A recent comprehensive analysis of Australian science news coverage has revealed a nuanced picture of gender dynamics in the field. While the number of female and male journalists producing STEM stories has reached near parity, the voices of male experts continue to dominate as quoted sources across print and online outlets.
This development comes amid broader efforts in Australian higher education to promote equity in STEM disciplines and science communication training programs at universities nationwide.
Key Findings from the Five-Year Study
The study, covering 2018 to 2022, examined hundreds of science news articles from major Australian media organisations. Researchers found that women authored an increasing share of stories over the period, with fluctuations by outlet but an overall balance in journalist gender.
However, when it came to direct quotes from scientists and experts, men appeared in 76 percent of articles. Women featured as direct sources in 45 percent of pieces, showing improvement over previous analyses but still indicating significant underrepresentation.
Even in fields where women comprise the majority of researchers, such as certain life sciences, male experts were quoted more frequently.
Context Within Australian Higher Education
Australian universities play a central role in preparing the next generation of science journalists and researchers. Programs at institutions like the Australian National University and others emphasise media training alongside scientific expertise.
The persistence of source disparities highlights opportunities for universities to strengthen modules on inclusive sourcing practices and gender awareness in science communication curricula.
Many Australian higher education providers have integrated equity, diversity and inclusion principles into their STEM faculties, yet translating these into media visibility remains an ongoing challenge.
Implications for Science Communication Training
Journalism and science communication degrees across Australia increasingly incorporate training on diverse expert selection. Educators note that students learn to actively seek out female and underrepresented voices to provide balanced reporting.
Universities report that graduates entering newsrooms bring fresh perspectives, contributing to the observed parity among journalists themselves.
Despite this progress, systemic factors in news production, including tight deadlines and established networks, can influence sourcing decisions.
Photo by Jeremy Huang on Unsplash
Stakeholder Perspectives from Academia and Media
Researchers involved in the analysis emphasised that near parity among journalists represents meaningful advancement compared to earlier decades. They pointed to gradual cultural shifts within news organisations.
University leaders in STEM fields stress the importance of supporting female researchers in developing media skills and confidence to engage with journalists.
Science communicators at Australian institutions highlight successful initiatives, such as media training workshops and expert databases that promote gender balance.
Challenges in Achieving Full Equity
Disparities in source selection persist due to factors including historical networks, perceptions of authority, and the concentration of senior positions in certain disciplines.
Women in Australian academia often face additional demands on their time, potentially limiting availability for media engagements compared to male counterparts.
Regional differences also emerge, with some outlets showing more progress than others in diverse sourcing.
University-Led Solutions and Initiatives
Several Australian universities have launched programs to increase the visibility of female scientists. These include dedicated media liaison services and mentorship schemes pairing early-career researchers with experienced communicators.
Collaborations between higher education institutions and media outlets aim to build pipelines of diverse experts ready for comment on breaking science stories.
Professional development opportunities focused on interview skills and public engagement are becoming standard in many STEM postgraduate offerings.
Broader Impacts on Public Understanding of Science
Balanced representation in science news influences public perceptions of who conducts research and shapes policy. Underrepresentation of women as experts may reinforce outdated stereotypes about STEM careers.
Higher education institutions recognise their responsibility in fostering an inclusive narrative that reflects the actual diversity of Australia's scientific workforce.
Improved sourcing practices can enhance trust in science reporting among diverse audiences.
Future Outlook and Recommendations
Continued monitoring of gender patterns in science news will be essential as media landscapes evolve with digital platforms. Universities are well positioned to lead research and training in this area.
Recommendations emerging from the sector include expanding expert directories with gender and diversity filters, and encouraging newsrooms to track sourcing metrics internally.
Long-term cultural change in both academia and journalism promises further gains toward equity.
Actionable Insights for Higher Education Professionals
Faculty members can integrate discussions of media representation into existing courses on research ethics and communication.
Administrators might consider partnerships with journalism schools to co-develop resources on inclusive sourcing.
Individual researchers benefit from participating in university-supported media training to build personal networks with journalists.
