modeling.
Stakeholder Perspectives: From Communities to Policymakers
Victim advocates stress post-trauma support, while rural communities highlight storage barriers. Urban gang violence demands upstream interventions. University-led forums like the 2023 CAHS event foster dialogue, aligning research with lived experiences.
Check career advice for academic researchers in public health.
Future Outlook: Opportunities for Higher Education and Actionable Insights
Operationalizing priorities—via CIHR grants or SSHRC funding—offers avenues for postdoctoral and faculty roles. Universities can lead RCTs on interventions, economic modeling, and data infrastructures. For students, scholarships in public health align with national agendas.
Communities benefit from evidence-based programs; policymakers from cost-benefit analyses.
Photo by Chase McBride on Unsplash
Call to Action for Researchers and Educators
This study galvanizes Canadian academia to fill gaps, reducing the CAD billions in societal costs. Explore professor ratings in epidemiology, higher ed jobs, or career advice. Share insights in comments below and advance safer communities.
Discussion
0 comments from the academic community
Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.