Assistant Professor (Dietetics and Nutrition)

Offer Description

Polytechnic University of Bragança

Notice

1 - It is hereby made public that, by Order No. 5/UPB/2026, of the Rector of the Polytechnic University of Bragança, in the exercise of his own powers, pursuant to the provisions of subparagraph d), of paragraph 1, of Article 92 of Law No. 62/2007, of September 10, and subparagraph d), of paragraph 1, of Article 27 of the Statutes of the UPB, approved by Normative Order No. 62/2008, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd Series, No. 236, of December 5, in its current wording, a documentary competition, of international scope, is open for a period of 35 working days from the day following the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette, for the recruitment of 2 (two) Assistant Professors, for the Higher School of Health of the Polytechnic University of Bragança, under a contract of Public service employment for an indefinite period, with a five-year probationary period, in the Disciplinary Area of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technologies, sub-area of Dietetics and Nutrition, of the staff chart of this University, in accordance with the provisions of articles 5, 10-B, 15, 15-A, 17 and 29-B of the Statute of the Career of Teaching Staff of Higher Polytechnic Education, published by Decree-Law no. 185/81, of July 1, republished by Decree-Law no. 207/2009, of August 31, and amended and supplemented by Law no. 7/2010 of May 13, hereinafter referred to as ECPDESP, in conjunction with Regulation no. 290/2011 on Recruitment, Selection and Hiring of Career Teaching Staff of UPB, published in the Official Gazette. of the Republic, 2nd series, no. 90, of May 10, hereinafter referred to as the Regulation.

2 - Validity period: the competition is valid for filling the indicated job position(s), expiring upon its filling or one year after the date of approval of the final ranking list by the Rector of UPB.

3 - The general admission requirements for this competition are those set out in Article 17 of the General Law on Public Service Employment, approved by Law No. 35/2014 of June 20, in conjunction with Article 12-E of the ECPDESP.

4 - The following are special admission requirements:

4.1 - Holding a PhD in the area or a related area to that for which this competition is open. Applicants holding qualifications obtained abroad must prove the recognition, equivalence or registration of their PhD, in accordance with applicable legislation.

5 - Characterization of the functional content of the category and remuneration position: the generic functions of higher education teachers are foreseen in article 2-A of the ECPDESP, with the functional content of the category being that contained in paragraph 4 of article 3 of the ECPDESP. The remuneration position for the category of Assistant Professor is foreseen in the table annexed to Decree-Law no. 408/89, of November 18, as amended.

6 - Formalization of the application must be carried out, under penalty of exclusion, through a request addressed to the Rector of UPB, within the deadlines set in point 1 of this notice, duly signed and dated, submitted, together with all attachments, through the UPB electronic competition platform (https://concursos.unipb.pt) and must contain the following elements:

a) Full identification (full name and name used in bibliographic references, parentage, place of birth, date of birth, number and date of the citizen card or other legally recognized document, expiry date, marital status, profession, residence, postal code, telephone contact and email address);

b) Academic qualifications and/or professional/academic degrees;

c) Category, group or disciplinary area to which they belong, length of service as a higher education teacher and institution to which they belong, if applicable;

d) Any other elements that candidates consider likely to influence the assessment of their merit or to constitute a reason for legal preference;

(e) Identification of the competition to which you are applying and reference to the Official Gazette in which this notice was published;

f) Date and signature.

7 - Instructions for the admission application:

7.1 - A declaration by the candidate, under oath, in the application itself or in a separate document, of their precise situation regarding the content of each of the following points:

a) Portuguese nationality, unless waived by the Constitution, international convention or special law;

b) Not be barred from exercising public functions or prohibited from exercising the functions for which they are applying;

c) Possess the physical robustness and psychological profile indispensable for the performance of the duties;

d) Compliance with mandatory vaccination laws.

7.2 - According to the ECPDESP, and in accordance with the Regulations for the Recruitment and Hiring of Career Teaching Staff of the Polytechnic University of Bragança, the application for admission to the competition must also include the following elements:

a) Document proving fulfillment of the special requirements set out in point 4 of this notice (certificate of the required degrees and qualifications) and certificate proving length of service;

b) Candidate's Curriculum Vitae, written according to the model in Annex A of this notice;

c) Jobs mentioned by the candidate in their curriculum vitae;

d) If the candidate is not a native speaker of Portuguese, they must possess language skills at level C1 or equivalent of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in Portuguese.

