The Emergence of the Anti-Indoctrination Memo at University of Houston

In early 2026, faculty members at the University of Houston (UH), a major public research university in Texas, received an unexpected request from their deans. Dubbed the anti-indoctrination pledge by critics, the memo asked professors to affirm their commitment to fostering critical thinking over imposing personal views on students. This development, rooted in broader state legislative changes, has sparked debates on academic freedom, institutional compliance, and the role of higher education in a politically charged environment.

The memo originated from a directive issued by UH Chancellor and President Renu Khator in a November 21, 2025, email to deans. Khator emphasized that the university's pedagogical mission centers on equipping students to form their own opinions rather than having opinions forced upon them. She wrote, "Our responsibility is to give [students] the ability to form their own opinions, not to force a particular one on them. Our guiding principle is to teach them, not to indoctrinate them." This language set the stage for deans to collect formal affirmations from faculty across colleges.

Dean Daniel O'Connor of the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences (CLASS) was among the first to distribute the three-page document, emailing it to over 600 instructors in late January or early February 2026. Other deans followed suit university-wide, with a deadline of February 10 for responses. Importantly, O'Connor clarified that no punitive measures would apply for non-signers, though their syllabi might undergo review to ensure alignment with critical thinking standards.

Decoding the Content of the Faculty Pledge

The memo, titled "A Primary Objective of Higher Education is to Enhance Critical Thinking," draws on established frameworks like the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) VALUE rubrics, which UH and many institutions have adopted. It begins with Khator's email excerpt and provides a detailed definition of critical thinking: the habit of mind characterized by explanation of issues, evidence presentation, consideration of context and assumptions, clear positioning, and logical conclusions.

Faculty are asked to acknowledge five key statements:

• A primary purpose of higher education is to enhance critical thinking.
• Our responsibility is to give students the ability to form their own opinions, not to indoctrinate them.
• I understand the definition and attributes of critical thinking.
• I design my courses and course materials to be consistent with the definition and attributes of critical thinking.
• I use methods of instruction that are intended to enhance students’ critical thinking.

These affirmations aim to document faculty awareness and course alignment without alleging violations. O'Connor described it as a straightforward way to reassure the UH System Board of Regents of compliance with pedagogical standards.

Texas Senate Bill 37: The Legislative Catalyst

Texas Senate Bill 37 (SB 37), passed by the 89th Legislature in 2025 and effective January 1, 2026, represents a sweeping overhaul of public higher education governance. Sponsored by Sen. Brandon Creighton, the bill shifts power from faculty senates to governing boards, mandates regular reviews of core undergraduate curricula, and establishes an ombudsman to handle complaints about ideological bias or non-essential content.

Core courses must now be deemed "foundational, fundamental, and necessary for civic and professional life," providing a "breadth of knowledge" across disciplines. While SB 37 does not explicitly mention "indoctrination," proponents argued it counters perceived liberal biases in curricula, echoing national debates. Critics, including the Texas AFT and AAUP, decried it as government intrusion stifling academic freedom and research.

UH's memo, though not directly citing SB 37, aligns with its curriculum review mandates. Khator's initiative preempts potential board scrutiny, part of Texas' conservative reforms like SB 17 banning DEI offices, which led to program cuts and faculty concerns statewide.

For deeper reading on Texas higher ed laws, visit the official SB 37 text.

Faculty Reactions and Resistance Strategies

Responses from UH faculty ranged from compliance to outright refusal, highlighting tensions over academic autonomy. Associate English Professor María C. González, a 35-year veteran and faculty council member, declined to sign, emailing deans: "I respectfully decline to click the link... I do want to acknowledge that I have reviewed my courses and can confirm that the work I do in my teaching is about teaching critical thinking." Her English department colleagues sent similar personalized affirmations.

The UH chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) circulated a "conscientious objector" template, rejecting the memo's premise as a "straw man." It asserts: "The premise of this assertion is a straw man, and I am concerned that my signing of this letter could serve as some admission of guilt concerning these false accusations." The template invokes academic freedom rights and questions deans' authority under UH bylaws.

English Department Chair Lauren Zentz voiced broader fears: "It’s still such a dangerous climate that any moment of overcompliance kind of puts us at risk for sliding down the slippery slope." No aggregate signing data is public, but pushback was notable in humanities.

Broader Context in Texas Higher Education Landscape

UH's pledge fits into Texas' aggressive higher ed reforms under Republican leadership. Recent actions include dismantling DEI programs (SB 17), firing professors for controversial remarks (e.g., Texas A&M cases), and launching public complaint portals for ideological bias reports. Texas Tech and other systems have ramped up curriculum audits.

Proponents cite surveys like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) showing faculty lean left (12:1 in humanities), fueling indoctrination claims. Critics counter with data from the AAUP indicating no widespread bias, emphasizing diverse viewpoints in classrooms.

Texas ranks high in national higher ed enrollment (1.4 million students), but reforms risk faculty exodus. A 2025 Texas AFT report warned SB 37 could exacerbate shortages in teaching and research roles.

Implications for Academic Freedom and Classroom Dynamics

The pledge raises First Amendment concerns, as vague "indoctrination" terms could chill discussions on sensitive topics like history or social sciences. Faculty worry syllabi reviews invite micromanagement, potentially self-censoring to avoid scrutiny.

Benefits cited by administrators include reinforcing best practices, aligning with AAC&U standards used nationwide. Students gain from explicit critical thinking focus, vital for employability—critical thinkers earn 17% more per Burning Glass data.

• Risks: Erosion of tenure protections, faculty morale dip.
• Opportunities: Renewed emphasis on evidence-based teaching.

For faculty navigating this, resources like higher ed career advice offer strategies on syllabus design amid regulations.

Comparisons to Other Institutions and States

Florida's Stop WOKE Act and anti-DEI laws mirror Texas, with University of Florida cutting $900K in grants over compliance. Iowa and Utah have similar curriculum mandates. UH's approach is softer—no penalties—unlike firings elsewhere.

Private universities like Harvard face donor pressures post-antisemitism hearings, but public Texas institutions bear direct legislative weight. Nationally, 25 states proposed anti-indoctrination bills in 2025.

Stakeholder Perspectives: Students, Administrators, and Legislators

Students largely unaware, but some welcome bias checks per campus polls. Administrators like Khator position it defensively, protecting funding ($6.2B state allocation). Legislators tout it as restoring "core mission," per Sen. Creighton.

Explore professor ratings via Rate My Professor to gauge teaching styles amid these shifts.

Photo by Terren Hurst on Unsplash

Future Outlook and Actionable Insights for Higher Ed Professionals

As SB 37 implementation unfolds, expect more audits and Faculty Councils per bylaws. UH may refine processes post-February. Nationally, Supreme Court challenges loom on academic speech.

For job seekers: Highlight critical thinking in applications for faculty jobs. Current faculty: Document teaching methods proactively. Institutions: Adopt transparent rubrics early.

Texas higher ed remains vibrant—UH enrolls 47,000 students—but balance innovation with compliance. Stay informed via university jobs updates and career advice.

In summary, the UH pledge underscores evolving governance, urging all stakeholders toward evidence-driven education.