The Growing Pressure on Australian University Classrooms
Australian higher education has long prided itself on delivering quality learning experiences that prepare graduates for successful careers. Yet recent developments show that the fundamental building blocks of that experience, the small-group tutorials where much of the real learning happens, are under significant strain. Enrolments have surged in recent years while funding models have shifted, creating conditions where class sizes have grown dramatically. This situation affects not only the daily work of academics and tutors but also the depth of engagement students can achieve during their studies.
Universities across the country operate in a competitive environment where international student fees and domestic enrolments help sustain operations. When revenue pressures mount, one common response has been to increase the number of students per class. What was once a standard tutorial of around fifteen students can now routinely exceed thirty, with some reaching fifty or more. The result is a noticeable change in how teaching and learning unfold on campuses from Perth to Brisbane.
Revealing the Scale Through Comprehensive Staff Input
A major national survey conducted by the National Tertiary Education Union gathered responses from more than four thousand university staff members. The exercise compared current tutorial and lecture experiences with those from 2019, the last full year before major disruptions from the pandemic and changes to the domestic funding framework took full effect. Respondents spanned academic roles, professional staff, and casual tutors across dozens of institutions.
The findings painted a consistent picture. Sixty-two percent of those surveyed reported that tutorial sizes had increased over the period. Workshops and laboratory classes showed similar patterns of growth. The data highlighted a clear shift away from the smaller, more interactive groups that many educators consider essential for effective learning in disciplines ranging from humanities to sciences and health fields.
Understanding Ideal Tutorial Sizes and Current Realities
Educational research consistently points to ten to nineteen students as the optimal range for tutorials. In these settings, participants can actively contribute, receive timely feedback, and build connections with peers and instructors. Smaller numbers allow tutors to tailor explanations, monitor progress closely, and address individual questions without feeling rushed.
Today more than half of Australian university tutorials host thirty or more students. Over one in ten now fall into the fifty to one hundred student bracket, a sharp rise from roughly five percent in 2019. These larger groups change the dynamic entirely. Discussions become harder to manage, quieter students may disengage, and the opportunity for personalised guidance diminishes. Lecturers and tutors describe adapting by using more group activities or online tools, yet many note that the core interactive element of tutorials suffers.
Impacts Felt Directly by Students
The effects on learners are both immediate and long term. Staff observed worsening student engagement and learning outcomes in seventy-eight percent of cases. More than half noted declining satisfaction scores in formal evaluations. Equity students, including those from regional backgrounds, first-in-family attendees, and those managing additional responsibilities, appear particularly disadvantaged. In larger classes these students can slip through the cracks more easily, missing out on the encouragement or clarification they might otherwise seek in a smaller setting.
Real-world accounts illustrate the point. Some students report sitting on floors in overcrowded lectures or waiting weeks for individual consultations that were once routine. Others describe feeling hesitant to approach busy staff because they sense the pressure everyone is under. The personal touch that once characterised university study is becoming rarer, leading to concerns about overall graduate preparedness and satisfaction with the higher education investment.
Strain on Academic and Professional Staff
Behind the numbers lies a human story of increased workload and reduced job satisfaction. Tutors report preparing the same material for bigger groups while fielding more emails and requests for extensions. Marking loads grow, and the time available for one-on-one mentoring shrinks. Many describe the situation as unsustainable, particularly for those on casual or fixed-term contracts who already navigate uncertain employment conditions.
Professional staff supporting student services also feel the ripple effects. With larger cohorts needing more administrative support, queues lengthen and response times slow. The emotional labour of reassuring anxious students adds to the daily demands. Across the sector there is a sense that the quality of the student experience is being traded against volume, with staff bearing much of the hidden cost.
Photo by Martin David on Unsplash
Funding Models and Policy Context Driving Change
The Job Ready Graduates package, introduced several years ago, altered the way domestic student places are funded and created incentives for universities to maximise enrolments in certain fields. Combined with broader fiscal pressures and the ongoing importance of international student revenue, the environment encourages efficiency measures that often translate into larger classes. Universities have also responded to rising domestic demand by over-enrolling in some areas ahead of potential caps.
These policy choices occur against a backdrop of public debate about the value and cost of degrees. As average fees edge higher, expectations around the quality of delivery naturally increase. The tension between financial sustainability and educational quality sits at the heart of the current challenge for institutional leaders, government policymakers, and the wider community.
Perspectives from Across the Higher Education Community
Union representatives have highlighted the survey as evidence that chronic underfunding leaves universities with difficult choices. They argue that sustainable staffing ratios and appropriate class sizes should be non-negotiable for maintaining standards. University executives, while acknowledging the data, often point to the need for diversified income and the realities of delivering education at scale in a large country.
Student organisations have echoed concerns about engagement and support. Many students value the social and intellectual connections formed in smaller tutorials and worry that larger groups dilute the university experience. Independent experts in pedagogy stress that while technology can help manage bigger cohorts, it cannot fully replace the benefits of well-resourced small-group teaching.
Exploring Practical Responses and Innovations
Some institutions are trialling hybrid models that combine larger lectures with smaller breakout sessions or enhanced online components. Others are investing in additional tutor training to help staff manage bigger groups effectively. Peer-assisted study programs and structured group work have shown promise in maintaining interaction levels even when numbers rise.
At the policy level there is discussion about reviewing funding formulas to better support quality teaching. Proposals include targeted investment in teaching-focused roles, clearer national benchmarks for class sizes, and incentives for universities that demonstrate strong student outcomes alongside enrolment growth. Casual staff conversion to more secure positions is another frequently mentioned strategy to improve consistency and reduce turnover.
Looking Ahead to Sustainable Solutions
The path forward will require coordinated action from universities, unions, government, and students themselves. Renewed emphasis on the student experience as a core performance measure could encourage better resource allocation. International comparisons show that many high-performing systems maintain relatively small tutorial sizes through different funding priorities and staffing models.
Longer term, demographic shifts, technological advances in education delivery, and evolving employer expectations will continue to shape the sector. The current moment offers an opportunity to recalibrate so that growth does not come at the expense of the personalised, high-quality education that has defined Australian universities for generations.
Guidance for Current and Prospective Students
Students entering or already in the system can take steps to maximise their experience. Engaging early with tutors, forming study groups, and using available support services help offset larger class sizes. When choosing subjects or institutions, asking about typical tutorial numbers and support structures provides useful context.
Prospective students may also benefit from reviewing graduate outcomes data and speaking with current students about their day-to-day reality. Understanding the full picture allows for informed decisions about where and how to pursue higher education goals.
Photo by Jeremy Huang on Unsplash
Support and Resources for University Staff
Academic and professional staff navigating these pressures have access to union support, professional development opportunities, and institutional wellbeing programs. Sharing experiences through networks can reduce isolation and surface practical coping strategies. Advocacy for sustainable workloads remains an important channel for collective improvement.
Institutions that prioritise staff wellbeing alongside student numbers tend to see better retention and stronger teaching quality over time. The connection between supported educators and successful learners is well established in educational research and practice.
.jpg){kind=logo}
.jpg){kind=logo}
.jpg){kind=logo}