7.3 - When supporting documents are submitted for elements of the Curriculum Vitae that were originally written in a language other than Portuguese, Spanish or English, a translation into Portuguese or English, certified by a recognized entity for this purpose, must be submitted simultaneously.

8 - Failure to submit the supporting documents proving the legally required (general and special) requirements under this notice, or submitting them after the stipulated deadline, will result in exclusion from the procedure.

9 - Without prejudice to the provisions of point e) of paragraph 1 of Article 12 of the Regulations for the Recruitment and Hiring of Career Teaching Staff of the Polytechnic University of Bragança, the failure to submit the documents related to the curriculum submitted by the candidate implies that the elements that should prove it will not be valued, and the same consequence applies when the curriculum vitae or supporting documents are not organized in accordance with the model in Annex A.

10 - Submitting a false document will result in immediate exclusion from the competition and notification to the competent authority for criminal proceedings.

11 - Candidates who are employed at UPB are exempt from submitting documents that already exist in their individual file, and this fact must be expressly mentioned in their application for admission.

12 - Jury Composition: The jury is composed of the following members:

President:

André Filipe Morais Pinto Novo, Deputy Director of the School of Health at the Polytechnic University of Bragança.

Effective vowels:

Maria Palma Mateus, Coordinating Professor at the University of Algarve;

Lino Jorge de Jesus Mendes, Coordinating Professor at the Polytechnic University of Lisbon;

Marisa Paula de Andrade Baeta Guerreiro Cebola, Coordinating Professor at the Polytechnic University of Lisbon;

Ana Lúcia Baltazar dos Santos, Coordinating Professor at the Polytechnic University of Coimbra;

Vera Alexandra Ferro Lebres, Coordinating Professor at the Polytechnic University of Bragança.

13 - Selection and ranking criteria for candidates: in accordance with the provisions of Article 15-A of the ECPDESP and Article 19 of the Regulations for Competitions for the Recruitment of Teaching Staff at UPB, the selection and ranking criteria for candidates, aimed at ascertaining their merit for the functions to be performed, are as follows, to which the following weighting has been assigned:

a) Technical-scientific performance (40%);

b) Pedagogical performance (40%);

c) Other activities relevant to the institution's mission (20%).

13.1 - In the evaluation of technical-scientific performance (DTC), the following criteria, their breakdowns and respective weightings are considered:

I - Academic background (FA)

a) Doctorate in the sub-area of the competition - 20 points;

b) Doctorate in areas related to the competition - 15 points;

c) Specialist Title under Decree-Law No. 206/2009, of August 31, in the sub-area of the competition - 15 points.

The points awarded for the specialist title under Decree-Law No. 206/2009, of August 31, are not cumulative with the points awarded for a doctorate.

d) Bachelor's degree in Nutritional Sciences, Bachelor's degree in Dietetics, or Bachelor's degree in Dietetics and Nutrition - 15 points

e) Other completed training courses considered relevant to the disciplinary sub-area of the competition - maximum 5 points

Training completed within the scope of Higher Education, considered relevant to the sub-area of the competition: Training between 90-120 ECTS - 4 points; 60-89 ECTS - 3 points. Training between 30-59 ECTS - 2 points; 1-29 ECTS - 1 point.

II - Quality and dissemination of research activity results (RAI)

a) Authorship of scientific books in the competition's area with review - 10 points per book in the competition's sub-area. 4 points for other books in the competition's area. Maximum 20 points.

b) Authorship of chapters in scientific books in the area of the competition with review - 5 points per chapter in the sub-area of the competition. 2 points for other chapters. Maximum 2 chapters per book. Maximum of 20 points.

c) Authorship of scientific articles in journals in the disciplinary sub-area of the competition - 5 points per article in indexed journals, using WoS /SCOPUS as a reference; 2.5 points per article in non-indexed journals; For articles indexed in WoS / Scopus , the candidate must present, in the text or as an attachment, proof of indexing, which may be a screenshot obtained from these indexing services. Maximum 20 points.

d) Technical publications in specialized journals within the disciplinary sub-area of the competition - 1.5 points per publication. Maximum 6 points.

e) Participation in scientific events:

i) Articles in proceedings in the sub-area of the competition - 2.5 points per article. Maximum 10 points.

ii ) Oral/poster presentations in the competition's sub-area - 1/0.5 points per oral/poster presentation at scientific events. Maximum of 4 points.

iii ) Participation as a guest speaker at scientific events in the sub-area of the competition - 2.5 points per event participation. Maximum 10 points.

