Academic Jobs - Home of Higher Ed Logo

Black Adults in Canada 75% More Likely to Skip Medications Due to Cost: New CMAJ Study Reveals

Submit News
black and white wooden wall decor
Photo by Jon Tyson on Unsplash

Understanding the CMAJ Study on Cost-Related Prescription Nonadherence

The Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) recently published a pivotal study examining disparities in cost-related prescription nonadherence between Black and White adults in Canada. Titled "Disparities in cost-related prescription nonadherence between Black and White adults in Canada," this research draws from five cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) spanning 2015 to 2022. Researchers led by Bukola Salami from the University of Calgary analyzed data from adults aged 18 and older who self-identified as Black or White, providing national-level insights into how financial barriers affect medication adherence.

Cost-related prescription nonadherence, often abbreviated as CRNA, refers to behaviors such as not filling a prescription, delaying a refill, skipping doses, or taking smaller doses than prescribed because of out-of-pocket costs. This issue is particularly concerning in Canada, where while healthcare is universal through the Canada Health Act, prescription drugs are not covered nationally, leaving many to rely on private insurance, provincial plans, or personal funds.

Key Findings: 75% Higher Prevalence Among Black Adults

The study revealed stark disparities. In 2015, 15.3% of Black adults reported CRNA compared to 6% of White adults. By 2022, these rates had declined slightly to 9.5% for Black adults and 5.5% for White adults, yet the gap persisted. Overall, the prevalence of CRNA was 75% higher among Black adults than White adults, even after adjusting for factors like age, sex, education, household income, number of chronic conditions, self-perceived health, and having a regular healthcare provider.

Prescription drug coverage rates further highlight inequities: in 2015, 71.6% of Black adults had coverage versus 83% of White adults; by 2022, it was 72.5% versus 80%. Insurance significantly reduced CRNA for both groups, but Black adults remained at higher risk independently of coverage, suggesting deeper systemic issues such as employment discrimination affecting insurance access through employer plans.

Line graph showing CRNA prevalence trends for Black and White adults in Canada from 2015-2022 from CMAJ study

Methodology and Data Robustness

The researchers used repeated cross-sectional data from Statistics Canada's CCHS, a nationally representative survey conducted every two years. Respondents were asked if, in the past 12 months, they did any of the following due to cost: did not fill a prescription, delayed filling or refilling, skipped doses, or took less medication. The sample included thousands of Black and White respondents across provinces, weighted for population representation.

Multivariable logistic regression models assessed crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR). Factors partially mediated the disparity, including lower income, fewer chronic conditions reported (possibly underdiagnosis), poorer self-perceived health, and lack of insurance. However, Black racial identity retained statistical significance (adjusted OR approximately 1.5-1.75 across models), indicating unmeasured factors like racism or mistrust in healthcare.

Broader Context of Racial Health Disparities in Canada

Black Canadians face disproportionate chronic disease burdens. They experience higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, and HIV/AIDS mortality. Nonadherence exacerbates these, leading to poorer control, hospitalizations, and mortality. For instance, uncontrolled hypertension increases stroke risk by 4-6 times.

Systemic racism contributes: studies show Black patients receive fewer referrals, experience discrimination, and have less trust in providers. Geographic barriers in underserved neighborhoods and financial instability from wage gaps compound issues. A 2024 CMAJ study found overall CRNA at 4.9%, with racial minorities 20-67% more likely.

canada text overlay on black background

Photo by Andy Holmes on Unsplash

Trends Over Time and Insurance Gaps

  • CRNA declined for both groups, possibly due to provincial expansions like Ontario's Trillium Drug Program or pandemic-era supports.
  • Black coverage stagnated around 72%, while White dipped slightly, perhaps market shifts.
  • Younger adults (18-34) and low-income households showed highest CRNA across races.

Employment-based insurance disadvantages precarious workers, overrepresented among Black communities due to discrimination.

Health Impacts of Nonadherence

CRNA leads to disease progression, emergency visits, and higher long-term costs. For Black Canadians with hypertension, skipping meds raises cardiovascular events by 30-50%. Diabetes nonadherence doubles complication risks like kidney failure. A prior study estimated free meds save $1641-$4465 per patient over 3 years via better outcomes.

