Edinburgh Napier University (ENU), a prominent institution in Scotland's higher education landscape, is bracing for significant disruption as members of the Educational Institute of Scotland University and College Lecturers' Association (EIS-ULA) have announced a series of strikes scheduled for April 13-16 and April 21-24, 2026. This action comes amid an escalating dispute over proposed job cuts and the absence of guarantees against compulsory redundancies, highlighting deepening tensions within the Scottish university sector.

The strikes represent the latest chapter in a protracted conflict that began intensifying in late 2025. EIS-ULA, which represents university lecturers across Scotland, argues that the university's cost-cutting measures are unnecessary and detrimental to educational quality. With picket lines planned at all three ENU campuses—Craiglockhart, Merchiston, and Sighthill—these four-day blocks of industrial action could affect thousands of students, particularly those in the final stretch of the academic year.

Roots of the Dispute: Job Cuts and Financial Pressures

The controversy traces back to August 2025, when ENU's principal, Professor Sue Drinkwater, informed staff of plans to eliminate up to 70 positions as part of broader cost-saving initiatives. While some roles were shed through voluntary redundancies, the lingering threat of compulsory layoffs prompted EIS-ULA to launch a consultative ballot in late 2025. The results were resounding: 92.5% to 93% of members voted in favor of strike action and action short of strikes (ASOS), surpassing statutory thresholds and empowering the union to proceed.

At the heart of the disagreement is ENU management's refusal to commit to a 'no compulsory redundancy' policy. Union branch secretary Nick Cimini has repeatedly described the cuts as 'totally unnecessary and unfair,' asserting that the university holds sufficient financial reserves to weather current challenges without resorting to such measures. This stance underscores a broader narrative in Scottish higher education, where institutions grapple with declining revenues from international student fees—a sector hit hard by UK visa restrictions and geopolitical shifts.

Timeline of Industrial Action at ENU

The path to April's strikes has been marked by escalating walkouts. Initial action kicked off in February 2026 with dates on the 10th, 12th, 16th, 20th, and 24th-26th, followed by March dates on the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th. Further planned strikes in mid-to-late March were suspended amid talks, but momentum rebuilt, culminating in the April schedule. EIS-ULA has boosted strike pay to 75% for affected days, signaling sustained resolve.

• August 2025: ENU announces up to 70 job cuts.
• January 2026: Overwhelming ballot support for strikes.
• February-March 2026: Multiple strike days with pickets at all campuses.
• March 2026: Partial suspension; parliamentarians table early day motion voicing concern.
• April 2026: Eight days of strikes confirmed, starting 13th.

This chronology illustrates the union's strategy of targeted disruption to pressure management, while minimizing long-term harm to students.

Edinburgh Napier's Financial Landscape

ENU, founded in 1992 as one of Scotland's post-1992 universities, has long emphasized vocational and professional programs in areas like engineering, health sciences, and business. However, like peers such as the University of Edinburgh and Glasgow Caledonian, it faces mounting deficits. While specific 2026 figures for ENU remain undisclosed, sector-wide trends paint a grim picture: Scottish universities are pursuing over £200 million in savings, with at least 1,000 jobs lost industry-wide by early 2026.

Key drivers include a post-Brexit drop in EU students, tightened international recruitment amid UK visa caps, and stagnant government funding tied to frozen tuition fees. ENU's leadership contends these cuts are essential for sustainability, but critics like EIS General Secretary Andrea Bradley counter that reserves—potentially tens of millions—should be tapped first to protect frontline staff and student experience.

Broader Crisis in Scottish Higher Education

ENU's turmoil mirrors a 'permacrisis' across Scotland's 19 universities. Heriot-Watt University recently faced strikes over 51 job losses across its Edinburgh and Malaysia campuses. Aberdeen eyes £12 million in savings, while Glasgow Caledonian targets 100 roles to plug a £10 million hole. A Scottish Parliament briefing attributes this to insufficient public funding, over-reliance on volatile international fees (down 20-30% in some cases), and rising operational costs from inflation and energy prices.

Universities Scotland has lobbied for a funding review, warning that without intervention, course closures and quality erosion loom. This context frames ENU's actions not as isolated mismanagement but as symptoms of systemic underfunding, where institutions must balance missions of access and excellence amid fiscal squeezes.

For deeper insights into Scottish HE finances, see the Scottish Parliament briefing on university finances.

Stakeholder Perspectives: Union, Management, and Students

EIS-ULA portrays the strikes as a 'last resort' to safeguard jobs and education standards, warning that cuts exacerbate workloads—already a flashpoint in UK academia—and risk program viability. Students have voiced solidarity, with some joining pickets and expressing fears over disrupted assessments and reduced support.

Management's position, gleaned from indirect statements, emphasizes 'urgent financial challenges' necessitating restructuring for long-term viability. No public commitment to no-compulsory-redundancies has emerged, fueling impasse. An Early Day Motion in Westminster (EDM 2862) urged resolution, reflecting cross-party concern.

Students, caught in the crossfire, face potential exam deferrals and online shifts, echoing disruptions from prior actions. EIS encourages supporter participation at pickets from 8am daily.

Impacts on Students, Staff, and Courses

For ENU's 20,000+ students, strikes mean campus closures, canceled lectures, and reassigned assessments—particularly acute in practical fields like nursing and engineering. Staff endure pay deductions (offset partially by union pay) and heightened stress, with voluntary exits already thinning ranks.

Longer-term, unchecked cuts could lead to course mergers or axing niche programs, diminishing ENU's appeal. A Times Higher Education analysis notes such restructurings risk eroding research output and graduate employability in a competitive market.

Pathways to Resolution and Negotiations

Historical precedents offer hope: EIS-ULA recently resolved a similar dispute at the University of the West of Scotland via no-redundancy pledges. Ongoing talks, bolstered by parliamentary pressure, could yield compromise—perhaps phased cuts with retraining or redeployment.

EIS remains open to dialogue, urging ENU to utilize reserves and lobby Holyrood for aid. Management might concede voluntary-only measures if union tempers ASOS, like voluntary overtime bans.

Photo by 𝕡𝕒𝕨𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕤 on Unsplash

Future Outlook for ENU and Scottish HE

As strikes loom, eyes turn to a pending Scottish government funding review. Optimists predict stabilization via targeted grants; pessimists foresee mergers or insolvencies. For lecturers, this saga underscores precariousness in post-1992 universities, reliant on fee income.

ENU's response—bolstering domestic recruitment, efficiency drives, or partnerships—will shape its trajectory. Meanwhile, EIS-ULA's militancy may inspire peers, potentially coordinating sector-wide action. Stakeholders must prioritize dialogue to avert deeper crisis.

Explore related Scottish HE challenges via the EIS-ULA ENU dispute page or Herald Scotland coverage.