iv ) Participation as a guest moderator in scientific events in the sub-area of the competition - 0.25 points per event participation. Maximum 1 point.

f) Participation in organizing committees or scientific committees of technical-scientific events in the sub-area of the competition - 2 points per participation. Maximum of 8 points.

g) Coordinator or editor of scientific publications in the sub-area of the competition - 5 points per book or journal. Maximum of 20 points.

h) Reviewer of scientific articles submitted to journals in the sub-area of the competition - 2 points per article and/or journal. Maximum of 8 points.

i) Evaluator of scientific research projects in the sub-area of the competition - 5 points per competition for funding programs. Maximum 20 points.

j) Member of societies, associations and other scientific organizations in the sub-area of the competition - 0.5 points per organization. Maximum of 2 points.

k) Other activities in the competition's sub-area - other activities will be valued, namely activities related to the dissemination and promotion of science - 0.5 points per activity. Maximum 2 points.

III - Quality of research projects and contracts (PCI)

The score assigned will take into account the duration, using 12 months as a reference, and clear institutional evidence of the link to the project.

a) International research and development projects with external funding:

i) Project Manager - 10 points per year up to a maximum of 30 points per project; Maximum of 60 points.

ii ) Responsible for the institution's participation in the project - 5 points per year up to a maximum of 15 points per project; Maximum of 30 points.

iii ) Project member - 2 points per year up to a maximum of 6 points per project. Maximum 12 points.

b) National research and development projects with external funding:

i) Project Manager - 5 points per year up to a maximum of 15 points per project; Maximum 30 points.

ii ) Responsible for the institution's participation in the project - 2 points per year up to a maximum of 6 points per project; Maximum 12 points.

iii ) Project member - 1 point per year up to a maximum of 3 points per project. Maximum 6 points.

c) Other funded research and development projects - 1 point per year up to a maximum of 3 points per project. Maximum 6 points.

IV - Supervision of academic work (OTA)

Completed actions, within the sub-area of the competition, as part of studies leading to a doctorate or post-doctorate - 5 points for each doctoral action and 3 points for each post-doctoral action. Maximum 20 points.

V - Knowledge Transfer (CT)

Patents and prototypes in the competition's sub-area - up to 10 points per international patent and 5 points per national patent. Only cases with completed registration and approval processes will be considered. Maximum 40 points.

VI - Awards, grants and distinctions (PBD)

a) Scientific and academic awards, grants and distinctions in the sub-area of the competition awarded by scientific societies or by public and private entities - 5 points per award, grant or distinction. Awards, grants or distinctions of a technical-scientific nature, awarded in national or international competitions by research entities or organizations, scientific societies or by public and private entities of recognized merit, will be considered. Maximum 20 points.

b) Professional license issued by the Order of Nutritionists - 10 points. Professional license as a specialist from the Order of Nutritionists - 20 points. The points are not cumulative.

13.2 - In the assessment of teaching performance (TP), the following criteria, their breakdowns and respective weightings are taken into consideration:

I - Teaching functions (FD)

a) Experience and quality of teaching work:

i) Number of semesters of teaching experience in the sub-area of the competition - 2 points for each semester. The calculation is weighted by the hiring percentage. The candidate will have to provide proof of the hiring percentage. Maximum 12 points.

ii ) Number of different curricular units taught in the sub-area of the competition - 2/3/4 points for each curricular unit, according to the diploma awarded, respectively, technological specialization course/bachelor's degree and bachelor's degree/master's degree and doctorate. Repeating the teaching of the curricular unit will have half the initial score. Maximum 24 points.

iii ) Participation in committees/working groups for the development and creation/adaptation of study plans in the sub-area of the competition - 5 points per course. Maximum 20 points.

b) Educational publications - 3 points per registered publication. Maximum 12 points.

c) Pedagogical innovation in the sub-area of the competition, namely in the use of new methods, in the promotion of study and tutoring modalities, recognized by the competent body of the Higher Education Institution. 1 point for each activity. Maximum of 4 points.

d) Other teaching activities in the sub-area of the competition - 0.5 points for each teaching activity. Maximum of 2 points.

II - Participation in juries (PJ)

a) Participation in juries, in the sub-area of the competition: doctoral as main examiner (10 points per jury member), doctoral as member (7 points per jury member), specialist title under Decree-Law 206/2009 of August 31 as main examiner (5 points per jury member), specialist title under Decree-Law 206/2009 of August 31 as member (3 points per jury member), master's as main examiner (5 points per jury member), master's as member (3 points per jury member), bachelor's as main examiner (2 points per jury member), and bachelor's as member (1 point per jury member). Maximum of 40 points.

b) Participation in research competition juries in the sub-area of the competition - 2 points per jury member. Maximum 8 points.

