Understanding the Rise of Questionable Publishing Practices

In the competitive landscape of academic publishing, researchers in the United States face increasing pressure to publish frequently for career advancement, tenure, and funding opportunities. This environment has unfortunately given rise to questionable practices, including the proliferation of journals that prioritize volume over rigorous peer review. A new free tool called Journal Trends is helping to address these challenges by providing data-driven insights into publication patterns.

Developed by data scientist and research-integrity advocate Achal Agrawal, Journal Trends analyzes metadata from OpenAlex, an open-source scholarly index, to reveal trends in journal output. Users input a journal's ISSN to access visualizations showing publication volumes by year, country, institution, and author. The tool also overlays data from the Problematic Paper Screener (PPS), which flags papers with potential indicators of misconduct such as tortured phrases or citation anomalies.

How Journal Trends Works in Practice

The platform operates entirely in the browser without requiring sign-up, making it accessible to researchers across the United States and beyond. By examining sudden spikes in publications—particularly those concentrated from specific countries or institutions—it highlights potential red flags. For example, a journal might show a dramatic increase in output from one region, suggesting possible exploitation of article processing charges without adequate quality controls.

Integrating PPS flags allows users to see not just volume trends but also the proportion of potentially problematic papers over time. This combination provides a more comprehensive view than traditional indexing services alone. Researchers at U.S. institutions can use these insights when deciding where to submit manuscripts, helping protect their work and reputations.

Implications for U.S. Higher Education Institutions

Universities and colleges across the United States are increasingly focused on research integrity amid growing scrutiny from funders, accreditors, and the public. Tools like Journal Trends support faculty and graduate students in making informed publishing choices, which can influence institutional rankings, grant success, and overall scholarly output quality.

Administrators may consider incorporating such resources into research training programs or library guides. This aligns with broader efforts by bodies like the National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation to promote responsible conduct of research. By flagging suspicious patterns early, the tool helps mitigate risks associated with publishing in low-quality outlets that could later face delisting from major databases like Scopus.

Photo by Philip Strong on Unsplash

Case Examples of Flagged Journals

One documented case involves the International Journal of Advances in Signal and Image Sciences. Data from the tool revealed a sharp rise in publications from 19 papers in 2024 to 153 in 2025, with a significant portion from Indian authors. The journal was subsequently delisted from Scopus, yet it continued to promote its prior indexing status while charging substantial fees.

Such examples underscore the value of proactive analysis. U.S.-based researchers can avoid similar pitfalls by reviewing trends before submission, ensuring their contributions appear in venues that maintain high standards of peer review and editorial oversight.

Expert Perspectives on Research Integrity

Experts in the field emphasize that while publication surges alone do not confirm misconduct, they warrant further investigation. René Aquarius, a neurosurgery researcher at Radboud University Medical Center, notes the tool's utility for integrity sleuths examining systemic issues within journals.

In the U.S. context, where academic careers hinge on publication records, such resources empower individuals and institutions to uphold standards. Partnerships between universities, organizations like the Committee on Publication Ethics, and open data initiatives strengthen the ecosystem.

Broader Context of Predatory and Questionable Journals

The issue of questionable journals extends beyond individual choices to systemic challenges in global scholarly communication. With thousands of new journals emerging annually, distinguishing legitimate outlets from those prioritizing profit remains difficult. Journal Trends addresses this by democratizing access to bibliometric data previously available mainly through paid services.

For U.S. higher education, this supports goals of equity in research access and evaluation. Early-career researchers, postdocs, and faculty at diverse institutions benefit from free tools that level the playing field.

Photo by Artem Beliaikin on Unsplash

Future Outlook and Recommendations

As artificial intelligence and data analytics advance, tools like Journal Trends are likely to evolve with enhanced features, such as predictive modeling for journal quality. U.S. universities might integrate similar functionalities into their research management systems.

Recommendations for researchers include regularly consulting the tool alongside established resources like Think. Check. Submit. and Retraction Watch. Institutions should foster cultures where quality trumps quantity in evaluation processes.

Actionable Steps for Researchers and Administrators

To leverage Journal Trends effectively:

• Input journal ISSNs during the submission planning phase.
• Review country and institutional concentration alongside PPS flag rates.
• Share visualizations with colleagues or mentors for collaborative decision-making.
• Combine insights with qualitative checks, such as editorial board composition and peer review policies.

These steps promote informed choices that safeguard academic careers and contribute to a healthier publishing landscape.