Understanding the CWTS Leiden Ranking Methodology

The CWTS Leiden Ranking, developed by the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University in the Netherlands, is one of the most respected bibliometric assessments of academic institutions worldwide. Unlike reputation-based rankings such as QS or Times Higher Education, the Leiden Ranking focuses exclusively on scientific performance through peer-reviewed publications. It evaluates universities based on the number of publications, their citation impact, and normalized metrics to account for differences in field sizes and publication practices.

Key indicators include the total number of publications with a minimum of one cited reference, the proportion of top 10% most frequently cited publications (PPtop 10%), and the average normalized citation impact (MNCS). For the 2025 edition—covering publications from 2020 to 2023—the ranking emphasizes balanced normalization across 432 fields of science, ensuring fair comparisons between disciplines like medicine, physics, and social sciences. This data-driven approach highlights raw research output and influence, making it a pure measure of scholarly productivity.

Institutions must meet thresholds, such as at least 1,000 publications in the period, to be ranked. The ranking's transparency, with all data sourced from Web of Science and openly available for download, allows researchers to verify results independently. This edition marks a pivotal shift, as Chinese universities have leveraged massive publication volumes and high-impact outputs to climb the leaderboard.

Zhejiang University Claims the Top Spot

Zhejiang University (ZJU) in Hangzhou has dethroned long-time leader Harvard University, securing the number one position in the 2025 CWTS Leiden Ranking. ZJU produced over 40,000 eligible publications between 2020 and 2023, with 12.9% ranking in the global top 10% for citations. This surge reflects ZJU's strategic investments in interdisciplinary research hubs, particularly in artificial intelligence, materials science, and biomedicine.

Founded in 1897, ZJU has evolved into a comprehensive powerhouse with over 60,000 students and partnerships with global tech giants like Alibaba. Its rise is emblematic of China's 'Double First-Class' initiative, which pours billions into elite universities. For instance, ZJU's Life Sciences Institute has published groundbreaking work on CRISPR gene editing, contributing to its high MNCS score of around 1.5—indicating above-average impact.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) follows closely in second place, excelling in engineering and clinical medicine with thousands of high-citation papers. Tsinghua University, Peking University, and the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) also feature prominently, occupying seven of the top ten spots—a dominance unseen in previous years.

Harvard's Descent to Third Place

Harvard University, which held the top spot for over a decade, has slipped to third. Despite maintaining strong outputs—around 35,000 publications—its top 10% cited fraction lags behind Chinese leaders at 11.2%. Factors include federal funding uncertainties amid U.S. budget cuts proposed under recent administrations, which have slowed hiring and infrastructure growth.

Harvard's strengths remain in biomedical research and economics, but normalized impacts have plateaued. Stanford and MIT, other U.S. stalwarts, rank lower at 8th and 12th, respectively. This reflects broader trends: U.S. publication growth has averaged 3% annually since 2020, compared to China's 8-10%.

Experts note that while Harvard excels in per-capita impact, volume metrics favor China's scale. A New York Times analysis links this to policy shifts, including reduced NIH grants affecting early-career researchers.

China's Dominance in the Top 10

• Zhejiang University (#1): Leads in total output and top-cited papers.
• Shanghai Jiao Tong University (#2): Strong in engineering (PPtop 10% = 13.1%).
• Harvard University (#3): Retains high MNCS but lower volume.
• Tsinghua University (#4): AI and quantum computing powerhouse.
• Peking University (#5): Excels in natural sciences.
• University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (#6): Institutes drive massive outputs.
• Southern University of Science and Technology (#7): Rising star in Shenzhen.
• Stanford University (#8): U.S. holdout in top 10.

Nineteen Chinese institutions appear in the top 25, underscoring a systemic ascent fueled by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), which funds over 150,000 projects yearly—dwarfing NSF's U.S. equivalent.

Factors Driving China's Research Surge

China's ascent stems from deliberate policies. The 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) allocated over 1 trillion RMB ($140 billion USD) to R&D, prioritizing 'strategic emerging industries' like biotech and semiconductors. Universities receive performance-based funding, incentivizing publication volume.

International collaborations have boomed: ZJU partners with over 300 global institutions, boosting citation networks. Returnee scholars—over 1 million 'sea turtles' since 2012—bring expertise from Harvard and Oxford. However, critics question quality amid 'publish or perish' pressures, though metrics show rising impacts.

Government incentives include housing subsidies for top researchers and 'Thousand Talents' programs. Enrollment has tripled to 50 million students since 2000, creating a vast talent pool. For academics seeking opportunities, platforms like higher-ed jobs list thousands of positions in China.

U.S. Perspectives and Challenges

American leaders express concern. Harvard President Alan Garber noted in a statement that rankings are 'one metric among many,' emphasizing holistic excellence. Yet, reports highlight visa restrictions and export controls hampering U.S.-China collaborations, reducing joint papers by 15% since 2020.

Federal R&D spending as a GDP share dropped to 0.7% in 2025, per NSF data, versus China's 2.5%. Universities face hiring freezes; adjuncts and postdocs struggle. A Forbes article details how six major rankings show U.S. erosion over two decades.

Solutions proposed include increased NSF budgets and public-private partnerships. Researchers can explore higher-ed career advice for navigating these shifts.

Global Implications for Research Landscape

This shift redefines knowledge production. China now leads in 40% of Scopus-indexed fields, from nanotechnology to renewable energy. Benefits include faster innovation diffusion; ZJU's EV battery research accelerates global green tech.

Risks involve geopolitical tensions: U.S. 'China Initiative' remnants deter collaborations. For students, it means more scholarships at top Chinese unis—check scholarships for options. Europe and Japan lag, with only KU Leuven (Belgium) in top 20 non-China/U.S.

Developing nations gain from open-access Chinese journals, democratizing knowledge.

Comparisons with Other Global Rankings

While QS/THE weigh reputation, Leiden's output focus reveals China's volume edge. Nature Index, quality-oriented, also favors China.

Expert Opinions and Stakeholder Views

Dr. Li Wei, ZJU vice-president, credits 'talent wars' and infrastructure: 'We built 10 new labs since 2020.' U.S. analyst Prof. Jonathan Adams (Clarivate) warns of 'quantity vs. quality' debates but affirms rising impacts.

Chinese netizens celebrate on X (formerly Twitter), posting 'Future belongs to China.' Western posts lament funding gaps. Balanced view: Competition spurs innovation globally.

Opportunities for Global Researchers

This rise opens doors. China's universities hire internationally: ZJU seeks 500 faculty in 2026. Salaries rival U.S. (avg. $100k+ for profs), with perks like hukou residency. Fields booming: AI, quantum.

• Postdocs: High stipends via NSFC.
• Faculty: Tenure tracks at Tsinghua.
• PhDs: Full scholarships.

Visit China university jobs or research jobs on AcademicJobs.com. Career tips at how to write a winning academic CV.

Future Outlook and Predictions

By 2030, projections suggest 10+ Chinese unis in top 20 across metrics, per CWTS forecasts. U.S. rebound possible with policy reversals. Hybrids emerge: Joint labs like Harvard-ZJU.

Challenges: Sustainability amid economic slowdowns. Watch 2026 rankings for trends. Researchers, rate experiences at Rate My Professor.

Conclusion: Navigating the New Research Era

The Leiden Ranking underscores a multipolar research world. Chinese universities' ascent celebrates meritocracy; U.S. must adapt. For careers, explore higher-ed jobs, university jobs, rate my professor, higher-ed career advice. Post a job at recruitment to tap talent.

Photo by tommao wang on Unsplash