Groundbreaking Study Reveals Citation Patterns in Retracted Indian-Funded Research
A recent analysis of retracted publications supported by Indian public funding agencies has shed new light on how these papers continue to influence the scientific record even after withdrawal. The study examined 368 retracted papers indexed in the Web of Science that acknowledge support from Indian agencies between 2000 and 2024. Researchers found that citation patterns before and after retraction vary significantly, with many papers retaining substantial attention through altmetrics and ongoing references in the literature.
Publicly funded research in India plays a vital role in advancing science across disciplines, yet the rising number of retractions has prompted calls for stronger oversight. Institutions such as the Indian Institutes of Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research laboratories, and universities supported by the Department of Science and Technology frequently appear in retraction databases. The new findings highlight both the scale of the challenge and opportunities for reform within the higher education sector.
Key Findings from the 2026 Scientometrics Analysis
The study breaks down reasons for retraction, including data manipulation, plagiarism, and ethical lapses. Of the 368 papers, the majority were research articles, and analysis showed that citations often persist post-retraction, sometimes increasing in certain fields. Altmetric scores revealed continued online engagement, raising questions about how the academic community handles withdrawn work.
Indian funding bodies have responded with policy shifts. The Anusandhan National Research Foundation now requires grant applicants to declare any retractions from the past five years. Similarly, the National Institutional Ranking Framework introduced negative scoring for institutions with high retraction rates in its 2025 edition, marking the first time such penalties appear in a national ranking system.
Photo by Andre William on Unsplash
Implications for Indian Universities and Research Integrity
These developments affect hiring, promotions, and funding decisions at universities across the country. Faculty members at institutions with repeated retractions may face increased scrutiny during performance reviews. The University Grants Commission has also emphasized research ethics in its guidelines for higher education institutions.
Stakeholders including vice-chancellors and research administrators are exploring training programs on publication ethics. Workshops on responsible research practices are becoming common at conferences hosted by bodies such as the Indian Science Congress Association.
Global Context and Comparative Trends
India ranks among the top countries for retractions in life sciences, following China and the United States in some analyses. International comparisons show that publicly funded research in emerging economies faces similar pressures related to publication incentives and evaluation metrics.
Collaboration with global partners on integrity initiatives offers pathways forward. Joint efforts with organizations focused on research ethics can help align Indian practices with international standards.
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
Future Outlook and Actionable Steps
Looking ahead, enhanced monitoring through centralized databases and transparent reporting could reduce problematic publications. Universities are encouraged to integrate ethics modules into doctoral training and to support open-access platforms that prioritize quality over quantity.
Researchers and administrators seeking opportunities in Indian higher education can explore roles focused on research integrity and publication support. Positions in academic administration and research management are increasingly important as institutions adapt to these changes.
