Iowa's Surge of Higher Education Bills Targeting DEI and CRT

Understanding DEI and CRT in Iowa's Higher Education Landscape

In recent years, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have become central to many university operations across the United States. DEI refers to programs and policies designed to foster diverse student and faculty bodies, ensure equitable access to opportunities, and create inclusive campus environments where individuals from varied backgrounds feel supported. Similarly, Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an academic framework that examines the ways in which race and racism are embedded in legal systems and societal structures, often explored in law, sociology, and education courses.

In Iowa, these concepts have sparked significant debate, particularly at the state's public universities governed by the Iowa Board of Regents: the University of Iowa (UI), Iowa State University (ISU), and the University of Northern Iowa (UNI). Proponents argue that DEI and CRT promote fairness and prepare students for a multicultural world, while critics contend they can lead to mandatory ideological training, preferential treatment based on identity, and a departure from merit-based academic standards. This tension has fueled a wave of legislative action, building on earlier reforms and intensifying in the 2026 session.

Iowa's public universities have long been pillars of the state's economy and culture, contributing billions in research funding and educating professionals who stay to bolster local industries like agriculture, biotech, and manufacturing. However, as enrollment pressures and national culture wars intensify, lawmakers are scrutinizing how these institutions allocate resources and shape curricula.

🎓 Prior Reforms: Establishing the Foundation for Change

The current surge of bills traces back to 2024 and 2025, when Iowa enacted some of the nation's strictest anti-DEI measures. In May 2024, Governor Kim Reynolds signed Senate File 2435 into law, prohibiting public universities from maintaining DEI offices, requiring diversity statements in hiring, or providing preferential treatment based on such statements. This law took effect on July 1, 2025, forcing institutions like UI and ISU to restructure departments and reassign staff previously dedicated to DEI roles.

Building on this, House File 856, signed in May 2025, extended bans to public entities including community colleges, forbidding DEI officers, preferential hiring, and mandatory diversity training. It also barred enrolling students in DEI or CRT-related courses as part of general education or graduation requirements. These changes prompted universities to rebrand some efforts—such as shifting DEI under "civic engagement" umbrellas—to comply while preserving community outreach.

By July 2025, the impacts were visible: UI eliminated its Office of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion, reallocating resources to advising and student success programs. ISU followed suit, emphasizing merit-based scholarships instead. These reforms set the stage for 2026, where Republicans, holding supermajorities in the House and Senate, aim to deepen restrictions amid claims of lingering ideological influences.

📈 The 2026 Legislative Surge: A Barrage of Proposals

The 91st Iowa General Assembly, convening in January 2026, has introduced over 20 bills targeting higher education, with a sharp focus on DEI and CRT. House Higher Education Committee Chair Rep. Taylor Collins (R-Mediapolis) has led the charge, advancing measures through subcommittees at a rapid pace. This "barrage," as described by observers, also encompasses tuition caps, governance overhauls, and performance funding—reflecting broader Republican priorities for affordability, accountability, and alignment with workforce needs.

The session, running through April 2026, has seen heated committee hearings where crowds confronted lawmakers, chanting against perceived rollbacks of civil rights protections. Yet, proponents frame the bills as essential to ending "indoctrination" and prioritizing Iowa taxpayers' interests.

Key Bills Targeting DEI and CRT

Among the most prominent proposals are those directly addressing classroom content and faculty practices. Here's a breakdown:

These bills expand prior laws by targeting curricula and incentives, with HF 269's detailed definitions ensuring broad application. For instance, a course mentioning "social justice" in relation to U.S. society could qualify as DEI/CRT content.

Potential Impacts on Iowa's Regents Universities

If passed, these bills could profoundly reshape UI, ISU, and UNI. Curricula might shift toward core American history and government courses without "subgroup" focuses, as Rep. Collins advocates replacing "garbage" gender studies with high-demand fields like engineering and agriculture.

• Students: Greater flexibility in course selection, avoiding perceived ideological mandates. However, exemptions for ethnic studies mean specialized paths remain, though not as gen ed fillers.
• Faculty: No DEI-linked tenure/promotion pressures, potentially streamlining evaluations to teaching and research merit. Post-tenure reviews in companion bills add accountability.
• Administrators: Resource reallocation from compliance to affordability initiatives, like proposed tuition freezes for in-state undergrads until 2031.
• Broader Campus: Bans on land acknowledgments and H-1B visas for certain nationalities could alter cultural events and international hiring.

Economically, performance-based funding tied to in-state graduate retention could boost local workforce pipelines. Yet, critics warn of chilling academic freedom and enrollment drops among diverse applicants. As faculty adapt, exploring higher education faculty jobs in merit-focused environments may appeal to those prioritizing research impact.

For deeper analysis on these reforms, see this Inside Higher Ed report.

Stakeholder Reactions: A Divided Debate

Reactions underscore Iowa's polarized views. Republicans like Rep. Collins hail the bills as "cleaning up" liberal biases, emphasizing merit over identity. At hearings for HSB 668, supporters argued for updating outdated codes to foster equal opportunity.

Opponents, including Democrats like Rep. Megan Srinivas and faculty from the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), decry them as discriminatory rollbacks harming underrepresented retention. Crowds booed lawmakers, with UI's Lois Cox noting escalation but past legislative failures. United Faculty's Chris Martin worries about weakened shared governance.

University leaders, via the Board of Regents, are monitoring closely, stressing collaboration on affordability. On X (formerly Twitter), posts highlight bill advancements and rebranding concerns, fueling national attention.

Details on HF 269 can be found in the official bill text.

Iowa's Reforms in National Context

Iowa joins a trend: since 2023, 28 states have enacted anti-DEI laws, per trackers like the Council on Social Work Education. Florida and Texas pioneered comprehensive overhauls, banning DEI offices and CRT in K-12/higher ed. Alabama, Utah, and others followed in 2024.

Yet Iowa stands out for its volume—over 20 bills—and ties to Trump-era compacts, like mandating universities sign the Compact for Academic Excellence. This reflects red-state pushes for conservative curricula amid declining trust in higher ed. Track national developments at CSWE's DEI tracker.

Paths Forward: Balanced Solutions Amid Change

While debates rage, opportunities emerge for positive shifts. Universities could pivot to merit-based scholarships, bolstering programs in high-demand fields like nursing and computer science—aligning with Iowa's ag-tech economy. Enhanced career advising, free from DEI mandates, might improve graduation rates and job placement.

• Prioritize performance metrics: Tie funding to outcomes like in-state employment, benefiting graduates.
• Strengthen governance: Transparent presidential searches and faculty input ensure quality hires.
• Workforce focus: Expand higher ed career advice for roles in research and administration.

Administrators facing these transitions might explore administration jobs emphasizing operational excellence. For insights into faculty experiences, check Rate My Professor.

Explore current openings at Forbes' coverage and Iowa Capital Dispatch.

Photo by Cheryl Graham on Unsplash

Navigating Iowa's Higher Ed Evolution

Iowa's 2026 bills signal a pivotal moment for public universities, emphasizing merit, affordability, and core academics over DEI/CRT emphases. Whether they pass fully remains to be seen, but the push underscores demands for accountability. Faculty, students, and professionals can engage by following the legislature, sharing perspectives in comments below, and preparing for a merit-driven landscape.

Stay ahead with resources like higher ed jobs, rate my professor, university jobs, higher ed career advice, and post a job on AcademicJobs.com. As Iowa adapts, these tools help connect talent with opportunities in evolving institutions.