UK Universities Reject Elsevier Deal: Sheffield, Lancaster, and Surrey Opt Out of 2026 Agreement

🎓 UK Universities Signal Shift in Academic Publishing Landscape

In a significant development for the UK's higher education sector, several prominent universities have chosen not to renew their agreements with Elsevier, one of the world's largest academic publishers. The University of Sheffield, Lancaster University, and the University of Surrey have joined the likes of Essex, Kent, and Sussex in opting out of the proposed three-year Read & Publish deal for 2026 onwards. This decision comes amid ongoing financial pressures and a push for more sustainable open access models in scholarly communication.

These moves highlight a growing trend dubbed 'silent decoupling,' where institutions quietly step away from national deals negotiated by Jisc, the UK's higher education IT and research organization. While most universities are expected to participate in the agreements with the 'big five' publishers—Elisevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, and Sage—a handful are prioritizing fiscal responsibility over comprehensive access to all publisher portfolios.

The rejections underscore the tension between the high costs of academic publishing and the need to allocate budgets effectively in an era of constrained funding. For researchers, this could mean adapting to new ways of accessing and sharing knowledge, but it also opens doors to innovative alternatives.

Understanding Read & Publish Agreements and Jisc's Role

Read & Publish (R&P) agreements represent a hybrid model in academic publishing, combining traditional subscription access to journals (the 'read' component) with funding for open access publication fees (the 'publish' component). These transformative deals aim to transition scholarly output from paywalled subscriptions to freely accessible articles without additional costs to authors.

Jisc has been instrumental in negotiating these deals on behalf of UK universities since 2018. In December 2025, after nine months of intensive talks, Jisc announced landmark agreements with all five major publishers for 2026-2028. The previous deals, which expired at the end of 2025, cost the sector approximately £112 million annually—a figure universities sought to reduce by 5-15% in the new round.

Under the Jisc framework, institutions are banded by size and research output to determine fees, allowing flexibility for opt-ins or opt-outs. While hailed as a 'global first' for decoupling pricing from publication volume, not all universities find the terms viable. For more on Jisc's achievements, see their official announcement.

Financial Unsustainability Drives Decisions

The primary driver behind these opt-outs is the sheer financial burden. Elsevier's portfolio includes over 2,800 journals, encompassing prestigious titles like Cell and The Lancet. However, amid rising operational costs, declining public funding, and inflationary pressures, universities are forced to scrutinize every expenditure.

• Library budgets are under strain, with many institutions proposing multi-year reductions in resource spending.
• Teaching-focused universities argue they subsidize research-intensive peers under R&P models, as fees fund open access articles disproportionately benefiting high-output institutions.
• Annual subscription reviews emphasize value for money, leading to prioritization of other publishers' deals.

Sheffield, for instance, explicitly stated the deal's 'financial unsustainability' aligns with broader cost-cutting measures. This reflects a sector-wide reality: UK higher education faces a perfect storm of frozen tuition fees, staff wage pressures, and infrastructure investments.

Spotlight on Sheffield, Lancaster, and Surrey

The University of Sheffield led with a public statement on January 27, 2026: 'Unfortunately, the Elsevier deal continues to be financially unsustainable and we will not be in a position to subscribe to this deal.' Having previously terminated its prior agreement in early 2025 alongside Surrey and York, Sheffield is focusing on 'big deals' with Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley.

Lancaster University confirmed: 'While agreements with Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis and Wiley for 2026 onwards are in place following Jisc negotiations, [the university’s] deal with Elsevier has not been renewed.'

The University of Surrey followed suit, opting out without detailed public reasons but aligning with the financial prudence shown by peers. These Russell Group and research-intensive institutions demonstrate that even high-profile players are unwilling to overextend.

Other opt-outs include:

• University of Essex: Cited price hikes and Elsevier's slow pivot to sustainable open access.
• Universities of Kent and Sussex: Similar cost concerns.
• University of York and Swansea University: Extended decoupling from Elsevier and others.

📊 Impacts on Researchers and Access

Researchers at opting-out universities will lose institutional access to Elsevier content starting 2026, potentially complicating literature reviews, collaborations, and grant applications. However, mitigations exist:

• Interlibrary loans and pay-per-view options.
• Free preprint servers like arXiv, bioRxiv, and medRxiv.
• Publisher green open access routes via repositories.
• Individual researcher agreements or walk-in access at other institutions.

Early experiences from York, Sheffield, and Surrey in 2025 suggest minimal disruption, with researchers adapting via these channels. For deeper analysis, refer to Times Higher Education's coverage.

Broader Financial Pressures in UK Higher Education

UK universities operate in a precarious fiscal environment. Domestic tuition fees have been capped at £9,250 since 2017, while international student numbers fluctuate due to visa policies. Research funding from UKRI and others is competitive, leaving little room for escalating journal costs, which have risen faster than inflation.

The 'big deal' model, while advancing open access, perpetuates publisher profits—Elsevier's margins exceed 37%. Critics argue it entrenches oligopolies, prompting calls for not-for-profit alternatives like diamond open access (free to read and publish).

David Prosser of Research Libraries UK notes this decoupling could extend to double figures, signaling a paradigm shift.

Exploring Alternatives and Positive Pathways Forward

Opting out isn't a dead end; it's an opportunity for innovation:

• National Licences: Jisc's core subscriptions provide baseline access.
• Consortia Models: Smaller groups negotiating bespoke deals.
• Open Access Platforms: SCOAP³, Plan S-compliant journals, and institutional repositories.
• AI Tools: Discovery platforms like Connected Papers or Elicit for navigating fragmented access.
• Policy Advocacy: Pushing for cOAlition S reforms to cap APCs.

For academics navigating these changes, resources like AcademicJobs.com's career advice can help in adapting publication strategies amid shifting landscapes.

Elsevier's Response and Outlook

Elsevier remains optimistic: 'Delighted to see a high level of participation... while recognising that financial pressures mean a handful of institutions will need to work with us individually.' The publisher emphasizes collaboration with Jisc for equitable open access.

Looking ahead, expect more opt-outs, customized deals, and accelerated adoption of preprints. Institutions like Cambridge, Edinburgh, and Oxford continue full participation, balancing access with costs. This episode may catalyze faster transformation toward sustainable scholarly communication.

For those in higher education, staying informed is key. Explore higher ed jobs or university jobs on AcademicJobs.com to connect with institutions leading these changes.

Photo by mdreza jalali on Unsplash

Wrapping Up: Navigating the New Era in Academic Publishing

The decisions by Sheffield, Lancaster, Surrey, and others mark a pivotal moment, prioritizing sustainability over status quo. Researchers are proving resilient, and the sector is inching toward fairer models.

Share your experiences in the comments below—what's your take on publisher deals? For career support, check Rate My Professor, higher ed jobs, higher ed career advice, and university jobs. Stay ahead in academia with AcademicJobs.com.