III - Congresses and Conferences on Teaching (CCD)

a) Organization of educational events - 1 point per event. Maximum 4 points.

b) Participation as a guest speaker at educational events - 1.5 points per event. Maximum 6 points.

IV - Dedication and Quality of Professional Activities Related to Teaching (APD)

a) Organization and teaching of short international courses and teaching in curricular units of foreign institutions in the sub-area of the competition - 5 points per action. Maximum of 20 points.

b) Activities developed within the scope of the ERASMUS program or other similar programs in the sub-area of the competition for teaching: 5 points per activity - maximum 20 points; for technical visits: 3 points per activity - maximum 12 points.

V - Supervision of Dissertations and Theses Leading to Academic Degrees (ODT)

a) Studies leading to a master's degree or equivalent in the sub-area of the competition and completed - 2 points per supervision. Maximum 8 points.

b) Studies leading to a bachelor's degree in the sub-area of the competition and completed - 0.5 points per supervision. Maximum 2 points.

13.3 - In evaluating Other Activities That Have Been Developed and Considered Relevant to the Mission of the Higher Education Institution (HEI), the following criteria, their breakdowns, and respective scores are taken into consideration:

I - Exercise of academic positions and functions (CFA)

a) Performance in single-person management positions: 25 points per term in the case of the institution's top manager; 20 points per term in the case of the Director of an Organizational Unit or equivalent. Positions statutorily provided for in the institutions where the position was held are considered, taking into account their statutory hierarchy. If necessary, points are awarded in proportion to the twelfths fulfilled.

b) Participation in collegiate bodies: 5 points per term for presidencies, 3 for vice-presidencies, 2 points per term for elected members, 1 point per term for ex officio positions, 2 points per term for department coordination or equivalent, 2 points per term for course director or equivalent. Positions statutorily provided for in the institutions where the position was held are considered. Examples include the Board of Directors, General Council, Scientific Council, and Pedagogical Council. Base scores for unspecified positions will be scaled according to the dependence and functional equivalence of the position relative to the reference body.

c) Other appointed positions and functions - 5 points per term in the case of Vice-President/Vice-Rector of the institution or equivalent; 3 points per term in the case of Deputy Director of an organic unit or equivalent and Pro-President/Pro-Rector of the institution or equivalent. For other positions, points will be awarded based on the standard described in a) and b) and the principle of analogy of functions.

II - Extension activities (AE)

0.5 points per activity in the competition's sub-area. Maximum 4 points.

III - Activities Relevant to Teaching and Research, Specifically Community Service within the Scope of the Institution's Mission, Cooperation and Consultancy Service (AEI)

a) 0.5 points per activity in the sub-area of the competition. Maximum 4 points.

b) Professional experience in the sub-area of the competition: 2 points per full year. Maximum 8 points.

c) Supervision of professional internships for access to the Order of Nutritionists - 2 points per completed supervision. Maximum 8 points.

d) Participation as a jury member in professional qualification exams for the Order of Nutritionists - 1 point per participation. Maximum 4 points.

e) Integration of bodies statutorily provided for in the Order of Nutritionists - 3 points. Maximum 12 points. Points to be awarded per full term.

14 - Procedures foreseen for the competition and its calendar: The procedures and rules applicable to the competition are those contained in the UPB's Recruitment, Selection and Hiring of Teaching Staff Regulations, which are available for consultation on the website https://unipb.pt/pt.

14.1 - The evaluation of applications from candidates admitted to the competition will be carried out in accordance with the approved criteria, parameters and weightings.

14.2 - The jury's decisions will be made under the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 21 of the Recruitment Regulations and Article 23 of the ECPDESP.

14.3 - The jury will first deliberate on the ranking process for controlling the admission requirements of candidates for the competition based on the disciplinary area and sub-area in which the competition is open.

14.4 - In the event of a candidate's non-admission, the jury will hold a prior hearing with the excluded candidates who, if they wish, may comment in accordance with point f) of paragraph 1 of article 12 of the Recruitment Regulations.

14.5 - The jury will then proceed to draw up a list of the candidates who have been admitted and those who have been excluded.

14.6 - The ranking of candidates must be based on the evaluation carried out according to the approved criteria and parameters and corresponding weighting factors.

