Equity in European Academia: Eurowhiteness and Barriers Facing Eastern Scholars

Recent discussions in European higher education are drawing attention to persistent divides that affect scholars from Central and Eastern Europe. These conversations centre on the concept of Eurowhiteness, which highlights how Western European norms and institutional practices can create subtle yet significant barriers. Scholars describe Eastern European academics as often positioned in a complex space, sometimes referred to as 'dirty whites' in contrast to more privileged Western counterparts. This framing emerges from analyses that connect broader ideas about European identity with everyday realities in universities and research settings.

The term draws from work by Hungarian sociologist József Böröcz and has been applied specifically to academia in recent studies. A 2023 paper titled Eurowhiteness in Science explores how privilege operates through administrative processes and funding structures. Interviewed in a June 2026 LSE Higher Education blog post, researchers Tamas Dezso Ziegler and Anna Unger elaborate on these dynamics, noting that Western institutions maintain dominance even as they promote openness.

Understanding Eurowhiteness in the Academic Context

Eurowhiteness refers to the implicit centering of Western European cultural, linguistic and institutional standards within the broader European project. In higher education, this manifests in expectations around publication styles, grant applications and collaboration networks that favour established Western centres. Eastern European scholars frequently encounter additional layers of scrutiny or extra administrative requirements when seeking positions or funding at Western universities.

The concept builds on earlier examinations of European integration and identity. Hans Kundnani's 2023 book Eurowhiteness: Culture, Empire and Race in the European Project examines how narratives of European unity can overlook historical and cultural hierarchies. When applied to academia, it reveals how mobility programmes and research networks, while designed to promote integration, sometimes reinforce existing divides between West and East.

Key Barriers Identified by Researchers

Interviews and studies point to several concrete challenges. Funding disparities between Western and Eastern institutions create uneven starting points for researchers. Eastern scholars often face higher administrative burdens when applying for European-level grants or positions. Language expectations, while necessary for international work, can compound difficulties when combined with differences in academic training and networks.

In elite graduate programmes, Eastern European students report feeling like numerical minorities with limited social integration. One study of a prestigious European institution found that students from the region received some of the lowest stipends compared with peers from Northern or Western countries. Recognition of prior qualifications and credits from Central and Eastern European universities can also prove inconsistent, slowing career progression.

Self-perceptions play a role as well. Some scholars describe a 'self-colonising attitude' where Eastern academics internalise assumptions about Western superiority, leading to hesitation in asserting their perspectives or pursuing leadership roles. This dynamic interacts with structural factors such as limited access to high-profile conferences or editorial positions.

Perspectives from Eastern European Academics

Researchers like Ziegler and Unger emphasise that these barriers differ from more visible forms of exclusion based on gender or visible racial categories. The issues often appear through neutral-sounding procedures such as peer review criteria or mobility requirements that unintentionally disadvantage those outside dominant networks. Eastern scholars describe feeling neither fully included nor entirely excluded, occupying an in-between status within European academia.

University administrators in Central and Eastern Europe note parallel challenges when trying to internationalise their own institutions. Limited English-language course offerings, difficulties in credit recognition and low incentives for faculty to teach in foreign languages hinder two-way mobility. These factors contribute to a sense that the benefits of European higher education cooperation flow more readily in one direction.

Photo by Helena Lila on Unsplash

Impacts on Research Collaboration and Career Paths

The divides affect the composition of research teams and the direction of scholarly inquiry. Projects involving Eastern European partners may receive less visibility or funding priority. Early-career researchers from the region report longer timelines to secure permanent positions, partly due to the need to build Western-aligned publication records.

Student experiences in international programmes reveal similar patterns. Cultural and socio-economic differences can lead to stratified social relationships, limiting the professional networks that Eastern European graduates can leverage after completing their studies. This has longer-term implications for the diversity of voices shaping European research agendas.

Institutional Responses Across Europe

Some Western universities have begun examining their recruitment and promotion practices with an eye toward greater geographic balance. Initiatives include targeted mentoring schemes and adjustments to evaluation criteria that account for different national contexts. In Central and Eastern Europe, institutions are investing in English-language programmes and partnerships to strengthen their position within European networks.

European-level bodies have supported mobility through programmes such as Erasmus+, yet evaluations show uneven participation rates. Countries in the region often rank lower in attracting incoming students and researchers, reflecting both resource constraints and perceptions of academic prestige.

Case Examples from Recent Studies

Analyses of specific graduate schools illustrate the dynamics at play. In one highly selective European programme, Eastern European students formed about 20 percent of the cohort but remained underrepresented among faculty. Stipend variations highlighted economic hierarchies even within a single institution. Such examples underscore how merit-based selection can still produce stratified outcomes when underlying conditions differ.

Broader surveys of European higher education institutions reveal that lack of awareness about equity issues and limited resources rank among the main obstacles to progress. Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe cite demographic decline and funding pressures as additional factors shaping their internationalisation strategies.

Broader Implications for European Higher Education

These discussions connect to wider debates about the future of European integration in research and teaching. Persistent East-West divides risk undermining the goal of a truly unified European higher education area. They also affect the continent's ability to attract and retain talent in a competitive global environment.

Addressing the issues requires attention to both structural reforms and cultural shifts within institutions. Greater transparency in funding allocation, more inclusive evaluation frameworks and sustained investment in capacity building across all regions could help narrow the gaps.

Photo by Paréj Richárd on Unsplash

Future Outlook and Potential Developments

As conversations continue, observers expect increased focus on geographic equity alongside existing priorities around gender and other dimensions of diversity. New European research frameworks may incorporate explicit targets for balanced participation. Universities in the region are likely to pursue stronger alliances to amplify their collective voice in policy discussions.

Longer term, success will depend on whether Western institutions adapt their practices and whether Eastern European systems receive the support needed to compete on equal terms. Ongoing monitoring through reports and academic studies will provide evidence on whether progress occurs.

Actionable Steps for Stakeholders

University leaders can review internal processes for unintended biases in recruitment and promotion. Funding agencies might consider weighting criteria to account for national contexts. Individual scholars from all regions benefit from building cross-border networks and advocating for inclusive practices.

Professional associations and learned societies have opportunities to diversify editorial boards and conference programmes. Students and early-career researchers can seek mentorship that addresses the specific challenges faced by those from Central and Eastern Europe.