Background on the Centre for Family Violence and Sexual Violence Prevention
The Centre for Family Violence and Sexual Violence Prevention serves as the key government body coordinating efforts to eliminate family violence and sexual violence across Aotearoa New Zealand. Previously known as Te Puna Aonui and the Joint Venture Business Unit, the Centre brings together multiple government agencies to align strategy, policy, and investment. It leads the implementation of Te Aorerekura, the 25-year National Strategy and Action Plan to Eliminate Family Violence and Sexual Violence, which was launched in 2021 with a second action plan covering 2025 to 2030.
Te Aorerekura focuses on six key shifts for change, including moving towards strength-based wellbeing approaches, strengthening multi-agency responses, supporting behaviour change for those who use violence, protecting children and young people, building workforce capability, and taking specific action on sexual violence. The Centre works with tangata whenua, specialist sectors, and communities to drive collective action across votes including Justice, Social Development, Health, and Oranga Tamariki.
Details of the Proposed Job Cuts
The board of the Centre has proposed a restructure that would cut 36 roles, six of which are currently vacant. In parallel, the plan includes establishing 10 new roles, resulting in a net reduction of approximately 26 positions. This change is expected to affect around a third of the Centre's workforce. The proposal comes amid broader government efforts to manage public sector spending and improve operational efficiency.
Officials have indicated that the restructure aims to streamline operations while maintaining core functions in strategy, policy, and coordination. The new roles are intended to focus on priority areas such as data insights, commissioning, and targeted prevention initiatives. Staff and stakeholders have been notified, with consultation processes underway as required under employment law.
Context of Government Fiscal Pressures
New Zealand's public sector has faced ongoing reviews of staffing levels and budgets in recent years. The proposed changes at the Centre align with wider patterns of role reductions across government organisations as ministers seek to balance fiscal responsibility with service delivery. These pressures reflect economic conditions including inflation, debt management, and post-pandemic recovery priorities.
While specific budget figures for the Centre have not been publicly detailed in the current proposal, the restructure is part of efforts to ensure resources are directed efficiently toward frontline prevention and response activities rather than administrative overhead.
Scale of Family Violence and Sexual Violence in New Zealand
Family violence and sexual violence remain significant challenges in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Police conduct more than 100,000 investigations related to family violence each year. Nearly half of all homicides and reported violent crimes are family violence related. Prevalence data shows that one in four females and one in eight males experience intimate partner violence in their lifetime, with higher rates among certain population groups including Māori and Pacific peoples.
Surveys such as the New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey highlight that 55% of women have experienced one or more types of abuse from intimate partners. These figures underscore the critical role of coordinated national efforts like those led by the Centre in prevention, early intervention, and support for victims and survivors.
Photo by Nik Schmidt on Unsplash
Stakeholder Reactions and Concerns
Opposition parties and advocacy groups have expressed strong concerns about the proposed cuts. The Green Party has called on the Government to scrap the plans, arguing that reducing capacity at the Centre could undermine progress on Te Aorerekura and increase risks for victims. Sector organisations have highlighted potential impacts on coordination between agencies, workforce development, and community engagement.
Union representatives and staff have raised issues around job security, workload redistribution, and the loss of institutional knowledge. Some have questioned whether the net reduction in roles will allow the Centre to meet its ambitious targets under the national strategy. Public statements emphasise the need for adequate resourcing to address the scale of the problem.
Potential Impacts on Prevention Efforts
A reduction in staffing could affect several core functions of the Centre, including cross-agency collaboration, data collection and insights, policy development, and support for the specialist family violence and sexual violence sectors. Stakeholders worry about slower progress on key priorities such as building workforce capability across frontline services and strengthening multi-agency responses to keep people safe.
Community organisations that rely on the Centre for guidance, funding alignment, and strategic direction may face challenges in maintaining momentum. There are also concerns about the ability to respond effectively to emerging issues, such as specific actions on sexual violence and prevention programmes targeting children and young people.
Broader Implications for Victims and Communities
Effective coordination at the national level supports local services that directly assist victims and survivors. Any disruption to the Centre's capacity could indirectly affect response times, information sharing between agencies, and the development of evidence-based interventions. Māori communities, who experience disproportionately high rates of family violence, have particular interest in ensuring culturally appropriate approaches continue to be prioritised.
Advocates stress that sustained investment in prevention is essential to reduce long-term societal costs, including those related to health, justice, and social services. The proposed changes have prompted discussions about alternative ways to achieve efficiencies without compromising outcomes for those affected by violence.
Government Position and Rationale
Government ministers have framed the restructure as a necessary step to modernise operations and focus resources on high-impact activities. The emphasis is on creating a leaner organisation that can deliver results more effectively through targeted new roles in areas such as insights and commissioning. Officials maintain that core commitments under Te Aorerekura will be upheld.
The proposal is subject to standard consultation processes, and final decisions will take into account feedback from staff and stakeholders. This approach reflects standard public sector practice when organisational changes are considered.
Photo by Tim Marshall on Unsplash
Future Outlook and Possible Pathways
The coming weeks and months will be critical as consultation concludes and any final restructure decisions are implemented. Observers are watching for how the Centre adapts its operating model and whether additional support or transitional funding is provided to minimise disruption.
Longer term, the success of Te Aorerekura depends on continued cross-government commitment and adequate resourcing. Discussions are likely to continue about innovative funding models, greater involvement of non-government organisations, and leveraging technology to enhance efficiency in prevention work.
Lessons from Similar Restructures
Previous public sector changes in New Zealand have shown mixed results, with some achieving cost savings but others facing criticism over service impacts. Lessons from those experiences highlight the importance of clear communication, support for affected staff, and robust monitoring of outcomes during transition periods.
For the family violence sector, maintaining momentum on prevention requires careful attention to how changes at the Centre interact with wider agency budgets and community programmes. Stakeholders are calling for transparent reporting on how the restructure affects key performance indicators under the national strategy.
