Announcement Signals End of an Era for Tertiary Support

The New Zealand coalition government has confirmed it will scrap the Final Year Fees-Free Scheme in the upcoming Budget 2026, marking the end of a policy that promised to ease the financial burden on students completing their first tertiary qualification. Finance Minister Nicola Willis stated that ongoing negotiations led to decisions prioritizing long-term interests, with 2026 set as the final year of eligibility. This move follows a leaked comment from New Zealand First leader Winston Peters and comes amid fiscal pressures including persistent deficits and rising debt since 2019.

Originally launched in 2018 under the previous Labour government as a first-year free tuition initiative covering up to $12,000 in fees, the scheme evolved. By 2024, it shifted to target the final year of study for eligible learners—those without prior tertiary experience pursuing qualifications at New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF) Levels 3 and above, including university degrees, diplomas, and work-based programs. The change aimed to incentivize completion rates, but stark data reveals its limited reach.

History and Evolution of the Fees-Free Initiative

The Fees-Free policy emerged as a flagship Labour commitment to boost tertiary participation, particularly among underrepresented groups. In its initial form, it provided upfront fee relief for first-time enrollees, peaking at around 42,740 new learners in 2024—a 13% drop from 2023 but still substantial. Proponents argued it reduced entry barriers in a system where domestic students could already access interest-free loans via the Student Loan Scheme if staying in New Zealand.

The pivot to final-year support was intended to address completion gaps, with payments disbursed only upon successful graduation. This adjustment responded to critiques that first-year relief often benefited dropouts, as attrition is highest early on. However, the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) analysis highlighted administrative complexities, including new data-sharing requirements with Inland Revenue Department (IRD) for verification.

Universities like the University of Auckland, University of Otago, and Victoria University of Wellington adapted by promoting the scheme to final-year cohorts, but overall engagement lagged. The policy's broad eligibility—encompassing provider-based learning at polytechnics such as Ara Institute of Canterbury and work-based apprenticeships—diluted its focus on university-level bachelor's completions.

Staggeringly Low Uptake: Just 1500 Beneficiaries

Despite high expectations, only around 1500 students have accessed the final-year Fees-Free benefit since its rollout. This figure pales against projections and the first-year scheme's scale, underscoring a participation shortfall. TEC monitoring shows that while first-year uptake hovered in the tens of thousands annually, the completion-based model filtered out many due to dropout rates—Māori and Pacific learners complete degrees at 50% and 48% respectively, compared to 62% overall.

At institutions like Massey University and the University of Canterbury, final-year claims have been minimal, with anecdotal reports from student services highlighting confusion over eligibility and application processes. The requirement to pay fees upfront and seek reimbursement post-graduation deterred cash-strapped students, exacerbating reliance on loans.

Barriers Explaining the Disappointing Participation

Several interconnected factors contributed to the scheme's tepid response. Foremost, tuition fees were not the primary obstacle for many aspiring tertiary learners. Research tracking over 250,000 school leavers from 2015-2019 cohorts reveals that pre-enrolment hurdles—such as school achievement disparities, living expenses, family obligations, and lack of information—dominate. Lower-decile school students, already less likely to pursue bachelor's degrees, saw no relative improvement.

The final-year timing arrived too late for most attrition, which peaks in years one and two. Strong labor markets during implementation further siphoned potential enrollees into employment. Administrative hurdles, including IRD verification and post-completion claims, added friction. Equity gaps persisted: higher-decile students, with better prior preparation, disproportionately benefited, mirroring first-year trends where the policy cost $350 million annually but swayed perhaps only 400 additional enrollees per cohort.

Photo by Lala Azizli on Unsplash

• High living costs in university cities like Auckland and Wellington outstripped fee relief.
• Confusion over eligibility for multi-year degrees or apprenticeships.
• Upfront payment requirement clashed with immediate financial pressures.
• Limited awareness campaigns failed to reach first-in-family or regional learners.

