Bad Professors
The latest low-rated professor reviews from students (320 reviews).
| Ranking | Comment | Institution | Created |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | Rating him a 1 is already being too nice. It feels like your getting transported back in high school and this white old teacher who looks like he hasn't smiled in years tells u to put away your phone constantly and threatens to smash your phone in front of the whole class. He also doesn't let u even talk softly in class and also checks your laptop screens for no reason. He don't dgaf about any problems the students had, in short i don't recommend. | RMIT University | Aug 23, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Cofnas the fascist! | Ghent University | Aug 22, 2026 |
| 1.00 | This is the worst lecturer I have ever seen at VU. She cannot explain theory or calculations clearly. She is a shame to VU. | Victoria University | Aug 22, 2026 |
| 1.00 | poor leadership | University at Buffalo | Aug 21, 2026 |
| 1.00 | If I could rate him a zero then I would or even below honestly | University of Canberra | Aug 21, 2026 |
| 1.00 | If I could rate him a zero then I would or even below honestly | University of Canberra | Aug 21, 2026 |
| 1.00 | teaches good but behaviour is far from even slightly okay | Delhi University | Aug 20, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Had her a few years back. Won’t solve doubts without shaming you | Delhi University | Aug 20, 2026 |
| 2.00 | Very interesting classes and topics, but the way it's presented just wants me to already quit the class. | Katholieke Universiteit Leuven | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 2.00 | Very interesting classes and topics, but the way it's presented just wants me to already quit the class. | Katholieke Universiteit Leuven | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Incredibly racist and ableist. A hard marker. The only person I know that got same grade as me is (coincidentally) a person of the same nationality as me. I returned back to uni from abroad to hold an appeal meeting to bring arguments why my essay did not deserve 27%, she dismissed me without properly listening. I was not even informed of my right to re-do the credits next term selecting other modules. Up to this day I am utterly traumatized and the mark I graduated with affects me until today. | University of Waikato | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 2.00 | Has her own agenda - dismisses student opinions over her own or other professors, even when they were doing something inappropriate | University of Queensland | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | صراحه ماعنده اسلوب وشايف نفسه ويصارخ جنه نشتغل عنده وفوق هذا لهجته مش واضحه ف الشرح الدكتور اعتقد جزائري وشرحه مش واضح بسبب اللهجة | Abu Dhabi University | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | صراحه ماعنده اسلوب وشايف نفسه ويصارخ جنه نشتغل عنده وفوق هذا لهجته مش واضحه ف الشرح الدكتور اعتقد جزائري وشرحه مش واضح بسبب اللهجة | Abu Dhabi University | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | she is very rude. | High Point University | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Poor quality Supervision | University at Buffalo | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Rude beyond words | Indian Institute of Technology Bombay | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Very biased professor. | American University of Sharjah | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 2.00 | she's really nice but its really easy to be lost in her class as she's a very slow and soft-spoken talker | University of Notre Dame Australia | Aug 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Grades VERY strictly. Has about a 30% pass rate for FSK 116. | University of Pretoria | Aug 18, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Grades VERY strictly. Has about a 30% pass rate for FSK 116. | University of Pretoria | Aug 18, 2026 |
| 2.00 | Makes learning exciting and meaningful. | Uppsala University | Aug 18, 2026 |
| 1.00 | rude | Nanyang Technological University, Singapore | Aug 18, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Summary: Only suitable for highly independent PhD candidates who require zero guidance. For Master’s students, his supervision style is actively damaging and can jeopardize your future academic career. Core Issues with Supervision and Grading: 1. Contradictory Feedback & Unfair Grading: Throughout several interviews (so called defense sessions), the professor explicitly praised my written thesis, calling it remarkably well-written and admirable. I even received the highest grade in the thesis seminar presentation because my topic and research approach were exceptionally strong. Despite this, he used the oral interviews to intentionally trap me with hyper-specific questions to justify giving me a mediocre grade, claiming my "understanding was bad." 2. Severe Bias Against Working Students: If you secure a job before graduation, this professor automatically assumes you are neglecting your studies. Instead of evaluating the actual written work fairly, he used the defense interviews punitively to validate his assumption that I "only cared about the job." 3. Unreasonably Harsh Standards Compared to the University: Other professors across different technology and engineering departments in this same university do not even conduct oral defense interviews; they grade directly based on the quality of the written work and award good grades fairly. This professor, however, expects independent PhD-level expertise from a Master's student without providing the foundational guidance a supervisor is supposed to give. 4. Damaging Academic Consequences: While my grades across all other courses were excellent, this single supervisor's biased and unfair grading heavily impacted my GPA. As a result, it ruined my opportunities for PhD admissions and research positions in academia. Advice to Future Students: Do not be fooled by his impressive research profile. Avoid choosing him as a supervisor if you are planning a future career in academia or if you intend to work towards the end of your studies. His grading process is deeply biased and can ruin your academic prospects, even if your actual thesis write-up is outstanding. | University of Turku | Aug 18, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Summary: Only suitable for highly independent PhD candidates who require zero guidance. For Master’s students, his supervision style is actively damaging and can jeopardize your future academic career. Core Issues with Supervision and Grading: 1. Contradictory Feedback & Unfair Grading: Throughout several interviews (so called defense sessions), the professor explicitly praised my written thesis, calling it remarkably well-written and admirable. I even received the highest grade in the thesis seminar presentation because my topic and research approach were exceptionally strong. Despite this, he used the oral interviews to intentionally trap me with hyper-specific questions to justify giving me a mediocre grade, claiming my "understanding was bad." 2. Severe Bias Against Working Students: If you secure a job before graduation, this professor automatically assumes you are neglecting your studies. Instead of evaluating the actual written work fairly, he used the defense interviews punitively to validate his assumption that I "only cared about the job." 3. Unreasonably Harsh Standards Compared to the University: Other professors across different technology and engineering departments in this same university do not even conduct oral defense interviews; they grade directly based on the quality of the written work and award good grades fairly. This professor, however, expects independent PhD-level expertise from a Master's student without providing the foundational guidance a supervisor is supposed to give. 4. Damaging Academic Consequences: While my grades across all other courses were excellent, this single supervisor's biased and unfair grading heavily impacted my GPA. As a result, it ruined my opportunities for PhD admissions and research positions in academia. Advice to Future Students: Do not be fooled by his impressive research profile. Avoid choosing him as a supervisor if you are planning a future career in academia or if you intend to work towards the end of your studies. His grading process is deeply biased and can ruin your academic prospects, even if your actual thesis write-up is outstanding. | University of Turku | Aug 18, 2026 |