ACER Research Underscores Residential Advantages in Australian Higher Education

Australian university students who reside on campus demonstrate higher levels of engagement, stronger feelings of support, and enhanced personal development compared to their peers living off campus. This finding emerges from analysis of data collected through the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE), as detailed in a research briefing from the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).

The briefing draws on responses from thousands of students across Australian and New Zealand institutions, highlighting how proximity to campus resources fosters deeper connections with academic and social opportunities. Students in residential settings report more frequent interactions with faculty, greater participation in collaborative learning activities, and improved access to support services.

Understanding Student Engagement in the Australian Context

Student engagement encompasses the time and effort students invest in activities that contribute to desired learning outcomes. In Australia, this concept is measured through surveys like AUSSE, which align with international frameworks such as the National Survey of Student Engagement used in the United States. Key indicators include active learning, student-staff interactions, enriching educational experiences, and supportive campus environments.

Regulatory bodies including the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) emphasise engagement as a critical factor in institutional performance and student success. Recent reports from the Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success (ACSES) further illustrate that external or off-campus study modes often correlate with reduced peer interaction and lower satisfaction levels.

Key Findings from the ACER Briefing on Residential Living

Analysis of AUSSE data reveals consistent patterns: on-campus residents score higher across multiple engagement benchmarks. They report stronger peer relationships, more involvement in campus events, and better overall adjustment to university life. These outcomes hold across diverse student demographics, including domestic and international enrolments.

Residential colleges, a longstanding feature at institutions such as the University of Melbourne, University of Sydney, and University of Queensland, provide structured environments that amplify these benefits. Catered options and living-learning communities encourage regular academic discussions and social integration.

• Enhanced collaborative learning through proximity to study groups and resources
• Increased staff-student interactions via informal campus encounters
• Greater sense of belonging leading to improved retention intentions

Broader Impacts on Retention and Success

Engagement directly influences retention rates and academic performance. Students living on campus show greater persistence, with data indicating they are more likely to complete their degrees. This aligns with observations in recent ACSES publications on mode of attendance, where external students face higher risks of isolation and disengagement.

Universities Australia and individual institutions have responded by expanding purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA). Pipeline reports highlight thousands of new beds approved in recent years, addressing demand in major cities like Sydney and Melbourne.

Photo by Declan Sun on Unsplash

Stakeholder Perspectives Across the Sector

University administrators view on-campus housing as a strategic investment in student experience. Residential life staff design programs that integrate academic support with social activities, fostering inclusive communities.

Students themselves often cite convenience, safety, and community as primary reasons for choosing campus living. International students, in particular, benefit from the immersive environment that eases cultural transition.

Policy makers at the Department of Education note the role of accommodation in supporting equity goals, especially for regional and low-socioeconomic background students who may otherwise commute long distances.

Challenges and Considerations in Expanding Residential Options

While benefits are clear, scaling on-campus living involves hurdles. Construction costs, land availability in urban campuses, and affordability for students remain key concerns. Purpose-built developments must balance quality with accessibility.

Recent data from the Property Council of Australia’s Student Accommodation Council shows a growing pipeline, yet unmet demand persists in several states. Institutions are exploring partnerships with private providers to accelerate supply.

Case Examples from Australian Universities

At the University of New England, residential colleges emphasise academic support alongside social engagement, with ACER-linked research cited in their accommodation materials. Similar models operate at the University of Wollongong and Flinders University, where living-learning communities target specific cohorts such as first-year or STEM students.

These examples demonstrate measurable gains in engagement metrics tracked through internal surveys and national benchmarks.

Future Outlook and Policy Implications

As Australian higher education evolves, on-campus living is poised to play an expanded role in student success strategies. Integration with digital tools, flexible accommodation models, and targeted equity initiatives will shape developments.

TEQSA’s focus on engagement and ACSES equity reports suggest continued emphasis on residential options as part of holistic support frameworks. Institutions are encouraged to monitor outcomes through ongoing AUSSE-style assessments.

Photo by Osmany M Leyva Aldana on Unsplash

Actionable Insights for Institutions and Students

Universities can enhance residential offerings by prioritising living-learning communities, expanding tutoring programs, and ensuring inclusive design. Students considering options should evaluate proximity to academic facilities, community programs, and support services.

Prospective residents are advised to review application timelines and scholarship opportunities tied to on-campus living at their chosen institution.