On June 17, 2026, Pauline Hanson, the leader of the One Nation party, delivered her first address to the National Press Club of Australia in Canberra. The speech, lasting more than 50 minutes, focused heavily on immigration and cultural policy, with Hanson arguing that multiculturalism has failed and that Australia should instead pursue a monocultural approach while remaining multiracial.
Background to the Address
Pauline Hanson first entered federal parliament in 1996 as the independent member for Oxley in Queensland. Her maiden speech at the time sparked widespread debate over issues of race, immigration and national identity. Since then she has led One Nation, a party that has experienced fluctuating electoral success but has maintained a consistent focus on reducing immigration levels and questioning aspects of Australia's multicultural framework. The National Press Club appearance marked a significant platform for Hanson, coming at a time when polls indicated rising support for One Nation amid public concerns over housing affordability, cost of living pressures and border security.
The event itself drew considerable attention from media and political observers. Hanson began by declining a Welcome to Country, describing such ceremonies as divisive. She positioned her remarks as a direct challenge to what she described as the established consensus on cultural diversity in Australia.
Key Elements of the Speech
Hanson opened her prepared remarks by stating that immigration policy had placed the country in crisis. She singled out multiculturalism as the central flaw in that policy. “We cannot be a multicultural society,” she said. “We are a multiracial society, but we must be monocultural. Australians must live under the one cultural umbrella.”
She elaborated that English should be the primary language spoken at home and criticised policies that she argued grant equivalence to all cultures rather than prioritising Australia's foundational values. Hanson expressed particular concern about radical Islam and proposed restricting immigration from countries that she said foster such ideologies. When asked during the question-and-answer session whether Australia risked being “swamped by Muslims,” she replied that this would not happen if she had any say in the matter.
Additional policy proposals included abolishing the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS) and converting the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) to a subscription model. Hanson also criticised what she called the climate change “hoax” and transgender ideology, framing the latter as an insurgency. Throughout the address she emphasised the need for stronger border controls and reduced overall migration numbers to ease pressure on housing and public services.
Protest and Disruption
The speech was interrupted when activists from the lobby group GetUp unfurled a protest banner inside the venue. The banner highlighted Hanson's opposition to wage increases for low-paid workers. The National Press Club subsequently referred the incident to the Australian Federal Police. Hanson continued speaking without acknowledging the disruption directly. Outside the venue, smaller protests also took place, reflecting the polarised public response to her views on multiculturalism and immigration.
Political Context and Reactions
The address occurred against a backdrop of shifting voter sentiment. Recent polling has shown One Nation gaining ground, with Hanson at times overtaking Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as preferred leader in some surveys. Supporters praised the speech for articulating long-held concerns about social cohesion and the pace of demographic change. Critics, including representatives from multicultural advocacy groups and opposition parties, condemned the remarks as divisive and out of step with Australia's modern identity.
Media coverage across outlets such as the ABC, The Guardian and Reuters highlighted both the substance of Hanson's arguments and the theatrical elements of the event. Some commentators noted echoes of international populist rhetoric, while others focused on the domestic implications for coalition-building ahead of future elections.
Implications for Australian Society
Hanson's intervention has reignited national conversation about the balance between cultural diversity and shared national values. Australia has long promoted multiculturalism as official policy, with successive governments supporting programs that encourage the maintenance of cultural traditions alongside integration into broader society. Hanson's monocultural vision challenges this approach directly, arguing that true cohesion requires a single dominant cultural framework.
Stakeholders in the immigration sector, community organisations and religious groups have begun responding with statements emphasising the economic and social contributions of migrants. At the same time, segments of the public frustrated with housing shortages and infrastructure strain have voiced support for tighter controls. The speech underscores ongoing tensions between rapid population growth and the capacity of cities and regional areas to accommodate new arrivals.
Future Outlook
As One Nation positions itself for greater influence, Hanson's Press Club performance is likely to shape the party's platform heading into the next federal election cycle. Whether her calls for policy reversal gain legislative traction remains to be seen, but the address has succeeded in placing multiculturalism and immigration at the centre of political discourse once again. Observers will watch closely for responses from major parties and any shifts in public opinion polls in the coming weeks.
The event also raises questions about the role of public broadcasters and the treatment of cultural ceremonies in official settings. These themes are expected to feature in upcoming parliamentary debates and media commentary.