Real-world example: In Toronto's Black communities, qualitative reports describe prioritizing rent/food over meds, leading to avoidable hospitalizations.

Policy Landscape: Pharmacare and Equity

Canada's Pharmacare Act (2024) aims for universal coverage starting with contraceptives/diabetes meds, bilateral deals with provinces. Yet, only 20% covered so far; full rollout uncertain post-2025 election. Experts like Salami urge equity: race-based data collection (e.g., PEI, NS), culturally safe dispensing, subsidies for uninsured.

Federal pharmacare updates highlight need for Black community input to avoid exacerbating gaps.

Solutions and Interventions

  • Universal pharmacare without copays/deductibles.
  • Expand provincial plans targeting racialized groups.
  • Community pharmacies offering navigation, generics counseling.
  • Anti-racism training for providers, trust-building initiatives.
  • Race/ethnicity data in health records for targeted interventions.

U.S. studies show copay caps boost adherence 10-20% in minorities; adaptable to Canada. Patient-provider concordance improves adherence by 15%.

Stakeholder Perspectives

Salami: "We need pharmacare based on need, not ability to pay." CMAJ editorial calls for urgent action amid rising drug costs. Black health advocates note employment racism limits coverage. Policymakers reference study in pharmacare debates.

Infographic on pharmacare coverage gaps for Black Canadians

Future Outlook and Research Needs

As pharmacare expands (target Jan 2026 for some), monitor impact on CRNA. Needed: longitudinal studies, intervention trials, qualitative Black voices. Higher ed role: train diverse pharmacists/public health experts. Universities like U Calgary lead equity research.

Optimistic: Declining trends suggest progress; equity-focused pharmacare could close gaps by 2030.

Read the full CMAJ study
Portrait of Dr. Elena Ramirez
About the author

Dr. Elena RamirezView author

Academic Jobs In House Author

Discussion

Sort by:

Be the first to comment on this article!

You

Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

New0 comments

Join the conversation!

Add your comments now!

Have your say

Engagement level

Browse by Faculty

Browse by Subject

Frequently Asked Questions

💊What is cost-related prescription nonadherence?

Cost-related prescription nonadherence (CRNA) occurs when individuals skip doses, delay refills, or avoid filling prescriptions due to affordability issues. In Canada, it affects chronic disease management significantly.

📊How much higher is CRNA among Black adults per the CMAJ study?

The study found a 75% higher prevalence among Black adults (9.5% in 2022) compared to White adults (5.5%). Rates dropped over time but the gap persists. Full study here.

🛡️Why do Black Canadians have lower prescription coverage?

Only 72.5% of Black adults had coverage in 2022 vs 80% White, linked to employment disparities, precarious jobs, and systemic racism limiting employer benefits.

❤️What health impacts does nonadherence cause?

It worsens hypertension, diabetes, CVD, increasing hospitalizations and mortality. Black communities already bear higher chronic disease burdens.

🏥How does pharmacare address these disparities?

The 2024 Pharmacare Act starts universal coverage for select drugs; experts urge equity focus, race-data, to benefit Black communities disproportionately affected.

🔍What factors mediate the racial gap in adherence?

Income, education, chronic conditions, health perception, insurance partially explain; Black identity independently associated post-adjustment.

📈Trends in CRNA rates from 2015-2022?

Black: 15.3% to 9.5%; White: 6% to 5.5%. Provincial expansions helped, but gaps remain.

⚖️Role of systemic racism in medication access?

Discrimination leads to mistrust, fewer prescriptions, barriers in care; contributes beyond economics.

💡Proposed interventions for equity?

Universal no-copay pharmacare, targeted subsidies, pharmacy navigation, provider training, race-based data collection.

🎓How can universities contribute to solutions?

Research on interventions, train diverse health professionals, advocate policy; jobs in public health research available.

⚠️Study limitations?

Self-reported data, cross-sectional (no causality), voluntary race ID may undercount Black respondents.