Background on Enamed and Its Role in Brazilian Medical Education
The Exame Nacional de Avaliação da Formação Médica, known as Enamed, represents a significant development in the oversight of medical training across Brazil. Launched by the Ministério da Educação (MEC) and implemented by the Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (Inep) in collaboration with the Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares (Ebserh), the exam began in 2025 as an annual assessment. It integrates elements of the Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes (Enade) for medicine courses with the objective component of the Exame Nacional de Residência (Enare), aiming to verify whether graduating students have acquired the competencies outlined in the Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais (DCNs) for medicine programs.
Medical schools in Brazil, both public and private, face increasing scrutiny through this unified instrument. The first edition highlighted performance gaps, with more than 100 courses receiving insufficient concepts, leading to sanctions on 54 institutions, the majority private. These measures underscore the exam's function not only as a student evaluation tool but also as a mechanism for institutional accountability and quality improvement in higher education.
The Proposal for Two Annual Editions Starting in 2027
The MEC is actively evaluating the implementation of two editions of Enamed each year beginning in 2027. This consideration emerged during discussions with representatives from the Associação dos Mantenedores Independentes Educadores do Ensino Superior (Amies), reflecting a strategic push to enhance the frequency and responsiveness of medical training assessments. Officials view the change as a way to provide more timely data on student performance and course quality while supporting broader goals of strengthening the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS).
Currently annual, the exam's expansion to semiannual applications would allow for quicker feedback loops. The 2026 edition, with its edital published on May 29, 2026, already introduces the requirement for fourth-year students alongside concluding students, expanding the scope of evaluation mid-program. Results from the September 13, 2026, application are expected to inform ongoing refinements.
Objectives and Structure of the Enamed
Enamed serves multiple interconnected purposes within Brazil's higher education framework. Primary among them is confirming that medical graduates possess the skills demanded by national curriculum guidelines. It also supplies diagnostic information to institutions for curriculum enhancement and contributes to a more transparent and standardized pathway into medical residency programs through Enare.
The exam unifies previously separate assessment matrices, reducing duplication for students while promoting consistency. For those intending to use results in residency selections, a registration fee applies, though Enade participants without residency ambitions are exempt. Individual bulletins and institutional concepts provide layered insights, supporting both personal career planning and systemic monitoring by the MEC.
Implications for Medical Schools and University Administrators
University leaders and administrators in medicine programs stand to experience notable shifts if two editions become standard. More frequent testing could intensify pressure on institutions to maintain high standards year-round, particularly as sanctions for underperformance remain in effect until subsequent results are released. Private institutions, which account for the bulk of sanctioned programs in the initial round, may need to accelerate investments in faculty development, infrastructure, and student support services.
Public universities, though fewer in number among those penalized, will also navigate heightened expectations. The change aligns with broader MEC efforts to elevate medical education quality amid rapid expansion of medicine courses nationwide. Administrators may find value in aligning internal evaluations more closely with Enamed frameworks to anticipate outcomes and mitigate risks.
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
Impacts on Students and Residency Pathways
Medical students stand to benefit from greater flexibility. With results potentially valid for up to three years in Enare selections—subject to individual edital rules—candidates gain options to reapply or leverage prior performance without retaking the exam immediately. The inclusion of fourth-year students from 2026 onward offers earlier benchmarking, helping identify areas for targeted improvement before graduation.
This frequency increase could streamline transitions from undergraduate studies to residency, reducing bottlenecks in a competitive field. Formed physicians seeking to strengthen their profiles for direct-access residency programs would also encounter more regular opportunities to demonstrate proficiency.
Stakeholder Perspectives and Broader Context
Amies has expressed support for Enamed while advocating refinements in future iterations. The association represents independent higher education maintainers and sees the exam as preferable to alternative proposals. In contrast, the Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM) has advanced a separate proficiency exam model, sometimes referred to in discussions as an "OAB da Medicina," which the MEC has positioned Enamed against.
Recent legislative developments, including Senate approval of a related bill, highlight ongoing debates about professional entry standards. The MEC's approach emphasizes integration with existing systems like Enade and Enare rather than creating entirely new barriers. Student groups and medical associations continue to monitor implementation details, particularly around exam content, scoring via Teoria de Resposta ao Item (TRI), and result utilization rules.
Challenges in Implementation
Scaling to two editions annually presents logistical considerations for Inep and partner entities. Expanding application sites, managing increased registration volumes, and ensuring consistent standards across regions require robust planning. Institutions must prepare students for more frequent assessments without disrupting academic calendars.
Equity concerns also arise, as access to preparatory resources may vary between well-resourced urban programs and those in less developed areas. The MEC and Inep will need to address these through targeted support and transparent communication of criteria.
Future Outlook for Medical Higher Education in Brazil
Should the two-edition model proceed, Enamed could become a cornerstone of ongoing quality assurance in Brazilian medical education. Enhanced frequency supports continuous improvement cycles, potentially elevating overall graduate preparedness for SUS roles and residency demands. University rankings and accreditation processes may increasingly incorporate Enamed data alongside other metrics.
Longer term, this evolution could influence policy on course approvals, faculty qualifications, and international collaborations. As Brazil continues to expand its medical workforce, tools like Enamed help balance quantity with quality, fostering a more resilient health education system.
Administrators and faculty interested in related opportunities can explore positions through specialized platforms focused on Brazilian higher education roles.
Practical Considerations for Institutions
Medical schools preparing for the shift should review current performance data from the 2025 edition and align curricula with DCNs more explicitly. Regular internal simulations and faculty training on assessment standards can build readiness. Collaboration with Inep through official channels remains essential for updates on edital changes and result interpretation.
Stakeholders are encouraged to follow announcements from the MEC and Inep for definitive timelines and procedural guidelines as evaluations continue.
