China's scholarly publishing landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, with domestic platforms and journals accelerating in scale, quality, and strategic importance. This shift reflects broader national priorities in science and technology self-reliance, as articulated through coordinated efforts by key government bodies including the China Association for Science and Technology (CAST), the Ministry of Education, and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST).
Research Output Surge and Strategic Context
Chinese researchers now contribute a substantial share of global scientific output. Data from the Nature Index 2026 Research Leaders show China maintaining its position at the top, with institutions like the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) leading globally in share and count across multiple disciplines. Universities such as Zhejiang University, Tsinghua University, and the University of Science and Technology of China consistently rank among the world's elite for high-quality research contributions. This growth builds on years of investment in higher education and research infrastructure, positioning Chinese universities as central players in the evolving ecosystem.
The Excellence Action Plan for STM Journals
At the heart of the acceleration is CAST's Excellence Action Plan for Science, Technology, and Medicine (STM) Journals. Phase II, spanning 2024 to 2028, has moved beyond incremental upgrades to actively fund new titles. In late 2024, CAST supported 50 new “High-Starting-Point” journal projects. This was followed by an additional 70 selections in 2025, bringing the total to 120 new journals. Many of these are English-language publications designed to attract international authors and citations, with many expected to launch in 2026. The plan emphasizes integrated ecosystem development rather than isolated journal improvements.
Government Policy Drivers and Evaluation Reforms
Policy reforms from the Ministry of Education and MOST have played a pivotal role. Earlier guidelines discouraged over-reliance on SCI metrics for evaluations, promotions, and funding allocations in higher education institutions. These changes encourage publication in a curated list of high-quality domestic STM journals while still supporting top international outlets for groundbreaking work. The reforms aim to foster a balanced approach, reducing the “papers only” orientation and promoting research integrity and quality over quantity.
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
CAS Funding Realignment and Cost Controls
A notable development involves CAS, the world's largest research institution with over 100 institutes and tens of thousands of researchers. Effective in 2026, CAS has curtailed coverage of article processing charges (APCs) for certain high-cost international open-access journals, including titles like Nature Communications and Cell Reports. This redirection of resources supports the growth of domestic publishing capacity and aligns with national goals for cost efficiency and ecosystem strengthening. Researchers retain options to publish elsewhere using alternative funding sources.
Emerging Domestic Metrics and Platforms
New evaluation frameworks are emerging alongside traditional systems. The Dongbi Index, launched in 2026 by Dongbi Data, ranks over 12,710 journals across disciplines using citation quality and network analysis rather than raw volume. It assigns tiered categories (A through D) and challenges the dominance of established impact factors. Complementary efforts, such as the Xinrui Journal Ranking, provide additional tools for assessing journal performance within China. Platforms like China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) continue to serve as foundational infrastructure for accessing and disseminating domestic research.
Impact on Universities and Academic Careers
These developments directly affect higher education institutions across China. Universities are adapting hiring, promotion, and tenure criteria to value contributions to domestic journals and collaborative platforms. PhD-track researchers and early-career academics now navigate a landscape where publishing in homegrown outlets can enhance visibility and career progression within the national system. Institutions like Peking University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University are integrating these priorities into their research strategies, fostering greater alignment between academic output and national innovation goals.
Challenges in Quality, Diversity, and Global Reach
Despite rapid progress, hurdles remain. Many domestic journals still receive limited submissions from leading international researchers, with citations often concentrated domestically. Editorial boards and reviewer pools exhibit limited global diversity. Efforts under the Excellence Action Plan address these issues through targeted funding for high-starting-point titles and capacity building. University administrators and faculty are increasingly focused on enhancing international collaboration while strengthening domestic infrastructure.
Photo by Zalfa Imani on Unsplash
Global Implications and Interconnections
China's evolving ecosystem influences worldwide scholarly communication. By reducing dependence on high-APC international publishers and building competitive domestic alternatives, the country is reshaping incentives for authors and institutions globally. International publishers are monitoring these shifts closely, as evidenced by discussions at events like the Society for Scholarly Publishing gatherings. The changes also intersect with broader open-access trends, including models prevalent in Chinese journals that combine modest author fees with immediate free reader access.
Future Outlook for Stakeholders
Looking ahead, the acceleration is expected to continue through 2028 and beyond. Additional journal launches, refined metrics, and deeper integration of AI tools in editorial workflows are anticipated. For university leaders, opportunities exist to leverage these platforms for enhanced research visibility and talent attraction. Job seekers in higher education and research roles will benefit from understanding the shifting evaluation landscape, where domestic publishing contributions gain increasing weight alongside international impact. The overall trajectory points toward a more self-sufficient, influential Chinese scholarly publishing system that complements and competes on the global stage.