14.7 - The final classification (FC) will result from applying the following formula:

CF = 0.4*DTC + 0.4*DP + 0.2*OA

being:

DTC = 0.1*FA + 0.35*RAI + 0.25*PCI + 0.05*OTA + 0.2*TC + 0.05*PBD

DP = 0.5*FD + 0.1*PJ + 0.1*CCD + 0.2*APD + 0.1*ODT

OA = 0.8*CFA + 0.2*(AE + AEI)

In what way:

FA - Academic Background;

RAI - Quality and Dissemination of Research Activity Results;

PCI - Quality of Research Projects and Contracts;

OTA - Academic Work Guidance;

TC - Knowledge Transfer;

PBD - Awards, Scholarships and Distinctions;

FD - Teaching Functions;

PJ - Participation in Juries;

CCD - Congresses and Conferences on Teaching;

APD - Dedication and Quality of Professional Activities Related to Teaching;

ODT - Guidance for Dissertations and Theses Leading to Academic Degrees;

CFA - Exercise of Academic Positions and Functions;

AE - Extension Activities;

AEI - Activities Relevant to Teaching and Research, Specifically Community Service within the Scope of the Institution's Mission, Cooperation and Consultancy Services;

In each parameter (FA, RAI, PCI, OTA, TC, PBD, FD, PJ, CCD, APD, ODT and CFA) the absolute scores of the candidates will be relativized by the highest value found, which corresponds to 100 points. The same will apply to the sum AE+AEI.

The absolute score for each parameter results from the sum of the scores assigned to each item.

To that end, for each parameter the jury decided to include items that best express the scope of the parameter being evaluated, for which it defined criteria for assigning scores, as indicated below.

The quality of the candidates' curriculum vitae is implicitly evaluated by the differentiation in the scores assigned to different items, and even within the same item when the score is given a maximum value.

In the event of a tie in the ranking between candidates, the following criteria will be applied successively:

a) Having more teaching experience in the sub-area of the competition;

b) To have completed the doctoral degree program a longer period of time ago;

c) Highest final ranking in the bachelor's degree program within the sub-area of the competition.

14.8 - The indicative calendar and deadlines for the procedures described are those indicated in Annex I of Regulation No. 290/2011 on Recruitment, Selection and Hiring of Career Teaching Staff at UPB, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, No. 90, of May 19 - Annex B of this notice.

15 - In accordance with point b) of paragraph 4 of article 23 of the ECPDESP and point g) of paragraph 1 of article 12 of the UPB Regulations for the Recruitment and Hiring of Career Teaching Staff, the jury may hold public hearings, under equal conditions for all admitted candidates.

16 - The objective for the specific evaluation of the activity to be developed by the recruited candidates during the probationary period, when applicable, in compliance with point e) of paragraph 1 of article 11 and with paragraph 1 of article 26 of the Recruitment Regulations, was established by the Scientific Council of the respective Organic Unit in the following terms: "To obtain a minimum rating of Good, during the respective probationary period, in the performance evaluation, as provided for in the Regulations of the Performance Evaluation System for Teaching Staff of the Polytechnic University of Bragança, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, No. 6, of January 10, 2011".

17 - Candidates wishing to apply can consult the application process at the Central Services of the Polytechnic University of Bragança during normal office hours.

18 - Recruitment conditions: candidates who are ranked in an eligible position for hiring in the final approved ranking and who do not have a permanent employment contract with the Public Administration will only be hired by UPB if, on the date of authorization, the requirements set out in Article 26 of Law No. 73-A/2025 of December 30 are met.

19 - In compliance with point h) of article 9 of the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, the Polytechnic University of Bragança, as an employer, actively promotes a policy of equal opportunities between men and women in access to employment and professional advancement, scrupulously ensuring that all forms of discrimination are avoided.

20 - This competition will be registered in the BEP (Public Employment Exchange), included on the website of the Foundation for Science and Technology, in Portuguese and English, as well as on the UPB competition platform.

21 - The processing of personal data within the scope of the competitive procedure complies with the personal data protection policy available at https://unipb.pt/pt/footer/ligacoes-uteis/protecao-de-dados.

Annex A

Template for preparing the curriculum vitae to be submitted by candidates.

