Australia's Universities at the Forefront of National AI Strategy
The Tech Policy Design Institute (TPDi) has released its landmark report, 'From AI Sovereignty to AI Agency', providing the first independent, evidence-based assessment of Australia's position in the global AI landscape. Released in June 2026, the paper and accompanying AI Agency Tool shift the conversation from the often-vague notion of 'AI sovereignty' to the more actionable concept of 'AI agency' — defined as a nation's capacity to maintain access, control, choice and leverage across the AI ecosystem.
Australian higher education institutions played a central role in shaping this assessment. Over 250 experts, including representatives from universities such as the University of Melbourne, UNSW, University of Queensland, University of Sydney and RMIT, contributed through workshops and consultations. Their input helped map 103 AI capabilities across six layers: infrastructure and resources, data assets and lifecycle management, models and applications, innovation and adoption, skills, and governance.
Defining AI Agency for Policymakers and Academics
TPDi argues that 'AI sovereignty' has proven too ambiguous for practical policy-making. Instead, the new framework measures a country's ability to exercise meaningful influence over AI development and deployment. The tool evaluates capabilities on a spectrum, identifying where Australia holds 'very high agency' in eight areas and highlighting dependencies that require strategic attention.
Universities are explicitly positioned as key enablers. The report notes strong Australian research output in areas such as trustworthy AI, quantum-enhanced machine learning and ethical governance frameworks. These strengths align directly with the missions of Go8 institutions and emerging research universities, positioning them as critical partners in national strategy.
University Research Strengths and Gaps Identified
The assessment reveals that Australian universities lead in several foundational research domains. For example, institutions like the University of Sydney and UNSW have developed internationally recognised expertise in AI safety and alignment, contributing to global standards. Similarly, CSIRO-linked university partnerships have advanced sovereign data infrastructure capabilities.
However, the report flags gaps in advanced semiconductor design, large-scale model training infrastructure and certain high-performance computing resources. These limitations affect the ability of Australian researchers to compete at the absolute frontier without international collaboration — a dynamic that universities navigate daily through partnerships with global leaders.
Photo by Jeremy Huang on Unsplash
Skills Development and the Higher Education Pipeline
One of the most pressing findings concerns the skills layer. While Australia produces strong graduates in computer science and data analytics, the report highlights shortages in specialised AI engineering, AI ethics and interdisciplinary talent capable of translating research into industry applications. Universities are responding with new micro-credentials, industry co-designed degrees and expanded PhD programs focused on applied AI.
TPDi recommends targeted investment in higher education to close these gaps, echoing calls from Universities Australia for sustained funding that supports both foundational research and workforce-ready graduates.
International Collaboration and Sovereign Choices
The report emphasises that genuine AI agency does not mean isolation. Rather, it involves strategic choices about partnerships. Australian universities have long excelled at international research collaboration, and the TPDi framework encourages policymakers to leverage these networks while protecting critical capabilities.
Examples include joint AI ethics initiatives between the University of Melbourne and European partners, and quantum-AI projects involving the University of Queensland and international consortia. These efforts demonstrate how universities can help Australia maintain leverage even when full self-sufficiency is unrealistic.
Implications for University Governance and Funding
The assessment carries direct consequences for higher education policy. Recommendations include greater alignment between research funding and national AI priorities, enhanced data governance frameworks for university-led projects, and clearer pathways for commercialisation of academic IP. Institutions are already reviewing their AI strategies in light of the tool's capability maps.
TPDi's emphasis on measurable agency provides universities with a practical language to articulate their value to government and industry, potentially strengthening cases for increased research investment.
Photo by Eriksson Luo on Unsplash
Case Studies from Australian Campuses
Several universities have already begun applying elements of the AI Agency Tool internally. The University of New South Wales, for instance, is using capability-mapping exercises to guide its AI research portfolio. At the University of Queensland, interdisciplinary teams are exploring how agency metrics can inform curriculum design in emerging AI-related degrees.
These early adopters illustrate how the report moves beyond abstract policy debate to concrete institutional decision-making.
Future Outlook for Higher Education and National AI Ambition
Looking ahead, the TPDi framework suggests Australia is well-placed to increase its AI agency if universities, government and industry coordinate effectively. The report calls for sustained investment in research infrastructure, talent pipelines and ethical governance — areas where higher education institutions are uniquely positioned to lead.
As Australia navigates an increasingly competitive global AI environment, the contribution of its universities will be decisive. The TPDi report provides both a diagnostic tool and a call to action for the sector to step forward as strategic partners in shaping the nation's technological future.
