Background on Kansas' In-State Tuition Policy for Undocumented Students

The debate over in-state tuition rates for undocumented students in Kansas has roots stretching back over two decades. In 2004, the state enacted House Bill 2145, codified as Kansas Statute Annotated (K.S.A.) 76-731a. This legislation allows certain undocumented immigrants—often referred to as Dreamers, many of whom arrived in the U.S. as young children—to qualify for resident tuition rates at public postsecondary institutions. To be eligible, students must have attended an accredited Kansas high school for at least three years, graduated from a Kansas high school or obtained a GED issued in the state, and submit an affidavit affirming their intent or their parents' intent to pursue legalization of their immigration status.

This policy was signed into law by then-Governor Kathleen Sebelius, a Democrat, amid growing recognition of the contributions made by long-term resident undocumented youth to Kansas communities. Public universities and community colleges across the state, including the University of Kansas (KU), Kansas State University (KSU), Wichita State University, and Johnson County Community College (JCCC), implemented processes to verify eligibility. Students must reapply each semester, providing documentation and affidavits, with strict penalties for non-compliance, such as repayment of the tuition differential plus interest.

Under this framework, eligible students pay the same in-state rates as Kansas citizens—typically around $11,200 annually at KSU for 2025-2026—rather than out-of-state rates exceeding $28,500. This access has enabled hundreds, if not thousands, of students to pursue higher education, contributing to a more educated local workforce.

The Push to Repeal: Introduction of Senate Bill 254

Fast-forward to the 2025-2026 legislative session, and Senate Bill 254 (SB 254) emerged as a direct challenge to the 2004 law. Sponsored by Republicans and championed by Attorney General Kris Kobach, the bill seeks to prohibit any 'alien who is unlawfully present in the United States' from receiving state or local public benefits, explicitly including reduced tuition and fees at postsecondary institutions. It nullifies K.S.A. 76-731a, declaring any contrary provisions void, and requires agencies to verify lawful status via the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program.

SB 254 goes further by mandating proof of citizenship, permanent residency, or lawful presence for benefit applicants aged 18 and older, using documents akin to those for driver's licenses. While initial versions included a 'rebuttable presumption of flight risk' for undocumented individuals charged with crimes, the conference committee stripped these provisions, focusing on benefits and tuition.

Legislative Journey and Key Votes

The bill advanced swiftly through the Republican-controlled Legislature. The Kansas Senate approved an early version on January 28, 2026. The House later revived and passed a version, leading to a conference committee that struck a deal on March 10, 2026. On March 19, the House voted 78-46 to accept the conference report—short of the two-thirds majority (84 votes) needed to override a veto from Democratic Governor Laura Kelly.

As of late March 2026, the Senate had yet to vote on the final conference version, leaving the bill's fate hanging. Proponents anticipate sending it to the governor, betting on an override if vetoed. Fiscal impacts appear negligible, per state agencies like the Kansas Board of Regents, though verification processes may add minor administrative burdens.

Arguments in Favor of Repeal from Republican Lawmakers

Supporters, led by AG Kobach, argue the 2004 law violates Section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996. This federal statute bars states from offering in-state tuition to undocumented students based on residency unless the same benefit is extended to all U.S. citizens. Kobach has warned of potential U.S. Department of Justice lawsuits, especially under the Trump administration's immigration enforcement priorities.

• Prioritizes resources for legal residents and citizens who fund public education through taxes.
• Aligns Kansas with neighboring states lacking such policies.
• Discourages illegal immigration incentives.

Sen. Mike Thompson highlighted the law's 22-year 'noncompliance,' while Sen. Virgil Peck questioned subsidizing 'illegal aliens' over Americans.

Photo by Megan Burns on Unsplash

Opposition from Higher Education Advocates and Democrats

Critics, including educators, faith groups, and Democrats, decry the repeal as punitive toward youth integrated into Kansas society. Rep. Chuck Smith (R) broke ranks, noting it harms children brought by parents, blocking their path to the middle class. Rep. Heather Meyer and Rep. Rui Xu emphasized punishing contributors without addressing federal immigration reform.

Organizations like the ACLU of Kansas, Kansas National Education Association, and Johnson County Community College testified against it, warning of enrollment drops, economic losses, and legal challenges. Faith-based groups and immigrant advocates argued undocumented students already pay taxes and bolster the economy through higher education attainment.

Impacts on Kansas Students and University Enrollment

For affected students—estimated in the low thousands statewide—the shift to out-of-state rates could triple or quadruple costs, pricing higher education out of reach. At KU, eligible undocumented students follow a rigorous application process each term, underscoring their commitment. Repeal could lead to higher dropout rates, fewer degrees in fields like nursing, engineering, and agriculture where diverse talent is needed.

Universities report no fiscal strain from the program, as students pay full in-state fees. Instead, advocates highlight contributions: educated immigrants fill workforce gaps, start businesses, and pay taxes over lifetimes. A sudden policy change risks disrupting current enrollees mid-degree.

University Responses and Preparations

Kansas public institutions have long supported the policy. Wichita State University's FAQs detail eligibility, while Fort Hays State University and Colby Community College provide resources for undocumented applicants. JCCC, serving many local Dreamers, opposes repeal, citing community college access as a gateway to four-year degrees.

If enacted, universities anticipate administrative shifts to enforce SAVE verifications but worry about chilling effects on enrollment from immigrant-heavy high schools. Some may explore private scholarships or federal DACA workarounds, though federal aid remains unavailable.Wichita State Undocumented Student FAQs

National Context: Kansas Among 22 Inclusive States

Kansas joins 22 states offering in-state tuition to eligible undocumented students, per the Higher Ed Immigration Portal. Policies vary: some like California and Texas extend state aid, while others limit to tuition. Prohibitive states charge non-resident rates, correlating with lower college-going rates among undocumented youth.

Studies show such policies boost enrollment by 10-20% and long-term earnings, without displacing citizen students or raising taxes. Kansas' repeal would align it with restrictive states but buck national trends toward equity.Higher Ed Immigration Portal: Kansas Data

Photo by Nils Huenerfuerst on Unsplash

Legal and Economic Considerations

While Kobach cites IIRIRA violations, opponents note successful challenges elsewhere and Kansas' 20-year precedent without federal intervention. Economically, repealing risks lost productivity: undocumented college grads earn 50% more, paying millions in taxes. Kansas universities, facing enrollment pressures, value every paying student.

Potential Outcomes and Future Outlook for Kansas Higher Education

If vetoed and overridden, implementation could begin fall 2026, prompting lawsuits. Governor Kelly may pocket-veto or negotiate. Amid national immigration shifts, Kansas universities might pivot to recruiting legal international students or enhancing scholarships. Long-term, the policy underscores tensions between state autonomy and federal mandates in higher ed access.

Solutions-oriented paths include federal Dream Act revival or state workarounds like performance-based aid. For now, Kansas higher education watches closely, balancing fairness, legality, and institutional vitality.