The Big Ten conference, one of the most prestigious athletic and academic alliances in higher education, is grappling with a stunning wave of leadership changes. Since early 2025, eight out of its 18 presidents or chancellors have departed their positions—a staggering 44% turnover rate that outpaces any other major athletic conference. This revolving door at the top has left observers wondering: what is driving such instability at these flagship institutions, and what does it mean for the future of college athletics, research, and university governance?

These departures span retirements after long tenures, moves to new opportunities, and abrupt resignations amid scandals, budget crises, and political pressures. High-profile cases include Ohio State University's President Ted Carter, who resigned in early March 2026 after admitting to an inappropriate relationship involving public resources for a private business venture. Similarly, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's Chancellor Rodney Bennett exited hastily in January 2026 following faculty backlash over program cuts and a no-confidence vote. Northwestern University's President Michael Schill stepped down in September 2025 amid congressional scrutiny over campus protests, federal funding freezes, and athletics turmoil.

Other exits in 2025 included leaders at institutions like the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, where Chancellor Robert Jones announced his departure, and several others involving planned retirements or lateral moves. This surge disrupts not just individual campuses but the entire conference, which relies on its Council of Presidents and Chancellors for key decisions on media rights, athlete compensation, and expansion strategies.

📈 A Long-Standing Trend Amplified

While the recent eight departures grab headlines, short presidential tenures have plagued Big Ten universities for decades. According to a detailed Flatwater Free Press investigation, presidents have averaged just 5.5 years in office since 2000—shorter than national averages for public research universities. The longest-serving current leader, University of Maryland President Darryll J. Pines, has held the role since July 2020, highlighting the exception rather than the rule.

Big Ten schools are behemoths: massive public research universities with enrollments exceeding 50,000 students, billion-dollar budgets, top-tier athletics programs, and heavy political scrutiny. Leading one requires juggling roles akin to a Fortune 500 CEO, hospital administrator, small-city mayor, and professional sports franchise owner. As Robert Kelchen, a higher education policy expert at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville, notes, "These are some of the most challenging jobs in the country, many in politically contested states, with athletics and donor pressures adding layers of complexity."

🔍 Spotlight on Key Departures

Each exit tells a story reflective of broader pressures:

• Ohio State University (Ted Carter, March 2026): Just two years into his tenure, Carter—a former University of Nebraska president and Naval Academy superintendent—resigned after disclosing an inappropriate relationship. The scandal involved granting undue access to university leadership for a business seeker's project. Ohio State, the nation's sixth-largest university, quickly named Provost Ravi Bellamkonda as interim, underscoring the need for swift stability.
• University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Rodney Bennett, January 2026): Bennett's abrupt departure came after contentious program eliminations to address budget shortfalls, sparking a faculty senate no-confidence vote. Critics decried his disengaged style and $1.1 million exit package, funded privately, amid accusations of misplaced priorities.
• Northwestern University (Michael Schill, September 2025): Schill navigated hazing scandals in football, pro-Palestinian protests drawing Republican ire, and a $790 million federal funding freeze under the Trump administration, leading to 425 layoffs. His exit was framed as timing for fresh leadership.
• University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (Robert Jones, 2025): Jones stepped down after steering the campus through enrollment growth and research expansions, citing a desire for new vision.

These cases exemplify a mix of personal missteps, fiscal strains, and external politics. A ninth leader, University of Wisconsin-Madison Chancellor Jennifer Mnookin, plans to depart at year's end for Columbia University, further thinning experienced ranks.

Photo by Mark Kats on Unsplash

⚖️ Root Causes: Politics, Money, and More

The perfect storm fueling this turnover includes:

• Political Pressures: With Donald Trump's return in 2025, higher education faces renewed scrutiny over free speech, diversity initiatives, and campus protests. Congressional hearings on antisemitism and funding cuts have targeted leaders like Schill, creating untenable positions.
• Financial Challenges: Stagnant state funding, enrollment fluctuations post-pandemic, and soaring athletics costs (NIL deals, facility upgrades) strain budgets. Big Ten schools reported over $3 billion in athletic revenues in 2025, but disparities fuel internal tensions.
• Athletics Overload: Expansion to 18 members (adding USC, UCLA, Oregon, Washington) amplifies media deals worth $7 billion through 2030, but decisions on revenue sharing and private equity investments demand seasoned presidents.
• Internal Conflicts: Faculty senates, donor demands, and board frictions erode support, as seen in no-confidence votes and scandals.

Michael Harris of Southern Methodist University warns, "Successive short tenures derail long-term strategy, relationships with legislators and donors, and momentum on priorities." For Big Ten governance, where presidents—not athletic directors—hold sway, this instability hampers responses to athlete pay models and conference realignments.

🏟️ Impacts on Conference and Campuses

The ripple effects are profound. Interim leaders prioritize stability over bold initiatives, delaying strategic plans. At Ohio State, Carter's exit disrupts talks on Big Ten revenue shares, where powerhouses like OSU seek larger cuts. Nebraska's cuts saved $5.5 million but alienated faculty, potentially harming recruitment.

Conference-wide, the Council of Presidents faces a leadership vacuum during critical negotiations, including stalled private capital deals. Student outcomes suffer too: turnover correlates with administrative churn, affecting advising, funding, and campus climate. For athletics fans, it raises questions about competitive edges, as stable leadership aids recruiting and NIL strategies.

💼 Opportunities in Higher Ed Leadership

Paradoxically, this churn creates openings for ambitious leaders. Big Ten schools seek executives with proven track records in crisis management, fundraising, and stakeholder navigation. Aspiring presidents should hone skills in public policy, athletics governance, and financial stewardship.

Explore higher ed executive jobs or administration positions on AcademicJobs.com, where listings for deans, provosts, and presidents abound. Current searches at Ohio State and Nebraska highlight demand for experienced candidates. For faculty weighing leadership paths, resources like how to write a winning academic CV can position you competitively.

Rate your experiences with campus leaders on Rate My Professor or share insights in the comments below—your voice shapes the conversation.

Photo by David Monje on Unsplash

🔮 Looking Ahead: Stabilizing the Ivory Tower

Reversing the revolving door requires proactive steps: extended contracts with performance incentives, robust board training, and mentorship for new presidents. Conferences like the Big Ten could invest in leadership development programs. As campuses rebound from 2025's turbulence—including federal cuts and enrollment dips—stable teams will thrive.

For more on presidential pressures, see this survey on Trump-era challenges. Discover higher ed jobs, university jobs, or post your opening via recruitment services at AcademicJobs.com. Stay informed, share your say in comments, and position yourself amid the change.

According to a comprehensive Inside Higher Ed analysis, stable leadership is crucial now more than ever for navigating college sports' transformation.