Subscribe-to-Open models are reshaping how US universities and colleges expand access to scholarly research. These innovative approaches allow academic libraries to maintain familiar subscription processes while enabling entire journal volumes to become freely available online when participation thresholds are met.
How Subscribe-to-Open Models Operate in Practice
The Subscribe-to-Open (S2O) model works through collective library support. Publishers invite existing subscribers to renew at standard rates. If sufficient institutions participate, the publisher converts that year’s content to open access immediately upon publication, with no article processing charges for authors. This approach avoids the administrative burdens of individual payments and promotes equity by removing financial barriers for readers and researchers worldwide.
US academic libraries appreciate the continuity with established procurement workflows. No new contracts or complex negotiations are typically required beyond standard renewals. When thresholds are reached, content opens to everyone, including institutions that may not have subscribed previously.
Leading US Institutions Embracing S2O
University of Florida Libraries actively support multiple S2O journals, securing discounts on subscriptions while ensuring corresponding authors at the institution can publish without out-of-pocket costs. Iowa State University participates in S2O programs from publishers including the American Physiological Society and the American Society for Microbiology, aligning library investments with broader open access goals. Michigan State University Libraries similarly backs S2O initiatives from several publishers, including those from the American Library Association’s CORE division.
These examples illustrate how S2O integrates into routine library operations at public research universities across the country. Participation often complements other open access strategies, such as transformative agreements, without replacing them entirely.
Publisher Adoption and Scale in the United States
The American Physiological Society announced its shift to S2O for ten primary research journals beginning in 2025, emphasizing cost neutrality and collaboration with the library community. Annual Reviews has successfully converted volumes from 2023 through 2025 to open access via S2O, reporting two- to three-fold increases in global readership. Broader data indicate 347 journals from 55 publishers now operate under S2O frameworks, with strong involvement from North American institutions and societies.
Learned societies and university presses based in or serving the US have been early adopters, viewing the model as a sustainable bridge to wider open access without introducing author-side fees.
Photo by diana kereselidze on Unsplash
Measurable Impacts on Research Reach and Submissions
Institutions and publishers report tangible benefits. One society publisher observed article downloads rising 3.5 times in the first quarter after flipping to open access compared to the prior year. Submissions increased by 16 percent in the same period, with notable growth from North American researchers. Usage has expanded in the United States alongside other regions, demonstrating the model’s effectiveness at broadening access while sustaining or growing author engagement.
These outcomes align with goals of US research funders and institutions seeking greater visibility for scholarship produced on campus.
Equity and Accessibility Advantages for US Campuses
S2O prioritizes equity by eliminating article processing charges, allowing authors from all institutions—regardless of funding availability—to publish openly. Readers at under-resourced colleges, community colleges, and international partners gain immediate access without paywalls. This approach supports compliance with funder mandates while reducing financial pressures on authors and libraries alike.
US academic administrators note the model’s alignment with institutional missions of public service and knowledge dissemination, particularly at land-grant and public universities.
Challenges and Considerations for Long-Term Sustainability
While promising, S2O faces questions around long-term viability. Some observers highlight risks if individual libraries cancel subscriptions, potentially undermining collective thresholds. Budget pressures at US institutions and competing priorities can influence participation rates. Publishers and libraries continue to monitor thresholds and adjust offerings to maintain momentum.
Survey data from the Association of College and Research Libraries indicate that nearly 30 percent of responding academic libraries support S2O or similar open access funding models, reflecting growing but not universal adoption.
Future Outlook for Open Access at US Institutions
As more publishers experiment with S2O and thresholds are consistently met, the model is expected to expand further. US libraries are likely to integrate it more deeply into collection strategies alongside other open initiatives. Continued success could accelerate the shift away from traditional subscription-only models, increasing the proportion of openly available research from American scholars.
Stakeholders anticipate ongoing refinement, with emphasis on transparent reporting of participation and outcomes to build confidence across the higher education sector.
Photo by Jennifer Bonauer on Unsplash
Implications for Academics, Administrators, and Emerging Scholars
Faculty and researchers benefit from wider readership and citation potential without additional costs. University administrators gain tools to advance open access goals within existing budgets. PhD students and early-career academics see expanded opportunities for their work to reach diverse audiences, supporting career development in an increasingly open scholarly environment.
These developments underscore the evolving landscape of academic publishing and the role of collaborative models in sustaining high-quality research dissemination.