I - Technical and scientific performance

a) Academic background:

Academic degrees;

Diplomas and other qualifications.

b) Quality and dissemination of research results:

• Scientific books with peer review;
• Chapters in peer-reviewed scientific books;
• Scientific articles in journals;
• Technical publications;
• Articles in proceedings ;
• Oral or poster presentations;
• Presentations as a guest speaker at scientific events;
• Invited moderator at scientific events;
• Participation in organizing committees or committees for technical-scientific events;
• Coordinator/editor of scientific publications;
• Evaluator of scientific research projects;
• and national scientific societies, associations and other organizations ;
• Other activities.

c) Quality of research projects and contracts:

• Project Coordination / Responsible for internationally funded research and development projects;
• Project Coordinator / Institution Representative responsible for internationally funded research and development projects;
• Participation in internationally funded research and development projects;
• Project Coordination / Responsible for funded national research and development projects;
• Project Coordinator / Institution Representative responsible for nationally funded research and development projects;
• Participation in nationally funded research and development projects;
• Participation in unfunded international or national research and development projects;
• Other projects.

d) Supervision of academic work:

Doctoral and postdoctoral studies.

e) Knowledge transfer:

Patents, prototypes and other intellectual property rights;

f) Awards, grants and distinctions:

Scientific and academic awards, grants and distinctions;

Professional license issued by the Order of Nutritionists

II - Pedagogical performance

a) Teaching duties:

Number of semesters of teaching experience;

Number of different curricular units taught;

Participation in committees/working groups for the development and creation/adaptation of study plans;

Educational publications;

Pedagogical innovation

Other educational activities.

b) Participation in juries:

Participation in juries

Participation in research competition juries;

c) Congresses and conferences on teaching:

Organization of educational events

Participation as a guest speaker at educational events.

d) Organizing and teaching short international courses and teaching curricular units at foreign institutions.

Activities carried out within the framework of the ERASMUS program or similar programs.

e) Supervision of dissertations and theses leading to academic degrees.

Studies leading to a master's degree or equivalent completed;

Studies leading to a bachelor's degree completed;

III - Other activities considered relevant to the mission of UPB

a) Exercise of academic positions and functions:

Performance of single-person management positions;

Participation in collegiate bodies;

Other positions and functions by designation.

b) Extension activities.

c) Activities relevant to teaching and research, namely supporting students in mentoring or tutoring projects, community service within the scope of the institution's mission, cooperation and consultancy services.

Relevant activities

Professional experience in the sub-area of the competition.

Guidance for professional internships to gain access to the Order of Nutritionists.

Participation as a jury member in professional qualification exams for the Order of Nutritionists.

Integration of bodies statutorily provided for in the Order of Nutritionists

Annex B

Recruitment Process Calendar

Start of the Process

Resolution of the Management Board regarding the proposed contract or corresponding procedure.

a) Appointment of the Jury

Indicative timeframe: Maximum of 15 days after the start of the process.

b) Submission for publication of the announcement of the opening of the competition.

Suggested timeframe: Maximum of 20 days after the jury's appointment.

c) Application submission period

Indicative timeframe: Between 35 and 60 working days after the publication of the job opening.

d) Request for additional documentation

Suggested deadline: Maximum of 10 days after the end of the application period.

e) Pre-selection of candidates

Suggested deadline: Maximum of 15 days after the deadline for receiving applications.

f) Publication of the list of admitted candidates

Suggested deadline: Maximum of 15 days after the deadline for receiving applications.

g) Public hearings

Suggested timeframe: Maximum of 15 consecutive days after the publication of the list of admitted candidates.

h) Candidate selection process, final decision, and publication of minutes and ranked list of candidates.

Suggested deadline: Maximum of 15 days after the end of the public hearing period (maximum legal limit of 90 days after the deadline for submitting applications).

i) Sending the documentation related to the competition to the Rector of UPB

Indicative timeframe: Maximum of 10 days after the final decision is issued.

j) Approval of the competition results and the respective minutes by the Rector of UPB and communication of results.

Indicative timeframe: Maximum of 10 days after the final decision is issued.

Bragança, October 20, 2026 - The Rector of UPB, Professor Dr. Orlando Isidoro Afonso Rodrigues

Where to apply

Website: https://concursos.unipb.pt

Requirements

• Research Field: Other
• Education Level: PhD or equivalent

Work Location(s)

• Number of offers available: 1
• Company/Institute: Universidade Politécnica de Bragança
• Country: Portugal
• State/Province: Bragança
• City: Bragança
• Postal Code: 5300-253
• Street: Campus Santa Apolónia

Contact

• City: Bragança
• Website: http://www.unipb.pt
• Street: Campus S. Apolónia
• Postal Code: 5300-253
• E-Mail: concursos-pessoal@unipb.pt