Government's Rationale: Poor Value Amid Fiscal Realities

Tertiary Education Minister Penny Simmonds and Finance Minister Willis cited evidence of failure to meet objectives: no enrolment surge, negligible equity gains, and suboptimal targeting. The scheme 'didn't achieve its goal' of widening access, with poor uptake among disadvantaged groups. TEC's supplementary analysis projected minimal behavioral shifts, projecting $879 million savings from scrapping versus the first-year model, offset partially by increased lending.

Fiscal discipline drives the decision, redirecting funds to vocational training and skills shortages via the Skills Highway initiative. Officials note net costs persist due to higher loans ($50 million annual write-down), arguing for targeted interventions over universal subsidies. For New Zealand's eight universities, this shifts reliance to core funding and domestic fees, potentially stabilizing budgets strained by international enrolment fluctuations.

Student Outrage and Calls for Reversal

Reactions from students at Lincoln University, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), and beyond have been swift and critical. 'Sneaky and unfair,' one University of Waikato student told media, highlighting blindsiding amid 6% fee hikes and soaring rents. Student unions like Aotearoa Student Press Association decry a 'kick to the gut,' predicting exodus to Australia where youth unemployment bites and debt aversion grows.

Nate Wilbourne of the New Zealand Union of Students' Associations (NZUSA) emphasized investment in future professionals, noting 14.4% youth NEET rates in Q1 2026. Labour's Chris Hipkins called it 'very disruptive,' urging reinstatement. Protests at campuses signal broader affordability concerns, with calls for living cost supports over fee tweaks.

University Perspectives: Mixed Impacts on Institutions

NZ vice-chancellors express cautious acceptance, acknowledging data on inefficacy while lamenting lost revenue. Universities New Zealand chair warned of enrolment dips but highlighted resilience via research grants and international fees. Polytechnics like Unitec and WelTec, serving diverse cohorts, see completion incentives as theoretically sound but practically undermined by non-fee barriers.

At the University of Otago's medical school and Victoria's law programs, final-year relief aided retention marginally, but overall, institutions pivot to scholarships and employer partnerships. TEC's monitoring underscores no completion uplift, prompting focus on wraparound services like mental health and career advising.

Equity and Access Ramifications for Marginalized Groups

The policy's demise spotlights entrenched disparities. Māori completion lags necessitate earlier interventions like targeted school bridging. Pacific students at AUT's Pasifika programs faced similar hurdles. A Conversation study confirms fees-free as 'blunt tool,' costing $800,000 per swayed enrollee without closing decile gaps.

Women, comprising 51% of graduates, benefited proportionally, but rural learners at Lincoln University struggle with relocation costs. Te Tiriti o Waitangi critiques note poor Māori engagement, failing equity mandates. Future access hinges on upstream fixes: bolstering NCEA achievement and family supports.

Photo by algoleague on Unsplash

Alternatives and Pathways Forward

Experts advocate precision-targeted aid: income-contingent vouchers for low-SES final-year students, expanded apprenticeships, and micro-credentials. TEC's Vocational Education reforms emphasize work-integrated learning at institutes like Otago Polytechnic. Universities propose performance-based funding tied to equity metrics.

• Enhance StudyLink allowances for living costs.
• Free bridging courses for underprepared school leavers.
• Employer co-funding for high-demand fields like nursing at Massey.
• Digital platforms for eligibility checks.

Government hints at reallocating to targeted scholarships, potentially via TEC's Skills Highway.

Future Outlook for NZ Higher Education

Scrapping Fees-Free accelerates a rethink of tertiary funding amid 2026's enrolment boom reversal. Universities brace for domestic dips, leaning on Asia-Pacific internationals. Completion incentives may evolve into loan forgiveness for shortage areas like engineering at Canterbury. Students face recalibrated debts—average $25,000 post-bachelor's—but opportunities abound in reskilling.

For aspiring lecturers or researchers eyeing roles at NZ unis, this underscores policy flux; yet robust job markets persist. The episode highlights fees as one cog in access machinery, urging holistic reforms for sustainable participation.