Gun violence continues to exact a heavy toll on South African society, and a newly published editorial in the South African Medical Journal underscores its status as a neglected public health emergency. Authored by researchers affiliated with the University of Cape Town and Gun Free South Africa, the piece calls for a fundamental shift in how the country addresses firearm-related harm, moving beyond criminal justice frameworks toward integrated public health strategies. For South Africa’s higher education sector, the implications are particularly acute, affecting student safety on campuses, the training of future health professionals, and the research agendas of universities across the country.

University Researchers Lead the Call for Change

The editorial, titled “Gun violence – South Africa’s neglected public health emergency,” appears in the June 2026 issue of the South African Medical Journal. Lead author Dean Peacock from the University of Cape Town’s School of Public Health, together with Professor Pradeep Navsaria of Groote Schuur Hospital and UCT’s Faculty of Health Sciences, and Claire Taylor of Gun Free South Africa, argue that firearm violence places an immense and under-recognised burden on the national health system. They note that President Cyril Ramaphosa highlighted alcohol and firearms as key drivers of violence in his 2026 State of the Nation Address, signalling potential regulatory strengthening. University-based experts are at the forefront of this reframing, drawing on clinical data from trauma units and community studies to demonstrate the need for hospital-based violence intervention programmes and improved surveillance.

The Scale of Firearm Harm in South Africa

Firearm injuries represent one of the most resource-intensive forms of trauma treated in public hospitals. Data referenced in the editorial and related studies show that gunshot wounds often require prolonged surgical care, intensive care unit stays, and extensive rehabilitation. This strain is felt acutely in provinces with high urban densities where universities are concentrated. Health sciences faculties at institutions such as the University of Cape Town, University of the Witwatersrand, and Stellenbosch University train many of the doctors, nurses, and emergency personnel who manage these cases daily. The editorial emphasises that treating gun violence solely as a policing matter has left the health sector without adequate policy tools or funding streams to address prevention and recovery systematically.

Campus Safety and Student Well-being

South African universities have long grappled with safety concerns that intersect with broader patterns of gun violence. Reports from student organisations and institutional surveys indicate that fear of firearm-related incidents affects mental health, academic performance, and campus life. Residences and surrounding areas in cities such as Johannesburg, Durban, and Cape Town have recorded incidents that underscore the urgency of the public health framing. University administrators are increasingly looking to evidence-based approaches, including those advocated in the SAMJ editorial, to inform security protocols, counselling services, and partnerships with local health authorities. Public health and criminology departments are well positioned to contribute research that links campus environments to national trends in firearm availability and injury.

Photo by Clinton Chiloane on Unsplash

Training the Next Generation of Health Professionals

Medical and nursing curricula at South African universities are beginning to incorporate modules on violence as a public health issue. The SAMJ editorial provides timely teaching material for faculties of health sciences, highlighting the value of trauma-informed care and inter-professional collaboration. Students at UCT’s Groote Schuur Hospital complex, for example, encounter the realities of firearm injuries in their clinical rotations. Integrating the editorial’s recommendations into postgraduate programmes could strengthen competencies in injury surveillance, community engagement, and policy advocacy. Regulatory bodies such as the Health Professions Council of South Africa and the Council on Higher Education may consider how accreditation standards can better reflect these emerging public health priorities.

Research Agendas and Data Gaps

One of the editorial’s central recommendations is to make firearm injuries legally notifiable, akin to certain infectious diseases, to improve data collection and prevention planning. University research centres, including those at the University of Cape Town and the South African Medical Research Council-affiliated units, are already generating the evidence base needed to support such policy shifts. Gaps remain in longitudinal studies tracking the long-term educational and economic impacts on survivors, many of whom are young adults in the age groups heavily represented in university populations. Funding opportunities through the National Research Foundation and international collaborations could accelerate work in this area, positioning South African universities as leaders in global firearm violence research.

Policy Implications for Higher Education Institutions

University leadership bodies such as Universities South Africa have opportunities to engage with the Department of Higher Education and Training on safety frameworks that incorporate public health perspectives. The editorial’s call for multi-sectoral action aligns with existing initiatives around gender-based violence prevention on campuses. By treating gun violence as a public health emergency, institutions can advocate for dedicated resources in student wellness programmes, staff training, and infrastructure improvements. Partnerships between universities and civil society organisations like Gun Free South Africa offer models for community-engaged scholarship that benefits both academic and surrounding communities.

Challenges in Implementation

Despite the compelling case presented in the SAMJ editorial, systemic barriers persist. Resource constraints in public universities, competing priorities in health sciences faculties, and the need for cross-departmental coordination can slow progress. Historical under-investment in violence prevention research means that many institutions are still building capacity in this domain. Nevertheless, the involvement of senior academics from leading universities signals growing institutional commitment. The editorial provides a clear roadmap that can be adapted to the specific contexts of different higher education institutions, from historically disadvantaged universities to research-intensive ones.

Photo by Dominique Jeftha on Unsplash

Looking Ahead: Opportunities for Academic Leadership

The publication of this editorial coincides with renewed national attention to violence prevention. South African universities have the expertise, student populations, and community reach to play a constructive role in translating public health recommendations into practice. Future issues of journals hosted by university presses and collaborative research projects could build directly on the SAMJ piece. For PhD candidates and early-career researchers, the topic offers rich avenues for impactful work that addresses one of the country’s most pressing social challenges while advancing academic careers.

Conclusion

The SAMJ editorial reframes gun violence as a public health emergency with direct relevance to South Africa’s higher education community. By highlighting the burden on health services, the need for better data, and the potential for hospital- and community-based interventions, the authors provide a foundation for universities to strengthen their contributions to safety, training, and research. As institutions continue to navigate complex safety landscapes, evidence from sources such as this editorial will be essential in shaping responsive policies and practices that protect students, staff, and surrounding communities.