Rate My Professor Frédéric Dau

This comment is not public.

Here is the English translation of the text, maintaining its formal, critical tone: Mr. Dau's classes perfectly illustrate the gap between knowing a subject and knowing how to teach it. The material is merely delivered, not taught: interactions during lectures are condescending, the environment is one where asking a question exposes you to disparaging remarks, and there is a total lack of visible interest in whether or not students actually understand. The resulting work environment is toxic. Students attend class just to copy down notes, while real learning happens elsewhere (textbooks, peer support, external resources)—which raises serious questions about the added value of Mr. Dau's course. The failure rates for this module should not be interpreted as a reflection of the students' academic level, but rather as a genuine indicator of pedagogical quality. Furthermore, Mr. Dau repeatedly draws comparisons between his own academic background and that of first-year students. Beyond the inappropriate nature of this exercise—the sheer asymmetry making any comparison meaningless—it establishes a pedagogical relationship based on hierarchy rather than the transmission of knowledge. I highly recommend that the teaching committee observe a session and compare the number of questions asked in this class versus other modules: the difference will speak for itself.

This comment is not public.

This comment is not public.